2017 GMC Sierra 1500

large pickup / Crew cab pickup

2017 GMC Sierra 1500 Crew cab pickup
2016 GMC Sierra 1500 shown

Crashworthiness

Rating overview
Small overlap front: driver-side
Moderate overlap front: original test
Side: original test
Roof strength
Head restraints & seats

Crash avoidance & mitigation

Headlights (varies by trim/option)
Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle
Optional system
Not tested

Seat belts & child restraints

LATCH ease of use

Other available safety features

  • Optional lane departure warning
  • Optional lane departure prevention

Key

  • G
    Good
  • A
    Acceptable
  • M
    Marginal
  • P
    Poor
  • Superior
  • Advanced
  • Basic

Some ratings use a scale of Poor to Good. Others range from Basic to Superior.

Small overlap front: driver-side

Rating applies to 2016-18 models

Tested vehicle: 2016 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 LT Crew Cab 2wd

The Chevrolet Silverado 1500 and GMC Sierra 1500 Crew Cab were redesigned for the 2014 model year. Beginning with 2016 models, the vehicle frame was reinforced and the body welds in the door hinge pillar and sill were strengthened to improve occupant protection in small overlap crashes.

Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics

Action shot taken during the driver-side small overlap frontal crash test.

The dummy's position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was not maintained well.

The dummy’s head contacted the frontal airbag but rolled around the left side, allowing the head to approach the intruding A-pillar.

Intrusion of the door hinge pillar, instrument panel, and parking brake pedal (indicated) contributed to a likely risk of injury to the left foot and a significant risk to the left lower leg.

Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test ID CEN1601
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm) 15
Footrest (cm) 30
Left toepan (cm) 26
Brake pedal (cm) 24
Parking brake (cm) 24
Rocker panel lateral average (cm) 6
Upper occupant compartment
Steering column 11
Upper hinge pillar max (cm) 14
Upper dash (cm) 16
Lower instrument panel (cm) 15

Driver injury measures

Test ID CEN1601
Head
HIC-15 80
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.9
Extension bending moment (Nm) 5
Maximum Nij 0.33
Chest maximum compression (mm) 23
Femur (kN)
Left 4.5
Right 4.7
Knee displacement (mm)
Left 2
Right 0
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left 2
Right 2
Maximum tibia index
Left 1.07
Right 0.51
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left 6.0
Right 3.2
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 324
Right 114

About the small overlap front test

Moderate overlap front: original test

Rating applies to 2014-18 models

Tested vehicle: 2014 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 High Country Crew Cab 2wd

The Chevrolet Silverado 1500 and GMC Sierra 1500 Crew Cab were redesigned for the 2014 model year. Moderate overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by General Motors.

Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Leg/foot, left
Leg/foot, right
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics
Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test ID VTF1226
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm) 5
Left (cm) 8
Center (cm) 18
Right (cm) 6
Brake pedal (cm) 2
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm) 1
Right (cm) 2
Steering column movement
Upward (cm) 3
Rearward (cm) -1
A-pillar rearward movement (cm) 0

Driver injury measures

Test ID VTF1226
Head
HIC-15 349
Peak gs at hard contact 84
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.0
Extension bending moment (Nm) 21
Maximum Nij 0.38
Chest maximum compression (mm) 23
Legs
Femur force - left (kN) 0.2
Femur force - right (kN) 0.4
Knee displacement - left (mm) 0
Knee displacement - right (mm) 1
Maximum tibia index - left 0.36
Maximum tibia index - right 0.45
Tibia axial force - left (kN) 2.3
Tibia axial force - right (kN) 1.8
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 81
Right 64

About the original moderate overlap front test

Side: original test

Rating applies to 2014-18 models

Tested vehicle: 2015 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 LT Crew Cab 2wd

The Chevrolet Silverado 1500 and GMC Sierra 1500 Crew Cab were redesigned for the 2014 model year.

Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis/leg
Driver head protection
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis/leg
Rear passenger head protection

View of the vehicle and barrier just after the crash test.

View of the vehicle after the crash with doors removed, showing the side airbags and damage to the occupant compartment.

Smeared greasepaint shows where the driver dummy's head was protected from being hit by hard structures by the side curtain airbag.

Smeared greasepaint shows where the rear passenger dummy’s head was protected by the side airbag.

Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test ID CES1603
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm) -14.5
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.

Driver injury measures

Test ID CES1603
Head HIC-15 97
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.6
Compression (kN) 1.0
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm) 33
Lateral force (kN) 1.4
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm) 26
Average deflection (mm) 23
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) 1.93
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) 0.29
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN) 1.7
Acetabulum force (kN) 2.7
Combined force (kN) 4.3
Left femur
L-M force (kN) 0.9
L-M moment (Nm) 95
A-P moment (Nm) 16

Passenger injury measures

Test ID CES1603
Head HIC-15 80
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.2
Compression (kN) 0.2
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm) 15
Lateral force (kN) 0.7
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm) 26
Average deflection (mm) 22
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) 2.92
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) 0.35
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN) 0.9
Acetabulum force (kN) 2.5
Combined force (kN) 3.0
Left femur
L-M force (kN) 0.3
L-M moment (Nm) 87
A-P moment (Nm) -33

