Small overlap front: driver-side
Rating applies to 2017-22 models
Tested vehicle: 2018 Kia Niro Plug-In Hybrid LX wagon
The Kia Niro was introduced in the 2017 model year and is derived from the Hyundai Ioniq and Elantra. Like the Ioniq, the Niro is a hybrid with both a gasoline engine and electric motor. The Niro Plug-In Hybrid was introduced in the 2018 model year. This variant also uses a gasoline engine and electric motor, but the motor's lithium-ion battery can be charged by connecting it with an electrical cord to a standard household outlet.
Driver-side small overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a Niro Plug-In Hybrid conducted by Hyundai/Kia as part of frontal crash test verification. Ratings apply to both the Niro and Niro Plug-In Hybrid models.
Overall evaluation | |
---|---|
Structure and safety cage | |
Driver injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Chest | |
Hip/thigh | |
Lower leg/foot | |
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics |
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
Test ID | VTN1802 |
---|---|
Lower occupant compartment | |
Lower hinge pillar max (cm) | 6 |
Footrest (cm) | 3 |
Left toepan (cm) | 2 |
Brake pedal (cm) | 4 |
Parking brake (cm) | 12 |
Rocker panel lateral average (cm) | 3 |
Upper occupant compartment | |
Steering column | 0 |
Upper hinge pillar max (cm) | 4 |
Upper dash (cm) | 5 |
Lower instrument panel (cm) | 5 |
Driver injury measures
Test ID | VTN1802 |
---|---|
Head | |
HIC-15 | 157 |
Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
Neck | |
Tension (kN) | 1.1 |
Extension bending moment (Nm) | 10 |
Maximum Nij | 0.22 |
Chest maximum compression (mm) | 31 |
Femur (kN) | |
Left | 1.2 |
Right | 3.2 |
Knee displacement (mm) | |
Left | 2 |
Right | 3 |
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%) | |
Left | 0 |
Right | 1 |
Maximum tibia index | |
Left | 0.32 |
Right | 0.48 |
Tibia axial force (kN) | |
Left | 2.7 |
Right | 1.8 |
Foot acceleration (g) | |
Left | 64 |
Right | 47 |
Small overlap front: passenger-side
Rating applies to 2017-22 models
Tested vehicle: 2018 Kia Niro Plug-In Hybrid LX wagon
The Kia Niro was introduced in the 2017 model year and is derived from the Hyundai Ioniq and Elantra. Like the Ioniq, the Niro is a hybrid with both a gasoline engine and electric motor. The Niro Plug-In Hybrid was introduced in the 2018 model year. This variant also uses a gasoline engine and electric motor, but the motor's lithium-ion battery can be charged by connecting it with an electrical cord to a standard household outlet.
Two passenger-side small overlap frontal tests of the Niro Plug-In Hybrid were conducted, one by the Institute and the other by Hyundai/Kia as part of frontal crash test verification. Ratings are based on both tests and apply to both the Niro and Niro Plug-In Hybrid models.
Overall evaluation | |
---|---|
Structure and safety cage | |
Passenger injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Chest | |
Hip/thigh | |
Lower leg/foot | |
Passenger restraints and dummy kinematics | |
Driver injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Chest | |
Hip/thigh | |
Lower leg/foot | |
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics |
Action shot taken during the Institute's passenger-side small overlap frontal crash test.
The dummy's position in relation to the door frame and dashboard after the crash test indicates that the passenger's survival space was maintained reasonably well (Institute test car shown).
The frontal and side curtain airbags worked well together to keep the head from coming close to any stiff structure or outside objects that could cause injury (Institute test shown).
The passenger's space was maintained reasonably well in both tests, but forces on the right lower leg were just high enough to indicate the possibility of injuries in the test conducted by the Institute (pictured). In the test conducted by Hyundai/Kia, injury risk to both legs and feet was low.
