Small overlap front: driver-side
Rating applies to 2017-23 models
Tested vehicle: 2017 Subaru Impreza 2.0i 4-door 4wd
The Subaru Impreza was redesigned for the 2017 model year and the Subaru Crosstrek was redesigned for the 2018 model year. Two driver-side small overlap frontal tests of the Impreza were conducted, one by the Institute and the other by Subaru as part of frontal crash test verification. Ratings are based on both tests and apply to both the 4-door sedan and wagon versions of the Impreza as well as 2018 and later models of the Crosstrek wagon.
The Subaru Crosstrek Hybrid, a plug-in hybrid electric variant of the Crosstrek wagon, was introduced in the 2019 model year. Ratings also apply to the Crosstrek Hybrid.
Overall evaluation | |
---|---|
Structure and safety cage | |
Driver injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Chest | |
Hip/thigh | |
Lower leg/foot | |
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics |
Action shot taken during the Institute's driver-side small overlap frontal crash test.
The dummy's position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained very well (Institute test car shown).
The frontal and side curtain airbags worked well together to keep the head from coming close to any stiff structure or outside objects that could cause injury (Institute test shown).
The driver's space was maintained well in both tests, and risk of injuries to the dummy's legs and feet was low.
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
Test ID | CEN1704 | VTN1701 |
---|---|---|
Lower occupant compartment | ||
Lower hinge pillar max (cm) | 2 | 4 |
Footrest (cm) | 4 | 7 |
Left toepan (cm) | 3 | 4 |
Brake pedal (cm) | 3 | 4 |
Parking brake (cm) | ||
Rocker panel lateral average (cm) | 0 | 2 |
Upper occupant compartment | ||
Steering column | 0 | 0 |
Upper hinge pillar max (cm) | 2 | 2 |
Upper dash (cm) | 2 | 3 |
Lower instrument panel (cm) | 3 | 4 |
Driver injury measures
Test ID | CEN1704 | VTN1701 |
---|---|---|
Head | ||
HIC-15 | 78 | 261 |
Peak gs at hard contact | no contact | no contact |
Neck | ||
Tension (kN) | 0.7 | 1.3 |
Extension bending moment (Nm) | 10 | 7 |
Maximum Nij | 0.21 | 0.22 |
Chest maximum compression (mm) | 21 | 27 |
Femur (kN) | ||
Left | 0.9 | 1.1 |
Right | 1.7 | 1.1 |
Knee displacement (mm) | ||
Left | 1 | 1 |
Right | 1 | 1 |
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%) | ||
Left | 0 | 0 |
Right | 0 | 0 |
Maximum tibia index | ||
Left | 0.62 | 0.64 |
Right | 0.68 | 0.34 |
Tibia axial force (kN) | ||
Left | 2.8 | 2.9 |
Right | 4.0 | 2.0 |
Foot acceleration (g) | ||
Left | 60 | 66 |
Right | 67 | 79 |
Small overlap front: passenger-side
Rating applies to 2017-23 models
Tested vehicle: 2017 Subaru Impreza 2.0i Premium wagon 4wd
The Subaru Impreza was redesigned for the 2017 model year and the Subaru Crosstrek was redesigned for the 2018 model year. Passenger-side small overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Subaru as part of frontal crash test verification. Ratings apply to both the 4-door sedan and wagon versions of the Impreza as well as 2018 and later models of the Crosstrek wagon.
The Subaru Crosstrek Hybrid, a plug-in hybrid electric variant of the Crosstrek wagon, was introduced in the 2019 model year. Ratings also apply to the Crosstrek Hybrid.
