2017 Nissan Juke

small car / 4-door hatchback

2017 Nissan Juke 4-door hatchback
2014 Nissan Juke shown

Crashworthiness

Rating overview
Small overlap front: driver-side
Moderate overlap front
Side
Roof strength
Head restraints & seats

Crash avoidance & mitigation

Front crash prevention
Not available

Child seat anchors

LATCH ease of use

Key

  • G
    Good
  • A
    Acceptable
  • M
    Marginal
  • P
    Poor
  • Superior
  • Advanced
  • Basic

Some ratings use a scale of Poor to Good. Others range from Basic to Superior.

Small overlap front: driver-side

Rating applies to 2011-17 models

Tested vehicle: 2014 Nissan Juke S 4-door

The Nissan Juke was introduced in the 2011 model year.

Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics
The dummy’s head barely contacted the frontal airbag before sliding off the left side as the steering column moved 17 cm to the right, leaving the head vulnerable to contact with forward side structure and allowing little airbag cushioning for the chest. The side curtain airbag deployed but does not have sufficient forward coverage to protect the head from contact with forward side structure and outside objects. The side torso airbag deployed.

Action shot taken during the small overlap frontal crash test.

The dummy's position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was not maintained well.

During the crash, the dummy's head and torso barely contacted the airbag before sliding off to the left as the steering column moved to the right. The seat belt allowed the dummy to move too far forward, as is evident from the gap between the seat back and the dummy's torso.

Door hinge pillar, door sill, and instrument panel intrusion was extensive and contributed to a high risk of injury to the left lower leg and a significant risk to the left knee.

Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test ID CEN1416
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm) 37
Footrest (cm) 25
Left toepan (cm) 15
Brake pedal (cm) 11
Parking brake (cm)
Rocker panel lateral average (cm) 19
Upper occupant compartment
Steering column 10
Upper hinge pillar max (cm) 24
Upper dash (cm) 26
Lower instrument panel (cm) 27

Driver injury measures

Test ID CEN1416
Head
HIC-15 74
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.8
Extension bending moment (Nm) 6
Maximum Nij 0.15
Chest maximum compression (mm) 24
Femur (kN)
Left 4.9
Right 2.3
Knee displacement (mm)
Left 17
Right 5
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left 3
Right 0
Maximum tibia index
Left 1.64
Right 0.57
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left 1.7
Right 1.7
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 90
Right 50

How the driver-side small overlap front test is conducted

Moderate overlap front

Rating applies to 2011-17 models

Tested vehicle: 2011 Nissan Juke S 4-door

The Nissan Juke was introduced in the 2011 model year and is derived from the Nissan Versa. Two moderate overlap frontal tests of the Juke were conducted, one by the Institute and the other by Nissan as part of frontal crash test verification. Ratings are based on both tests.

Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Leg/foot, left
Leg/foot, right
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics

Action shot taken during the Institute's moderate overlap frontal crash test.

The dummy's position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained well (Institute test car shown).

Smeared greasepaint indicates where the dummy's head contacted the side curtain airbag and dislodged headliner during rebound in the Institute's test.

Intrusion into the driver's space was minimal in both tests, and all leg and foot injury measures were low.

Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test ID VTF1013 CEF1103
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm) 9 7
Left (cm) 13 10
Center (cm) 12 11
Right (cm) 12 10
Brake pedal (cm) 13 8
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm) 1 3
Right (cm) 2 2
Steering column movement
Upward (cm) 3 1
Rearward (cm) -3 -1
A-pillar rearward movement (cm) 2 1

Driver injury measures

Test ID VTF1013 CEF1103
Head
HIC-15 179 397
Peak gs at hard contact no contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.3 1.0
Extension bending moment (Nm) 22 10
Maximum Nij 0.24 0.19
Chest maximum compression (mm) 33 31
Legs
Femur force - left (kN) 3.9 3.3
Femur force - right (kN) 3.1 3.9
Knee displacement - left (mm) 0 5
Knee displacement - right (mm) 10 7
Maximum tibia index - left 0.45 0.34
Maximum tibia index - right 0.41 0.51
Tibia axial force - left (kN) 1.6 1.3
Tibia axial force - right (kN) 1.4 1.7
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 71 79
Right 77 70

How the moderate overlap front test is conducted

Side

Rating applies to 2017 models

Tested vehicle: 2017 Nissan Juke SV 4-door

The Nissan Juke was introduced in the 2011 model year and is derived from the Nissan Versa. Beginning with the 2017 model year, the side curtain airbags and door trim panels were modified.

