2026 Ram 1500

large pickup / Crew cab pickup

2026 Ram 1500 Crew cab pickup
2025 Ram 1500 shown

Crashworthiness

Rating overview
Evaluation criteriaRating
Small overlap front
G
Moderate overlap front: updated test
P
Side: updated test
G

Crash avoidance & mitigation

Evaluation criteriaRating
Headlights (varies by trim/option)
GA
Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle 2.0
Standard system
M
Front crash prevention: pedestrian
Standard system
G

Seat belts & child restraints

Evaluation criteriaRating
Seat belt reminders
M
LATCH ease of use
M

Key

GGood
AAcceptable
MMarginal
PPoor

Small overlap front

The small overlap front evaluation consists of a driver-side and a passenger-side component. If the results of the two evaluations differ, then the combined small overlap rating is equal to the lower rating.

Driver-side

Tested vehicle: 2025 Ram 1500 Big Horn Crew cab 4wd
Rating applies to 2025-26 models

The Ram 1500 Crew Cab was redesigned for the 2019 model year. Beginning with 2025 models, changes were made to the steering column and driver-side airbag to improve occupant safety in driver-side small overlap crashes. Ratings are based on a test of a 2025 Ram 1500 conducted by Stellantis.

Evaluation criteriaRating
Overall driver-side evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
A
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Hip/thigh
G
Lower leg/foot
G
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics
G
Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Evaluation criteriaMeasurement
Test ID VTN2515
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm) 10
Footrest (cm) 11
Left toepan (cm) 11
Brake pedal (cm) 13
Parking brake (cm)
Rocker panel lateral average (cm) 0
Upper occupant compartment
Steering column 0
Upper hinge pillar max (cm) 10
Upper dash (cm) 10
Lower instrument panel (cm) 9

Driver injury measures

Evaluation criteriaMeasurement
Test ID VTN2515
Head
HIC-15 123
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.7
Extension bending moment (Nm) 8
Maximum Nij 0.22
Chest maximum compression (mm) 22
Femur (kN)
Left 1.0
Right 0.2
Knee displacement (mm)
Left 5
Right 1
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left 0
Right 0
Maximum tibia index
Left 0.54
Right 0.35
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left 3.4
Right 1.1
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 93
Right 49

Passenger-side

Tested vehicle: 2025 RAM 1500 Big Horn Crew cab 4wd
Rating applies to 2025-26 models

The Ram 1500 Crew Cab was redesigned for the 2019 model year. Beginning with 2025 models, changes were made to the passenger-side airbag to improve occupant safety in passenger-side small overlap crashes. Ratings are based on a test of a 2025 Ram 1500 conducted by Stellantis.

Evaluation criteriaRating
Overall passenger-side evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
A
Passenger injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Hip/thigh
G
Lower leg/foot
A
Passenger restraints and dummy kinematics
G
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Hip/thigh
G
Lower leg/foot
G
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics
G
Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on passenger side

Evaluation criteriaMeasurement
Test ID VTP2517
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm) 10
Footrest (cm) 19
Right toepan (cm) 14
Center toepan (cm) 6
Rocker panel lateral average (cm) 5
Upper occupant compartment
Center dash (cm) 7
Upper hinge pillar max (cm) 10
Upper dash (cm) 10
Right lower dash (cm) 10

Passenger injury measures

Evaluation criteriaMeasurement
Test ID VTP2517
Head
HIC-15 284
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.0
Extension bending moment (Nm) 23
Maximum Nij 0.20
Chest maximum compression (mm) 15
Femur (kN)
Left 1.6
Right 1.4
Knee displacement (mm)
Left 8
Right 5
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left 0
Right 0
Maximum tibia index
Left 0.59
Right 0.91
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left 2.8
Right 2.6
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 106
Right 79