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on passenger side
Test ID | VTP1806 | CEP1817 |
---|---|---|
Lower occupant compartment | ||
Lower hinge pillar max (cm) | 12 | 15 |
Footrest (cm) | 7 | 9 |
Right toepan (cm) | 5 | 6 |
Center toepan (cm) | 3 | 3 |
Rocker panel lateral average (cm) | 1 | 0 |
Upper occupant compartment | ||
Center dash (cm) | 8 | 6 |
Upper hinge pillar max (cm) | 10 | 15 |
Upper dash (cm) | 15 | 10 |
Right lower dash (cm) | 12 | 10 |
Passenger injury measures
Test ID | VTP1806 | CEP1817 |
---|---|---|
Head | ||
HIC-15 | 158 | 118 |
Peak gs at hard contact | no contact | no contact |
Neck | ||
Tension (kN) | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Extension bending moment (Nm) | 18 | 22 |
Maximum Nij | 0.26 | 0.28 |
Chest maximum compression (mm) | 19 | 18 |
Femur (kN) | ||
Left | 1.2 | 0.0 |
Right | 3.1 | 2.1 |
Knee displacement (mm) | ||
Left | 3 | 0 |
Right | 5 | 5 |
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%) | ||
Left | 0 | 0 |
Right | 0 | 0 |
Maximum tibia index | ||
Left | 0.48 | 0.40 |
Right | 0.72 | 0.63 |
Tibia axial force (kN) | ||
Left | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Right | 1.9 | 4.2 |
Foot acceleration (g) | ||
Left | no data | 70 |
Right | 54 | 38 |
Driver injury measures
Test ID | VTP1806 | CEP1817 |
---|---|---|
Head | ||
HIC-15 | 102 | 90 |
Peak gs at hard contact | no contact | no contact |
Neck | ||
Tension (kN) | 0.9 | 0.8 |
Extension bending moment (Nm) | 15 | 19 |
Maximum Nij | 0.18 | 0.16 |
Chest maximum compression (mm) | 35 | 35 |
Femur (kN) | ||
Left | 0.1 | 0.2 |
Right | 0.2 | 0.2 |
Knee displacement (mm) | ||
Left | 2 | 0 |
Right | 1 | 0 |
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%) | ||
Left | 0 | 0 |
Right | 0 | 0 |
Maximum tibia index | ||
Left | 0.34 | 0.27 |
Right | 0.27 | 0.35 |
Tibia axial force (kN) | ||
Left | 0.4 | 0.2 |
Right | 0.8 | 1.1 |
Foot acceleration (g) | ||
Left | 31 | 37 |
Right | 42 | 38 |
How the passenger-side small overlap front test is conducted
Moderate overlap front: original test
Rating applies to 2017-22 models
Tested vehicle: 2018 Kia Niro Plug-In Hybrid LX wagon
The Kia Niro was introduced in the 2017 model year and is derived from the Hyundai Ioniq and Elantra. Like the Ioniq, the Niro is a hybrid with both a gasoline engine and electric motor. The Niro Plug-In Hybrid was introduced in the 2018 model year. This variant also uses a gasoline engine and electric motor, but the motor's lithium-ion battery can be charged by connecting it with an electrical cord to a standard household outlet.
Moderate overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a Niro Plug-In Hybrid conducted by Hyundai/Kia as part of frontal crash test verification. Ratings apply to both the Niro and Niro Plug-In Hybrid models.
Overall evaluation | |
---|---|
Structure and safety cage | |
Driver injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Chest | |
Leg/foot, left | |
Leg/foot, right | |
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics |
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
Test ID | VTF1804 |
---|---|
Footwell intrusion | |
Footrest (cm) | 4 |
Left (cm) | 6 |
Center (cm) | 7 |
Right (cm) | 9 |
Brake pedal (cm) | 9 |
Instrument panel rearward movement | |
Left (cm) | 0 |
Right (cm) | 0 |
Steering column movement | |
Upward (cm) | -3 |
Rearward (cm) | -6 |
A-pillar rearward movement (cm) | 0 |
Driver injury measures
Test ID | VTF1804 |
---|---|
Head | |
HIC-15 | 210 |
Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
Neck | |
Tension (kN) | 0.1 |
Extension bending moment (Nm) | 15 |
Maximum Nij | 0.31 |
Chest maximum compression (mm) | 36 |
Legs | |
Femur force - left (kN) | 1.4 |
Femur force - right (kN) | 0.6 |
Knee displacement - left (mm) | 0 |
Knee displacement - right (mm) | 0 |
Maximum tibia index - left | 0.31 |
Maximum tibia index - right | 0.86 |
Tibia axial force - left (kN) | 1.6 |
Tibia axial force - right (kN) | 3.9 |
Foot acceleration (g) | |
Left | 41 |
Right | 142 |
Side: original test
Rating applies to 2017-22 models
Tested vehicle: 2018 Kia Niro Plug-In Hybrid LX wagon
The Kia Niro was introduced in the 2017 model year and is derived from the Hyundai Ioniq and Elantra. Like the Ioniq, the Niro is a hybrid with both a gasoline engine and electric motor. The Niro Plug-In Hybrid was introduced in the 2018 model year. This variant also uses a gasoline engine and electric motor, but the motor's lithium-ion battery can be charged by connecting it with an electrical cord to a standard household outlet.
