2016 Nissan Quest

minivan

2016 Nissan Quest Minivan
2014 Nissan Quest shown

Crashworthiness

Rating overview
Small overlap front: driver-side
Moderate overlap front: original test
Side: original test
Roof strength
Head restraints & seats

Crash avoidance & mitigation

Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle
Not available

Seat belts & child restraints

LATCH ease of use

Other available safety features

  • Optional blind spot detection

Key

  • G
    Good
  • A
    Acceptable
  • M
    Marginal
  • P
    Poor
  • Superior
  • Advanced
  • Basic

Some ratings use a scale of Poor to Good. Others range from Basic to Superior.

Small overlap front: driver-side

Rating applies to 2011-17 models

Tested vehicle: 2014 Nissan Quest 3.5 SL

The Nissan Quest was redesigned for the 2011 model year.

Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics

Action shot taken during the small overlap frontal crash test.

The dummy's position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was severely compromised.

Extensive intrusion wedged the dummy into a tight space during the crash, and the steering column moved too far upward.

Severe intrusion of the door hinge pillar, instrument panel, and parking brake contributed to a high risk of injuries to the left thigh, left knee, and left lower leg and foot and a moderate risk to the right thigh. The dummy's left leg was trapped between the seat and instrument panel; the seat had to be removed to free the dummy.

Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test ID CEN1445
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm) 59
Footrest (cm) 42
Left toepan (cm) 33
Brake pedal (cm) 30
Parking brake (cm) 40
Rocker panel lateral average (cm) 3
Upper occupant compartment
Steering column 21
Upper hinge pillar max (cm) 48
Upper dash (cm) 47
Lower instrument panel (cm) 41

Driver injury measures

Test ID CEN1445
Head
HIC-15 527
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.7
Extension bending moment (Nm) 22
Maximum Nij 0.28
Chest maximum compression (mm) 21
Femur (kN)
Left 12.3
Right 5.9
Knee displacement (mm)
Left 28
Right 6
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left 63
Right 6
Maximum tibia index
Left 2.29
Right 0.63
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left 1.8
Right 1.3
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 204
Right 80

How the driver-side small overlap front test is conducted

Moderate overlap front: original test

Rating applies to 2011-17 models

Tested vehicle: 2011 Nissan Quest SL

The Nissan Quest was redesigned for the 2011 model year. Frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Nissan as part of frontal crash test verification.

Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Leg/foot, left
Leg/foot, right
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics
Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test ID VTF1016
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm) 10
Left (cm) 10
Center (cm) 13
Right (cm) 12
Brake pedal (cm) 6
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm) 2
Right (cm) 2
Steering column movement
Upward (cm) 8
Rearward (cm) 3
A-pillar rearward movement (cm) 2

Driver injury measures

Test ID VTF1016
Head
HIC-15 281
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.5
Extension bending moment (Nm) 31
Maximum Nij 0.27
Chest maximum compression (mm) 34
Legs
Femur force - left (kN) 4.6
Femur force - right (kN) 2.5
Knee displacement - left (mm) 0
Knee displacement - right (mm) 0
Maximum tibia index - left 0.27
Maximum tibia index - right 0.55
Tibia axial force - left (kN) 1.4
Tibia axial force - right (kN) 1.5
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 55
Right 70

How the moderate overlap front test is conducted

Side: original test

Rating applies to 2016-17 models

Tested vehicle: 2016 Nissan Quest SL

The Nissan Quest was redesigned for the 2011 model year. Beginning with 2016 models, side modifications were made to improve the vehicle's performance in safety compliance tests mandated by the federal government. Side ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2016 Quest conducted by Nissan as part of side crash test verification.

Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis/leg
Driver head protection
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis/leg
Rear passenger head protection
Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test ID VTS1603
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm) -12.0
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.