Two tests of the Juke were conducted, one of a 2011 model by the Institute and the other a 2017 model by Nissan as part of side crash test verification. These vehicles are rated separately, except that the structure ratings for both vehicles are based on both tests.

Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis/leg
Driver head protection
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis/leg
Rear passenger head protection
Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test ID VTS1624 CES1105
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm) -11.0 -10.0
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.

Driver injury measures

Test ID VTS1624
Head HIC-15 232
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.4
Compression (kN) 0.0
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm) 32
Lateral force (kN) 1.7
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm) 33
Average deflection (mm) 28
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) 5.20
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) 0.53
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN) 2.6
Acetabulum force (kN) 2.1
Combined force (kN) 4.7
Left femur
L-M force (kN) 1.0
L-M moment (Nm) 23
A-P moment (Nm) 140

Passenger injury measures

Test ID VTS1624
Head HIC-15 83
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.2
Compression (kN) 1.0
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm) 31
Lateral force (kN) 1.7
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm) 22
Average deflection (mm) 19
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) 3.51
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) 0.30
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN) 1.0
Acetabulum force (kN) 2.7
Combined force (kN) 3.4
Left femur
L-M force (kN) 0.6
L-M moment (Nm) 21
A-P moment (Nm) 49

How the side crash test is conducted

Roof strength

Rating applies to 2011-17 models

Tested vehicle: 2011 Nissan Juke S 4-door

Overall evaluation
Curb weight 2,955 lbs
Peak force 13,191 lbs
Strength-to-weight ratio 4.46

How the roof strength test is conducted

Head restraints & seats

Seat type: Manual cloth seats

Overall evaluation
Dynamic rating
Seat/head restraint geometry
Technical measurements for this test
Seat type Manual cloth seats
Geometry
Backset (mm) 25
Distance below top of head (mm) 44
Seat design parameters
Pass/fail Pass
Max T1 acceleration (g) 12.1
Head contact time (ms) 57
Force rating 1
Neck forces
Max neck shear force (N) 0
Max neck tension (N) 419

How the head restraint & seat test is conducted

Child seat anchors

Applies to 2016-17 models

Overall evaluation
Vehicle trim S
Seat type cloth

This vehicle has 2 rear seating positions with complete child seat attachment (LATCH) hardware.

It has 1 additional seating position with a tether anchor only.

Overall evaluation
Vehicle trim S
Seat type cloth
1 2 3
G Good
A Acceptable
M Marginal
P Poor
Seating positions that rely on borrowed lower anchors or have only a tether anchor available are not rated.
thether anchor symbol
Tether anchor
lower anchor symbol
Lower anchors
shared lower achors symbol
Lower anchor(s) can be borrowed from adjacent positions(s)
No hardware available

Details by seating position

1
Tether anchor
easy-to-find location
no other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
too deep in seat
not too much force needed to attach
easy to maneuver around anchors
2
Tether anchor
easy-to-find location
no other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
none available
3
Tether anchor
easy-to-find location
no other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
too deep in seat
not too much force needed to attach
easy to maneuver around anchors
Technical measurements for this test

Seat position 21

3

Lower anchor A
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 2-4
Force (lbs) 21
Clearance angle (degrees) 71
Lower anchor B
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 2-4
Force (lbs) 12
Clearance angle (degrees) 76
Tether anchor
Location Middle seatback
Confusing hardware present No
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor
Yes

Seat position 22

2

Lower anchor A
No lower latch for this seat position
Lower anchor B
No lower latch for this seat position
Tether anchor
Location Middle seatback
Confusing hardware present No
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor
Yes

Seat position 23

1

Lower anchor A
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 2-4
Force (lbs) 16
Clearance angle (degrees) 73
Lower anchor B
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 2-4
Force (lbs) 17
Clearance angle (degrees) 71
Tether anchor
Location Middle seatback
Confusing hardware present No
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor
Yes

How child seat anchors are evaluated