Overall evaluation | |
---|---|
Structure and safety cage | |
Passenger injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Chest | |
Hip/thigh | |
Lower leg/foot | |
Passenger restraints and dummy kinematics | |
Driver injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Chest | |
Hip/thigh | |
Lower leg/foot | |
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics |
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on passenger side
Test ID | VTP1707 |
---|---|
Lower occupant compartment | |
Lower hinge pillar max (cm) | 5 |
Footrest (cm) | 11 |
Right toepan (cm) | 6 |
Center toepan (cm) | 1 |
Rocker panel lateral average (cm) | 1 |
Upper occupant compartment | |
Center dash (cm) | 2 |
Upper hinge pillar max (cm) | 4 |
Upper dash (cm) | 4 |
Right lower dash (cm) | 4 |
Passenger injury measures
Test ID | VTP1707 |
---|---|
Head | |
HIC-15 | 85 |
Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
Neck | |
Tension (kN) | 1.1 |
Extension bending moment (Nm) | 8 |
Maximum Nij | 0.23 |
Chest maximum compression (mm) | 22 |
Femur (kN) | |
Left | 0.2 |
Right | 0.1 |
Knee displacement (mm) | |
Left | 0 |
Right | 0 |
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%) | |
Left | 0 |
Right | 0 |
Maximum tibia index | |
Left | 0.42 |
Right | 0.59 |
Tibia axial force (kN) | |
Left | 2.3 |
Right | 2.1 |
Foot acceleration (g) | |
Left | 38 |
Right | 31 |
Driver injury measures
Test ID | VTP1707 |
---|---|
Head | |
HIC-15 | 70 |
Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
Neck | |
Tension (kN) | 0.8 |
Extension bending moment (Nm) | 9 |
Maximum Nij | 0.16 |
Chest maximum compression (mm) | 31 |
Femur (kN) | |
Left | 0.4 |
Right | 0.7 |
Knee displacement (mm) | |
Left | 1 |
Right | 1 |
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%) | |
Left | 0 |
Right | 0 |
Maximum tibia index | |
Left | 0.36 |
Right | 0.43 |
Tibia axial force (kN) | |
Left | 1.1 |
Right | 1.9 |
Foot acceleration (g) | |
Left | 39 |
Right | 51 |
How the passenger-side small overlap front test is conducted
Moderate overlap front: original test
Rating applies to 2017-23 models
Tested vehicle: 2017 Subaru Impreza 2.0i Premium wagon 4wd
The Subaru Impreza was redesigned for the 2017 model year and the Subaru Crosstrek was redesigned for the 2018 model year. Moderate overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Subaru as part of frontal crash test verification. Ratings apply to both the 4-door sedan and wagon versions of the Impreza as well as 2018 and later models of the Crosstrek wagon.
The Subaru Crosstrek Hybrid, a plug-in hybrid electric variant of the Crosstrek wagon, was introduced in the 2019 model year. Ratings also apply to the Crosstrek Hybrid.
Overall evaluation | |
---|---|
Structure and safety cage | |
Driver injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Chest | |
Leg/foot, left | |
Leg/foot, right | |
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics |
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
Test ID | VTF1627 |
---|---|
Footwell intrusion | |
Footrest (cm) | 4 |
Left (cm) | 7 |
Center (cm) | 8 |
Right (cm) | 4 |
Brake pedal (cm) | 3 |
Instrument panel rearward movement | |
Left (cm) | -1 |
Right (cm) | 0 |
Steering column movement | |
Upward (cm) | -3 |
Rearward (cm) | -6 |
A-pillar rearward movement (cm) | 0 |
Driver injury measures
Test ID | VTF1627 |
---|---|
Head | |
HIC-15 | 143 |
Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
Neck | |
Tension (kN) | 1.2 |
Extension bending moment (Nm) | 22 |
Maximum Nij | 0.28 |
Chest maximum compression (mm) | 31 |
Legs | |
Femur force - left (kN) | 1.4 |
Femur force - right (kN) | 1.0 |
Knee displacement - left (mm) | 1 |
Knee displacement - right (mm) | 1 |
Maximum tibia index - left | 0.43 |
Maximum tibia index - right | 0.52 |
Tibia axial force - left (kN) | 2.6 |
Tibia axial force - right (kN) | 2.2 |
Foot acceleration (g) | |
Left | 84 |
Right | 50 |
Side: original test
Rating applies to 2017-23 models
Tested vehicle: 2017 Subaru Impreza 2.0i Premium wagon 4wd
The Subaru Impreza was redesigned for the 2017 model year and the Subaru Crosstrek was redesigned for the 2018 model year. Side ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Subaru as part of side crash test verification. Ratings apply to both the 4-door sedan and wagon versions of the Impreza as well as 2018 and later models of the Crosstrek wagon.