About the original side crash test

Roof strength

Rating applies to 2014-18 models

Tested vehicle: 2015 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 LS Crew Cab 2wd

Overall evaluation
Curb weight5,171 lbs
Peak force21,184 lbs
Strength-to-weight ratio4.10

About the roof strength test

Head restraints & seats

Seat type: Manual cloth seat

Overall evaluation
Dynamic rating
Seat/head restraint geometry
Technical measurements for this test
Seat type Manual cloth seat
Geometry
Backset (mm) 29
Distance below top of head (mm) 35
Seat design parameters
Pass/fail Pass
Max T1 acceleration (g) 14.5
Head contact time (ms) 54
Force rating 1
Neck forces
Max neck shear force (N) 0
Max neck tension (N) 405

About the head restraint & seat test
Currently, IIHS tests apply only to front seats.

Headlights

Ratings are given for 4 different headlight variations available on this vehicle.

Trim level(s)

  • SLT trim equipped with Premium Plus package
  • Denali trim equipped with Enhanced Driver Alert package
  • Denali trim equipped with Intellibeam Headlights package
Low-beam headlight typeLED projector
High-beam headlight typeLED projector
Curve-adaptive?No
High-beam assist?Yes
Overall rating
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:
car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler 0 ft 100 ft 200 ft 300 ft 400 ft 500 ft 600 ft Low beams Optimal low-beam illumination High beams Optimal high-beam illumination High-beam assist credit

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was fair on the left side of the road and inadequate on the right side. On curves, visibility was good on the sharp left and both right curves and inadequate on the gradual left curve.

The low beams never exceeded glare limits.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the left side of the road and inadequate on the right side. On curves, visibility was fair on the sharp left and both right curves and inadequate on the gradual left curve.

High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway, on the gradual left curve and on the gradual right curve.

Technical measurements for this test
Trim level(s)
  • SLT trim equipped with Premium Plus package
  • Denali trim equipped with Enhanced Driver Alert package
  • Denali trim equipped with Intellibeam Headlights package
Low-beam headlight type LED projector
High-beam headlight type LED projector
Curve-adaptive? No
High-beam assist? Yes
Overall rating
Applies to 2016-18 models
LOW BEAMS Average minimum useful
illumination distance (5 lux)
Amount glare
exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge 75.0 m None
Straightaway left edge 47.1 m None
250m radius right curve, right edge 68.7 m None
250m radius left curve, right edge 49.2 m None
150m radius right curve, right edge 56.1 m None
150m radius left curve, left edge 56.9 m None
HIGH BEAMS Average minimum useful
illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge 109.1 m
Straightaway left edge 148.6 m
250m radius right curve, right edge 69.1 m
250m radius left curve, left edge 63.2 m
150m radius right curve, right edge 55.3 m
150m radius left curve, left edge 56.6 m

Trim level(s)

  • Denali trim
Low-beam headlight typeLED projector
High-beam headlight typeLED projector
Curve-adaptive?No
High-beam assist?No
Overall rating
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:
car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler 0 ft 100 ft 200 ft 300 ft 400 ft 500 ft 600 ft Low beams Optimal low-beam illumination High beams Optimal high-beam illumination

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was fair on the left side of the road and inadequate on the right side. On curves, visibility was good on the sharp left and both right curves and inadequate on the gradual left curve.

The low beams never exceeded glare limits.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the left side of the road and inadequate on the right side. On curves, visibility was fair on the sharp left and both right curves and inadequate on the gradual left curve.

Technical measurements for this test
Trim level(s)
  • Denali trim
Low-beam headlight type LED projector
High-beam headlight type LED projector
Curve-adaptive? No
High-beam assist? No
Overall rating
Applies to 2016-18 models
LOW BEAMS Average minimum useful
illumination distance (5 lux)
Amount glare
exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge 75.0 m None
Straightaway left edge 47.1 m None
250m radius right curve, right edge 68.7 m None
250m radius left curve, right edge 49.2 m None
150m radius right curve, right edge 56.1 m None
150m radius left curve, left edge 56.9 m None
HIGH BEAMS Average minimum useful
illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge 109.1 m
Straightaway left edge 148.6 m
250m radius right curve, right edge 69.1 m
250m radius left curve, left edge 63.2 m
150m radius right curve, right edge 55.3 m
150m radius left curve, left edge 56.6 m

Trim level(s)

  • Sierra trim
  • SLE trim
  • SLT trim
Low-beam headlight typeHID projector
High-beam headlight typeHID projector
Curve-adaptive?No
High-beam assist?No
Overall rating
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:
car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler 0 ft 100 ft 200 ft 300 ft 400 ft 500 ft 600 ft Low beams Optimal low-beam illumination High beams Optimal high-beam illumination Excessive glare

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was fair on both left curves and inadequate on both right curves.

The low beams created excessive glare.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was fair on the right side of the road and inadequate on the left side. On curves, visibility was inadequate in all 4 tests.