Driver injury measures

Evaluation criteriaMeasurement
Test ID VTP2517
Head
HIC-15 87
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.1
Extension bending moment (Nm) 11
Maximum Nij 0.20
Chest maximum compression (mm) 15
Femur (kN)
Left 0.0
Right 0.0
Knee displacement (mm)
Left 1
Right 0
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left 0
Right 0
Maximum tibia index
Left 0.48
Right 0.23
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left 0.1
Right 0.9
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 80
Right 52

About the small overlap front test

Moderate overlap front: updated test

Tested vehicle: 2025 Ram 1500 Tradesman Crew Cab 4-door 4wd
Rating applies to 2025-26 models

The Ram 1500 Crew Cab was redesigned for the 2019 model year. Beginning with 2025 models, pretensioners and load limiters were added to the rear passenger outboard seats.

Evaluation criteriaRating
Overall evaluation
P
Structure and safety cage
G
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Thigh/hip
G
Leg/foot
G
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics
G
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
M
Thigh
G
Rear passenger restraints and dummy kinematics
P
Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Evaluation criteriaMeasurement
Test IDCEF2559
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm)4
Left (cm)7
Center (cm)11
Right (cm)6
Brake pedal (cm)6
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm)0
Right (cm)1
Steering column movement
Upward (cm)-2
Rearward (cm)-9
A-pillar rearward movement (cm)0

Driver injury measures

Evaluation criteriaMeasurement
Test IDCEF2559
Head
HIC-15135
Peak gs at hard contactno contact
Neck
Tension (kN)0.7
Extension bending moment (Nm)10
Maximum Nij0.20
Chest maximum compression (mm)20
Femur (kN)
Left1.0
Right0.2
Knee displacement (mm)
Left8
Right1
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left0
Right0
Maximum tibia index
Left0.74
Right0.36
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left2.3
Right1.7
Foot acceleration (g)
Left46
Right83

Rear passenger injury measures

Test IDCEF2559
Head
HIC-15 for head contact during forward excursion
no contact
Peak gs at hard contactno contact
Neck
Tension (kN)1.7
Compression (kN)0.7
Maximum Nij for head contact during forward excursion
no contact
Chest
Chest index44
Shoulder belt tension (kN)3.9
Thigh (kN)
Left femur compression0.3
Right femur compression0.3

About the moderate overlap front test

February 2024 adjustment to rating criteria

Side: updated test

Tested vehicle: 2023 Ram 1500 Big Horn Crew Cab 4wd
Rating applies to 2019-26 models

The Ram 1500 Crew Cab was redesigned for the 2019 model year. The earlier design remained in production for the 2019-20 model years and was called the Ram 1500 Classic Crew Cab. The ratings on this page do not apply to the Classic.

Evaluation criteriaRating
Overall evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
G
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
G
Torso
G
Pelvis
G
Driver head protection
G
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
G
Torso
G
Pelvis
G
Rear passenger head protection
G
Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Evaluation criteria Measurement
Test ID CES2310
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm) -18.5
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.

Driver injury measures

Evaluation criteria Measurement
Test ID CES2310
Head
HIC-15 27
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.4
Compression (kN) 0.5
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm) 12
Lateral force (kN) 0.6
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm) 15
Average deflection (mm) 12
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) 2.57
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) 0.10
Pelvis
Combined force (kN) 2.7

Passenger injury measures

Evaluation criteria Measurement
Test ID CES2310
Head
HIC-15 58
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.2
Compression (kN) 0.9
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm) 40
Lateral force (kN) 1.8
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm) 21
Average deflection (mm) 14
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) 2.57
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) 0.28
Pelvis
Combined force (kN) 2.6

About the side crash test

Headlights

Ratings are given for 2 different headlight variations available on this vehicle.

(1) Trim level(s): Tungstun trim, RHO trim, Limited trim, Limited Longhorn trim

Evaluation criteriaRating
Low-beam headlight typeLED projector
High-beam headlight typeLED projector
Curve-adaptive?No
High-beam assist?Yes
Overall rating
G
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:
car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler 0 ft 100 ft 200 ft 300 ft 400 ft 500 ft 600 ft Low beams Optimal low-beam illumination High beams Optimal high-beam illumination High-beam assist credit

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the left side of the road and fair on the right side. On curves, visibility was good on both right curves, fair on the sharp left curve and inadequate on the gradual left curve.