Overall evaluation | |
---|---|
Structure and safety cage | |
Driver injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Torso | |
Pelvis/leg | |
Driver head protection | |
Rear passenger injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Torso | |
Pelvis/leg | |
Rear passenger head protection |
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
Test ID | VTS1626 |
---|---|
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm) | -16.5 |
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline. |
Driver injury measures
Test ID | VTS1626 |
---|---|
Head HIC-15 | 273 |
Neck | |
Tension (kN) | 0.6 |
Compression (kN) | 0.1 |
Shoulder | |
Lateral deflection (mm) | 41 |
Lateral force (kN) | 1.9 |
Torso | |
Maximum deflection (mm) | 43 |
Average deflection (mm) | 32 |
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) | 2.88 |
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) | 0.54 |
Pelvis | |
Iliac force (kN) | 0.8 |
Acetabulum force (kN) | 2.5 |
Combined force (kN) | 3.1 |
Left femur | |
L-M force (kN) | 1.2 |
L-M moment (Nm) | 191 |
A-P moment (Nm) | 47 |
Passenger injury measures
Test ID | VTS1626 |
---|---|
Head HIC-15 | 189 |
Neck | |
Tension (kN) | 1.0 |
Compression (kN) | 0.5 |
Shoulder | |
Lateral deflection (mm) | 33 |
Lateral force (kN) | 1.5 |
Torso | |
Maximum deflection (mm) | 25 |
Average deflection (mm) | 21 |
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) | 3.15 |
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) | 0.24 |
Pelvis | |
Iliac force (kN) | 0.4 |
Acetabulum force (kN) | 1.2 |
Combined force (kN) | 1.2 |
Left femur | |
L-M force (kN) | 1.7 |
L-M moment (Nm) | 168 |
A-P moment (Nm) | -41 |
Side: updated test
Rating applies to 2017-23 models
Tested vehicle: 2022 Subaru Crosstrek Premium 4-door 4wd
The Subaru Impreza was redesigned for the 2017 model year and the Subaru Crosstrek was redesigned for the 2018 model year. Ratings apply to both the 4-door sedan and wagon versions of the Impreza as well as 2018 and later models of the Crosstrek wagon.
Overall evaluation | |
---|---|
Structure and safety cage | |
Driver injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Torso | |
Pelvis | |
Driver head protection
The dummy's head moved downward past the side curtain airbag and contacted the window sill. The head protection is inadequate. | |
Rear passenger injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Torso | |
Pelvis | |
Rear passenger head protection |
View of the vehicle just after the crash test.
View of the vehicle after the crash with doors removed, showing the side airbags and damage to the occupant compartment.
Smeared greasepaint shows that the driver dummy's head moved downward, past the side curtain airbag, and contacted the window sill.
Smeared greasepaint shows where the rear passenger dummy’s head was protected by the side airbag.
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
Test ID | CES2232 |
---|---|
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm) | -7.0 |
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline. |
Driver injury measures
Test ID | CES2232 |
---|---|
Head | |
HIC-15 | 245 |
Peak gs at hard contact | 55 |
Neck | |
Tension (kN) | 1.3 |
Compression (kN) | 0.0 |
Shoulder | |
Lateral deflection (mm) | 48 |
Lateral force (kN) | 1.6 |
Torso | |
Maximum deflection (mm) | 51 |
Average deflection (mm) | 47 |
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) | 4.45 |
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) | 1.15 |
Pelvis | |
Combined force (kN) | 5.0 |
Passenger injury measures
Test ID | CES2232 |
---|---|
Head | |
HIC-15 | 231 |
Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
Neck | |
Tension (kN) | 0.4 |
Compression (kN) | 0.8 |
Shoulder | |
Lateral deflection (mm) | 53 |
Lateral force (kN) | 1.9 |
Torso | |
Maximum deflection (mm) | 43 |
Average deflection (mm) | 40 |
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) | 5.81 |
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) | 1.20 |
Pelvis | |
Combined force (kN) | 3.7 |
Roof strength
Rating applies to 2017-23 models
Tested vehicle: 2017 Subaru Impreza 2.0i Premium 4-door 4wd
Rating applies to both the Impreza 4-door sedan (tested) and wagon versions and to the structurally similar 2018 and later Crosstrek wagon.
Overall evaluation | |
---|---|
Curb weight | 3,058 lbs |
Peak force | 15,167 lbs |
Strength-to-weight ratio | 4.96 |
Head restraints & seats
Seat type: Manual cloth seat
Overall evaluation | |
---|---|
Dynamic rating | |
Seat/head restraint geometry |
Seat type | Manual cloth seat |
---|---|
Geometry | |
Backset (mm) | 26 |
Distance below top of head (mm) | -4 |
Seat design parameters | |
Pass/fail | Pass |
Max T1 acceleration (g) | 10.2 |
Head contact time (ms) | 56 |
Force rating | 1 |
Neck forces | |
Max neck shear force (N) | 0 |
Max neck tension (N) | 329 |
How the head restraint & seat test is conducted
Currently, IIHS tests apply only to front seats.