Side ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a Niro Plug-In Hybrid conducted by Hyundai/Kia as part of side crash test verification. Ratings apply to both the Niro and Niro Plug-In Hybrid models.
Overall evaluation | |
---|---|
Structure and safety cage | |
Driver injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Torso | |
Pelvis/leg | |
Driver head protection | |
Rear passenger injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Torso | |
Pelvis/leg | |
Rear passenger head protection |
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
Test ID | VTS1803 |
---|---|
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm) | -16.0 |
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline. |
Driver injury measures
Test ID | VTS1803 |
---|---|
Head HIC-15 | 362 |
Neck | |
Tension (kN) | 0.6 |
Compression (kN) | 1.1 |
Shoulder | |
Lateral deflection (mm) | 28 |
Lateral force (kN) | 0.7 |
Torso | |
Maximum deflection (mm) | 28 |
Average deflection (mm) | 26 |
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) | 4.42 |
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) | 0.54 |
Pelvis | |
Iliac force (kN) | 2.0 |
Acetabulum force (kN) | 1.9 |
Combined force (kN) | 3.9 |
Left femur | |
L-M force (kN) | 0.5 |
L-M moment (Nm) | 129 |
A-P moment (Nm) | -29 |
Passenger injury measures
Test ID | VTS1803 |
---|---|
Head HIC-15 | 70 |
Neck | |
Tension (kN) | 0.5 |
Compression (kN) | 0.2 |
Shoulder | |
Lateral deflection (mm) | 36 |
Lateral force (kN) | 1.3 |
Torso | |
Maximum deflection (mm) | 34 |
Average deflection (mm) | 26 |
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) | 4.19 |
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) | 0.49 |
Pelvis | |
Iliac force (kN) | 0.1 |
Acetabulum force (kN) | 1.1 |
Combined force (kN) | 1.1 |
Left femur | |
L-M force (kN) | 0.7 |
L-M moment (Nm) | 186 |
A-P moment (Nm) | 69 |
Roof strength
Rating applies to 2017-22 models
Tested vehicle: 2018 Kia Niro hybrid LX wagon
Rating applies to both the Niro hybrid (tested) and Niro Plug-In Hybrid versions.
Overall evaluation | |
---|---|
Curb weight | 3,138 lbs |
Peak force | 19,696 lbs |
Strength-to-weight ratio | 6.28 |
Head restraints & seats
Seat type: Manual cloth seat
Overall evaluation | |
---|---|
Dynamic rating | |
Seat/head restraint geometry |
Seat type | Manual cloth seat |
---|---|
Geometry | |
Backset (mm) | 42 |
Distance below top of head (mm) | -20 |
Seat design parameters | |
Pass/fail | Pass |
Max T1 acceleration (g) | 10.7 |
Head contact time (ms) | 60 |
Force rating | 1 |
Neck forces | |
Max neck shear force (N) | 23 |
Max neck tension (N) | 555 |
How the head restraint & seat test is conducted
Currently, IIHS tests apply only to front seats.
Headlights
Ratings are given for 2 different headlight variations available on this vehicle.
Trim level(s)
- EX trim equipped with Premium package
- Touring trim
Low-beam headlight type | HID projector |
---|---|
High-beam headlight type | HID projector |
Curve-adaptive? | No |
High-beam assist? | No |
Overall rating | |
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination: |
Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good in all 4 tests.
The low beams never exceeded glare limits.
High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and inadequate on the left side. On curves, visibility was good on the gradual left and both right curves and fair on the sharp left curve.