The low beams never exceeded glare limits.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good on both right curves and fair on both left curves.

High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway and on both left curves.

Technical measurements for this test
Evaluation criteria Measurement
Trim level(s)
  • Tungstun trim
  • RHO trim
  • Limited trim
  • Limited Longhorn trim
Low-beam headlight type LED projector
High-beam headlight type LED projector
Curve-adaptive? No
High-beam assist? Yes
Overall rating
Applies to 2025-26 models
G
LOW BEAMS Average minimum useful
illumination distance (5 lux)
Amount glare
exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge 84.8 m None
Straightaway left edge 61.7 m None
250m radius right curve, right edge 89.2 m None
250m radius left curve, left edge 50.6 m None
150m radius right curve, right edge 73.9 m None
150m radius left curve, left edge 46.1 m None
HIGH BEAMS Average minimum useful
illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge 152.2 m
Straightaway left edge 149.1 m
250m radius right curve, right edge 100.7 m
250m radius left curve, left edge 74.6 m
150m radius right curve, right edge 74.6 m
150m radius left curve, left edge 61.0 m

About the headlight evaluation

(2) Trim level(s): Tradesman trim, Big Horn trim, Warlock trim, Laramie trim, Rebel trim, Express trim

Evaluation criteriaRating
Low-beam headlight typeLED reflector
High-beam headlight typeLED reflector
Curve-adaptive?No
High-beam assist?Yes
Overall rating
A
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:
car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler 0 ft 100 ft 200 ft 300 ft 400 ft 500 ft 600 ft Low beams Optimal low-beam illumination High beams Optimal high-beam illumination High-beam assist credit

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was fair on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good on the gradual right curve, fair on the sharp left and sharp right curves, and inadequate on the gradual left curve.

The low beams never exceeded glare limits.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was fair on the gradual left and gradual right curves and inadequate on the sharp left and sharp right curves.

High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway and all 4 curves.

Technical measurements for this test
Evaluation criteria Measurement
Trim level(s)
  • Tradesman trim
  • Big Horn trim
  • Warlock trim
  • Laramie trim
  • Rebel trim
  • Express trim
Low-beam headlight type LED reflector
High-beam headlight type LED reflector
Curve-adaptive? No
High-beam assist? Yes
Overall rating
Applies to 2025-26 models
A
LOW BEAMS Average minimum useful
illumination distance (5 lux)
Amount glare
exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge 92.2 m None
Straightaway left edge 54.2 m None
250m radius right curve, right edge 67.6 m None
250m radius left curve, right edge 52.9 m None
150m radius right curve, right edge 47.8 m None
150m radius left curve, left edge 53.7 m None
HIGH BEAMS Average minimum useful
illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge 156.8 m
Straightaway left edge 148.2 m
250m radius right curve, right edge 70.8 m
250m radius left curve, left edge 72.7 m
150m radius right curve, right edge 49.2 m
150m radius left curve, left edge 54.9 m

About the headlight evaluation

Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle 2.0

System details

  • standard Full Speed Foward Collision Warning Plus
Evaluation criteriaRating
Overall evaluation
M
Rating applies to all 2025-26 models

Passenger car target

Test runSpeed reductionTimely warning?
31 mph/target centeredCollision avoided
31 mph/target off-centerCollision avoided
37 mph/target centeredCollision avoided
37 mph/target off-centerCollision avoided
43 mph/target centeredCollision avoided
43 mph/target off-centerCollision avoided

Motorcycle target

Test runSpeed reductionTimely warning?
31 mph/target centeredCollision avoided
31 mph/target off-center15 mph
37 mph/target centeredCollision avoided
37 mph/target off-centerAutobrake not tested
43 mph/target centered2 mph
43 mph/target off-centerAutobrake not tested

Semitrailer

Only warning is tested with the semitrailer.