Headlights
Ratings are given for 4 different headlight variations available on this vehicle.
Trim level(s)
- 2.0i Limited trim equipped with EyeSight Driver Assist package
Low-beam headlight type | LED projector |
---|---|
High-beam headlight type | LED projector |
Curve-adaptive? | Yes |
High-beam assist? | Yes |
Overall rating | |
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination: |
Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good on the sharp left and both right curves and fair on the gradual left curve.
The low beams created some glare.
High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and fair on the left side. On curves, visibility was fair in all 4 tests.
High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway and on the gradual left curve.
Trim level(s) |
|
---|---|
Low-beam headlight type | LED projector |
High-beam headlight type | LED projector |
Curve-adaptive? | Yes |
High-beam assist? | Yes |
Overall rating Applies to 2017-19 models |
LOW BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
Amount glare exceeded threshold |
---|---|---|
Straightaway right edge | 111.3 m | 13.5% |
Straightaway left edge | 56.3 m | 13.5% |
250m radius right curve, right edge | 72.9 m | None |
250m radius left curve, right edge | 62.6 m | None |
150m radius right curve, right edge | 62.9 m | None |
150m radius left curve, left edge | 61.3 m | None |
HIGH BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
---|---|
Straightaway right edge | 143.0 m |
Straightaway left edge | 140.4 m |
250m radius right curve, right edge | 73.5 m |
250m radius left curve, left edge | 70.3 m |
150m radius right curve, right edge | 61.9 m |
150m radius left curve, left edge | 61.7 m |
Trim level(s)
- 2.0i Limited trim
Low-beam headlight type | LED projector |
---|---|
High-beam headlight type | LED projector |
Curve-adaptive? | Yes |
High-beam assist? | No |
Overall rating | |
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination: |
Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good on the sharp left and both right curves and fair on the gradual left curve.
The low beams created some glare.
High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and fair on the left side. On curves, visibility was fair in all 4 tests.
Trim level(s) |
|
---|---|
Low-beam headlight type | LED projector |
High-beam headlight type | LED projector |
Curve-adaptive? | Yes |
High-beam assist? | No |
Overall rating Applies to 2017-18 models |
LOW BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
Amount glare exceeded threshold |
---|---|---|
Straightaway right edge | 111.3 m | 13.5% |
Straightaway left edge | 56.3 m | 13.5% |
250m radius right curve, right edge | 72.9 m | None |
250m radius left curve, right edge | 62.6 m | None |
150m radius right curve, right edge | 62.9 m | None |
150m radius left curve, left edge | 61.3 m | None |
HIGH BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
---|---|
Straightaway right edge | 143.0 m |
Straightaway left edge | 140.4 m |
250m radius right curve, right edge | 73.5 m |
250m radius left curve, left edge | 70.3 m |
150m radius right curve, right edge | 61.9 m |
150m radius left curve, left edge | 61.7 m |
Trim level(s)
- 2.0i Premium trim equipped with EyeSight Driver Assist Technology package
Low-beam headlight type | Halogen reflector |
---|---|
High-beam headlight type | Halogen reflector |
Curve-adaptive? | Yes |
High-beam assist? | No |
Overall rating | |
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination: |
Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was fair on the left side of the road and inadequate on the right side. On curves, visibility was fair on both right curves and inadequate on both left curves.
The low beams never exceeded glare limits.
High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and fair on the left side. On curves, visibility was fair on the gradual right curve and inadequate on the sharp right and both left curves.
Trim level(s) |
|
---|---|
Low-beam headlight type | Halogen reflector |
High-beam headlight type | Halogen reflector |
Curve-adaptive? | Yes |
High-beam assist? | No |
Overall rating Applies to 2017-19 models |
LOW BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
Amount glare exceeded threshold |
---|---|---|
Straightaway right edge | 76.9 m | None |
Straightaway left edge | 50.1 m | None |
250m radius right curve, right edge | 55.3 m | None |
250m radius left curve, left edge | 45.2 m | None |
150m radius right curve, right edge | 52.6 m | None |
150m radius left curve, left edge | 42.2 m | None |
HIGH BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
---|---|
Straightaway right edge | 154.9 m |
Straightaway left edge | 138.2 m |
250m radius right curve, right edge | 65.5 m |
250m radius left curve, left edge | 60.8 m |
150m radius right curve, right edge | 51.8 m |
150m radius left curve, left edge | 49.2 m |
Trim level(s)
- 2.0i Premium trim
- 2.0i Sport trim
- 2.0i trim
Low-beam headlight type | Halogen reflector |
---|---|
High-beam headlight type | Halogen reflector |
Curve-adaptive? | No |
High-beam assist? | No |
Overall rating | |
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination: |
Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was fair on the left side of the road and inadequate on the right side. On curves, visibility was inadequate in all 4 tests.