Technical measurements for this test
Trim level(s)
  • Sierra trim
  • SLE trim
  • SLT trim
Low-beam headlight type HID projector
High-beam headlight type HID projector
Curve-adaptive? No
High-beam assist? No
Overall rating
Applies to 2016-18 models
LOW BEAMS Average minimum useful
illumination distance (5 lux)
Amount glare
exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge 123.6 m 101.6%
Straightaway left edge 81.7 m 101.6%
250m radius right curve, right edge 53.8 m 256.2%
250m radius left curve, left edge 55.1 m 119.5%
150m radius right curve, right edge 43.8 m 313.7%
150m radius left curve, left edge 46.4 m 130.8%
HIGH BEAMS Average minimum useful
illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge 138.0 m
Straightaway left edge 121.7 m
250m radius right curve, right edge 53.3 m
250m radius left curve, left edge 55.9 m
150m radius right curve, right edge 43.4 m
150m radius left curve, left edge 46.2 m

Trim level(s)

  • SLT trim equipped with Enhanced Driver Alert package
  • SLE trim equipped with Enhanced Driver Alert package
  • SLT trim equipped with Intellibeam package
Low-beam headlight typeHID projector
High-beam headlight typeHID projector
Curve-adaptive?No
High-beam assist?Yes
Overall rating
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:
car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler 0 ft 100 ft 200 ft 300 ft 400 ft 500 ft 600 ft Low beams Optimal low-beam illumination High beams Optimal high-beam illumination High-beam assist credit Excessive glare

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was fair on both left curves and inadequate on both right curves.

The low beams created excessive glare.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was fair on the right side of the road and inadequate on the left side. On curves, visibility was inadequate in all 4 tests.

High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the gradual left curve.

Technical measurements for this test
Trim level(s)
  • SLT trim equipped with Enhanced Driver Alert package
  • SLE trim equipped with Enhanced Driver Alert package
  • SLT trim equipped with Intellibeam package
Low-beam headlight type HID projector
High-beam headlight type HID projector
Curve-adaptive? No
High-beam assist? Yes
Overall rating
Applies to 2016-18 models
LOW BEAMS Average minimum useful
illumination distance (5 lux)
Amount glare
exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge 123.6 m 101.6%
Straightaway left edge 81.7 m 101.6%
250m radius right curve, right edge 53.8 m 256.2%
250m radius left curve, left edge 55.1 m 119.5%
150m radius right curve, right edge 43.8 m 313.7%
150m radius left curve, left edge 46.4 m 130.8%
HIGH BEAMS Average minimum useful
illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge 138.0 m
Straightaway left edge 121.7 m
250m radius right curve, right edge 53.3 m
250m radius left curve, left edge 55.9 m
150m radius right curve, right edge 43.4 m
150m radius left curve, left edge 46.2 m

About the headlight evaluation

Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle

System details

  • Optional Low Speed Forward Automatic Braking

Package name

  • Optional Enhanced Driver Alert Package

Overall evaluation

Applies to 2017-18 models

  • This system meets the requirements for forward collision warning.
  • Autobrake not tested.

About the original front crash prevention test

Child seat anchors

Rating applies to 2015-18 models

Overall evaluation
Vehicle trimSLT Crew Cab
Seat type leather

This vehicle has 2 rear seating positions with complete child seat attachment (LATCH) hardware.

It has 1 additional seating position with a tether anchor only.

Overall evaluation
Vehicle trimSLT Crew Cab
Seat type leather
1 2 3
GGood
AAcceptable
MMarginal
PPoor
Seating positions that rely on borrowed lower anchors or have only a tether anchor available are not rated.
thether anchor symbol
Tether anchor
lower anchor symbol
Lower anchors
shared lower achors symbol
Lower anchor(s) can be borrowed from adjacent positions(s)
No hardware available

Details by seating position

1
Tether anchor
hard-to-find location
other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
too deep in seat
not too much force needed to attach
difficult to maneuver around anchors
2
Tether anchor
hard-to-find location
other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
none available
3
Tether anchor
hard-to-find location
other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
too deep in seat
too much force needed to attach
difficult to maneuver around anchors
Technical measurements for this test

Seat position 21

3

Lower anchor A
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 2-4
Force (lbs) 45
Clearance angle (degrees) 48
Lower anchor B
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 2-4
Force (lbs) 24
Clearance angle (degrees) 48
Tether anchor
Location Back wall
Confusing hardware present Yes
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor
No
Tether anchors can be accessed
while seatback is properly positioned
for use of LATCH
Not measured

Seat position 22

2

Lower anchor A
No lower latch for this seat position
Lower anchor B
No lower latch for this seat position
Tether anchor
Location Back wall
Confusing hardware present Yes
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor
No
Tether anchors can be accessed
while seatback is properly positioned
for use of LATCH
Not measured

Seat position 23

1

Lower anchor A
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 2-4
Force (lbs) 36
Clearance angle (degrees) 54
Lower anchor B
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 2-4
Force (lbs) 35
Clearance angle (degrees) 53
Tether anchor
Location Back wall
Confusing hardware present Yes
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor
No
Tether anchors can be accessed
while seatback is properly positioned
for use of LATCH
Not measured

About the child seat anchor evaluation