Test runTimely warning?
31 mph/target centered
37 mph/target centered
43 mph/target centered

About the front crash prevention test

Front crash prevention: pedestrian

System details

  • standard Full-Speed Forward Collision Plus
Evaluation criteriaRating
Overall evaluation
G
Includes high-beam assist credit
Rating applies to all 2025-26 models

Crossing child — day

  • In the 12 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
  • In the 25 mph test, impact speed was reduced by 8 mph.

Crossing adult — night

  • In the 12 mph test, this vehicle nearly avoided a collision when using its high beams. When using its low beams, this vehicle avoided a collision.
  • In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams. When using its low beams, this vehicle avoided a collision.

Parallel adult — night

  • In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams. When using its low beams, this vehicle avoided a collision.
  • In the 37 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams and a warning was issued 2 seconds before impact. When using its low beams, this vehicle avoided a collision and a warning was issued 1.3 seconds before impact.

About the pedestrian front crash prevention test

Seat belt reminders

Rating applies to 2022-26 models

Evaluation criteriaRating
Overall evaluation
M
Front row
Unbelted occupant alert (audible & visual)
Initiation time
DurationLong enough (90+ seconds)
Volume
Audio frequency
Second row
Startup status alert (visual)
None
Technical measurements for this test
Background cabin sound pressure level at 24 km/h 52 dB
Audible signal sound pressure level at 24 km/h 68 dB
Difference between background and signal 16.7 dB
Background cabin sound pressure level at 40 km/h 56 dB
Audible signal sound pressure level at 40 km/h 70 dB
Difference between background and signal 13.8 dB
Dominant audio frequency 784 Hz

About the seat belt reminder evaluation

Child seat anchors

Rating applies to 2019-26 models

Evaluation criteriaRating
Overall evaluation
M
Vehicle trimLimited Crew Cab
Seat type leather

This vehicle has 3 rear seating positions with complete child seat attachment (LATCH) hardware.

1 2 3
Rating iconRating
GGood
AAcceptable
MMarginal
PPoor
Seating positions that rely on borrowed lower anchors or have only a tether anchor available are not rated.
thether anchor symbol
Tether anchor
lower anchor symbol
Lower anchors
shared lower achors symbol
Lower anchor(s) can be borrowed from adjacent positions(s)
No hardware available

Details by seating position

PositionRating
1
Tether anchor
hard-to-find location
other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
not too deep in seat
not too much force needed to attach
easy to maneuver around anchors
2
Tether anchor
hard-to-find location
other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
too deep in seat
not too much force needed to attach
easy to maneuver around anchors
3
Tether anchor
hard-to-find location
other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
not too deep in seat
not too much force needed to attach
easy to maneuver around anchors
Technical measurements for this test

Seat position 21

3

Lower anchor A
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 0-2
Force (lbs) 5
Clearance angle (degrees) 75
Lower anchor B
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 0-2
Force (lbs) 2
Clearance angle (degrees) 71
Tether anchor
Location Back wall
Confusing hardware present Yes
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor
No
Tether anchors can be accessed
while seatback is properly positioned
for use of LATCH
Not measured

Seat position 22

2

Lower anchor A
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 2-4
Force (lbs) 13
Clearance angle (degrees) 71
Lower anchor B
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 2-4
Force (lbs) 29
Clearance angle (degrees) 60
Tether anchor
Location Back wall
Confusing hardware present Yes
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor
No
Tether anchors can be accessed
while seatback is properly positioned
for use of LATCH
Not measured

Seat position 23

1

Lower anchor A
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 0-2
Force (lbs) 8
Clearance angle (degrees) 66
Lower anchor B
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 0-2
Force (lbs) 7
Clearance angle (degrees) 66
Tether anchor
Location Back wall
Confusing hardware present Yes
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor
No
Tether anchors can be accessed
while seatback is properly positioned
for use of LATCH
Not measured

About the child seat anchor evaluation