The low beams never exceeded glare limits.
High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and fair on the left side. On curves, visibility was fair on the gradual right curve and inadequate on the sharp right and both left curves.
Trim level(s) |
|
---|---|
Low-beam headlight type | Halogen reflector |
High-beam headlight type | Halogen reflector |
Curve-adaptive? | No |
High-beam assist? | No |
Overall rating Applies to 2017-23 models |
LOW BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
Amount glare exceeded threshold |
---|---|---|
Straightaway right edge | 76.9 m | None |
Straightaway left edge | 50.1 m | None |
250m radius right curve, right edge | 54.7 m | None |
250m radius left curve, left edge | 44.4 m | None |
150m radius right curve, right edge | 44.3 m | None |
150m radius left curve, left edge | 39.4 m | None |
HIGH BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
---|---|
Straightaway right edge | 154.9 m |
Straightaway left edge | 138.2 m |
250m radius right curve, right edge | 65.5 m |
250m radius left curve, left edge | 60.8 m |
150m radius right curve, right edge | 51.8 m |
150m radius left curve, left edge | 49.2 m |
Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle
Child seat anchors
Rating applies to 2017-23 models
Overall evaluation | + extra LATCH positions |
Vehicle trim | 2.0i Premium |
Seat type | cloth |
This vehicle has 2 rear seating positions with complete child seat attachment (LATCH) hardware.
It has 1 additional seating position with a tether anchor and the ability to borrow lower anchors from the other seating positions.
Note: When anchors are borrowed, they aren't available to use in their designated positions.
Overall evaluation | + extra LATCH positions |
Vehicle trim | 2.0i Premium |
Seat type | cloth |
G | Good |
A | Acceptable |
M | Marginal |
P | Poor |
Seating positions that rely on borrowed lower anchors or have only a tether anchor available are not rated. | |
thether anchor symbol | Tether anchor |
lower anchor symbol | Lower anchors |
Lower anchor(s) can be borrowed from adjacent positions(s) | |
No hardware available |
Details by seating position
1 | |
---|---|
Tether anchor | |
easy-to-find location | |
no other hardware could be confused for anchor | |
Lower anchors | |
not too deep in seat | |
not too much force needed to attach | |
easy to maneuver around anchors | |
2 | |
Tether anchor | |
easy-to-find location | |
no other hardware could be confused for anchor | |
Lower anchors | |
Can be borrowed from 1 and 3 | |
3 | |
Tether anchor | |
easy-to-find location | |
no other hardware could be confused for anchor | |
Lower anchors | |
not too deep in seat | |
not too much force needed to attach | |
easy to maneuver around anchors |
Seat position 21
Lower anchor A | |
---|---|
Open access rated | Yes |
Depth | Visible |
Force (lbs) | 0 |
Clearance angle (degrees) | 90 |
Lower anchor B | |
Open access rated | Yes |
Depth | Visible |
Force (lbs) | 1 |
Clearance angle (degrees) | 83 |
Tether anchor | |
Location | Middle seatback |
Confusing hardware present | Yes |
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor |
Yes |
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH |
Not measured |
Seat position 22
Lower anchor A | |
---|---|
Lower latch is shared for this seat position | |
Lower anchor B | |
Lower latch is shared for this seat position | |
Tether anchor | |
Location | Middle seatback |
Confusing hardware present | Yes |
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor |
Yes |
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH |
Not measured |
Seat position 23
Lower anchor A | |
---|---|
Open access rated | Yes |
Depth | Visible |
Force (lbs) | 1 |
Clearance angle (degrees) | 83 |
Lower anchor B | |
Open access rated | Yes |
Depth | Visible |
Force (lbs) | 0 |
Clearance angle (degrees) | 87 |
Tether anchor | |
Location | Middle seatback |
Confusing hardware present | Yes |
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor |
Yes |
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH |
Not measured |