Driver injury measures

Test ID VTS1603
Head HIC-15 241
Neck
Tension (kN) 2.0
Compression (kN) 0.3
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm) 36
Lateral force (kN) 1.8
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm) 36
Average deflection (mm) 33
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) 2.96
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) 0.45
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN) 2.4
Acetabulum force (kN) 1.5
Combined force (kN) 3.7
Left femur
L-M force (kN) 0.6
L-M moment (Nm) 31
A-P moment (Nm) -109

Passenger injury measures

Test ID VTS1603
Head HIC-15 50
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.5
Compression (kN) 0.1
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm) 27
Lateral force (kN) 1.7
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm) 27
Average deflection (mm) 15
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) 2.40
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) 0.27
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN) 3.7
Acetabulum force (kN) 2.0
Combined force (kN) 5.1
Left femur
L-M force (kN) 0.2
L-M moment (Nm) 9
A-P moment (Nm) -56

How the side crash test is conducted

Roof strength

Rating applies to 2011-17 models

Tested vehicle: 2011 Nissan Quest 3.5 SL

Overall evaluation
Curb weight4,501 lbs
Peak force15,119 lbs
Strength-to-weight ratio3.36

How the roof strength test is conducted

Head restraints & seats

Seat type: Power leather seats

Overall evaluation
Dynamic rating
Seat/head restraint geometry
Technical measurements for this test
Seat type Power leather seats
Geometry
Backset (mm) 55
Distance below top of head (mm) 32
Seat design parameters
Pass/fail Pass
Max T1 acceleration (g) 9.5
Head contact time (ms) 73
Force rating 1
Neck forces
Max neck shear force (N) 26
Max neck tension (N) 359

How the head restraint & seat test is conducted
Currently, IIHS tests apply only to front seats.

Child seat anchors

Rating applies to 2014-17 models

Overall evaluation
Vehicle trim3.5 LE
Seat type leather

This vehicle has 3 rear seating positions with complete child seat attachment (LATCH) hardware.

It has 1 additional seating position with a tether anchor only.

Overall evaluation
Vehicle trim3.5 LE
Seat type leather
1 3 6 4 5
GGood
AAcceptable
MMarginal
PPoor
Seating positions that rely on borrowed lower anchors or have only a tether anchor available are not rated.
thether anchor symbol
Tether anchor
lower anchor symbol
Lower anchors
shared lower achors symbol
Lower anchor(s) can be borrowed from adjacent positions(s)
No hardware available

Details by seating position

1
Tether anchor
hard-to-find location
no other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
too deep in seat
not too much force needed to attach
difficult to maneuver around anchors
3
Tether anchor
hard-to-find location
no other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
too deep in seat
not too much force needed to attach
difficult to maneuver around anchors
4
Tether anchor
easy-to-find location
no other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
too deep in seat
not too much force needed to attach
difficult to maneuver around anchors
5
Tether anchor
easy-to-find location
no other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
none available
Technical measurements for this test

Seat position 21

3

Lower anchor A
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 4-6
Force (lbs) 30
Clearance angle (degrees) 51
Lower anchor B
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 4-6
Force (lbs) 35
Clearance angle (degrees) 50
Tether anchor
Location Bottom seatback
Confusing hardware present No
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor
No
Tether anchors can be accessed
while seatback is properly positioned
for use of LATCH
Not measured

Seat position 23

1

Lower anchor A
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 4-6
Force (lbs) 34
Clearance angle (degrees) 52
Lower anchor B
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 4-6
Force (lbs) 37
Clearance angle (degrees) 50
Tether anchor
Location Bottom seatback
Confusing hardware present No
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor
No
Tether anchors can be accessed
while seatback is properly positioned
for use of LATCH
Not measured

Seat position 32

5

Lower anchor A
No lower latch for this seat position
Lower anchor B
No lower latch for this seat position
Tether anchor
Location Middle seatback
Confusing hardware present No
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor
Yes
Tether anchors can be accessed
while seatback is properly positioned
for use of LATCH
Not measured

Seat position 33

4

Lower anchor A
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 4-6
Force (lbs) 38
Clearance angle (degrees) 47
Lower anchor B
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 6-8
Force (lbs) 36
Clearance angle (degrees) 46
Tether anchor
Location Middle seatback
Confusing hardware present No
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor
Yes
Tether anchors can be accessed
while seatback is properly positioned
for use of LATCH
Not measured

How child seat anchors are evaluated