Trim level(s) |
|
---|---|
Low-beam headlight type | HID projector |
High-beam headlight type | HID projector |
Curve-adaptive? | No |
High-beam assist? | No |
Overall rating Applies to 2017-19 models |
LOW BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
Amount glare exceeded threshold |
---|---|---|
Straightaway right edge | 115.9 m | None |
Straightaway left edge | 74.2 m | None |
250m radius right curve, right edge | 83.4 m | None |
250m radius left curve, left edge | 75.3 m | None |
150m radius right curve, right edge | 67.5 m | None |
150m radius left curve, left edge | 62.3 m | None |
HIGH BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
---|---|
Straightaway right edge | 153.8 m |
Straightaway left edge | 123.4 m |
250m radius right curve, right edge | 85.9 m |
250m radius left curve, left edge | 78.1 m |
150m radius right curve, right edge | 67.3 m |
150m radius left curve, left edge | 63.9 m |
Trim level(s)
- FE trim
- LX trim
- EX trim
Low-beam headlight type | Halogen projector |
---|---|
High-beam headlight type | Halogen projector |
Curve-adaptive? | No |
High-beam assist? | No |
Overall rating | |
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination: |
Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and inadequate on the left side. On curves, visibility was inadequate in all 4 tests.
The low beams never exceeded glare limits.
High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and inadequate on the left side. On curves, visibility was inadequate in all 4 tests.
Trim level(s) |
|
---|---|
Low-beam headlight type | Halogen projector |
High-beam headlight type | Halogen projector |
Curve-adaptive? | No |
High-beam assist? | No |
Overall rating Applies to 2017-19 models |
LOW BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
Amount glare exceeded threshold |
---|---|---|
Straightaway right edge | 109.1 m | None |
Straightaway left edge | 39.1 m | None |
250m radius right curve, right edge | 53.8 m | None |
250m radius left curve, left edge | 40.0 m | None |
150m radius right curve, right edge | 42.3 m | None |
150m radius left curve, left edge | 35.3 m | None |
HIGH BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
---|---|
Straightaway right edge | 146.6 m |
Straightaway left edge | 64.6 m |
250m radius right curve, right edge | 55.9 m |
250m radius left curve, left edge | 47.1 m |
150m radius right curve, right edge | 43.8 m |
150m radius left curve, left edge | 37.2 m |
Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle
Child seat anchors
Rating applies to 2018-22 models
Overall evaluation | |
Vehicle trim | LX |
Seat type | cloth |
This vehicle has 2 rear seating positions with complete child seat attachment (LATCH) hardware.
It has 1 additional seating position with a tether anchor only.
Overall evaluation | |
Vehicle trim | LX |
Seat type | cloth |
G | Good |
A | Acceptable |
M | Marginal |
P | Poor |
Seating positions that rely on borrowed lower anchors or have only a tether anchor available are not rated. | |
thether anchor symbol | Tether anchor |
lower anchor symbol | Lower anchors |
Lower anchor(s) can be borrowed from adjacent positions(s) | |
No hardware available |
Details by seating position
1 | |
---|---|
Tether anchor | |
easy-to-find location | |
no other hardware could be confused for anchor | |
Lower anchors | |
too deep in seat | |
not too much force needed to attach | |
easy to maneuver around anchors | |
2 | |
Tether anchor | |
easy-to-find location | |
no other hardware could be confused for anchor | |
Lower anchors | |
none available | |
3 | |
Tether anchor | |
easy-to-find location | |
no other hardware could be confused for anchor | |
Lower anchors | |
too deep in seat | |
not too much force needed to attach | |
easy to maneuver around anchors |
Seat position 21
Lower anchor A | |
---|---|
Open access rated | No |
Depth (cm) | 2-4 |
Force (lbs) | 16 |
Clearance angle (degrees) | 72 |
Lower anchor B | |
Open access rated | No |
Depth (cm) | 2-4 |
Force (lbs) | 29 |
Clearance angle (degrees) | 75 |
Tether anchor | |
Location | Middle seatback |
Confusing hardware present | Yes |
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor |
Yes |
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH |
Not measured |
Seat position 22
Lower anchor A | |
---|---|
No lower latch for this seat position | |
Lower anchor B | |
No lower latch for this seat position | |
Tether anchor | |
Location | Middle seatback |
Confusing hardware present | Yes |
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor |
Yes |
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH |
Not measured |
Seat position 23
Lower anchor A | |
---|---|
Open access rated | No |
Depth (cm) | 2-4 |
Force (lbs) | 19 |
Clearance angle (degrees) | 71 |
Lower anchor B | |
Open access rated | No |
Depth (cm) | 2-4 |
Force (lbs) | 24 |
Clearance angle (degrees) | 70 |
Tether anchor | |
Location | Middle seatback |
Confusing hardware present | Yes |
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor |
Yes |
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH |
Not measured |