2023 Chevrolet Tahoe

large SUV / 4-door SUV

2023 Chevrolet Tahoe 4-door SUV

Crashworthiness

Rating overview
Evaluation criteriaRating
Small overlap front: driver-side
G
Small overlap front: passenger-side
A
Moderate overlap front: original test
G
Moderate overlap front: updated test
P
Side: updated test
G

Crash avoidance & mitigation

Evaluation criteriaRating
Headlights
P
Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle 2.0
Standard system
P
Front crash prevention: pedestrian
Standard system
M

Seat belts & child restraints

Evaluation criteriaRating
Seat belt reminders
A
LATCH ease of use
G
+

Other available safety features

  • Optional blind spot detection
  • Standard lane departure warning & prevention
  • Optional rear automatic braking

Key

GGood
AAcceptable
MMarginal
PPoor

Small overlap front: driver-side

Tested vehicle: 2023 Chevrolet Tahoe LT 4-door 4wd
Rating applies to 2023-25 models

The Chevrolet Tahoe was redesigned for the 2021 model year.

Evaluation criteriaRating
Overall evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
G
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Hip/thigh
G
Lower leg/foot
M
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics
G
Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Evaluation criteriaMeasurement
Test ID CEN2403
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm) 6
Footrest (cm) 17
Left toepan (cm) 17
Brake pedal (cm) 6
Parking brake (cm)
Rocker panel lateral average (cm) 3
Upper occupant compartment
Steering column 0
Upper hinge pillar max (cm) 3
Upper dash (cm) 3
Lower instrument panel (cm) 4

Driver injury measures

Evaluation criteriaMeasurement
Test ID CEN2403
Head
HIC-15 181
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.3
Extension bending moment (Nm) 18
Maximum Nij 0.25
Chest maximum compression (mm) 27
Femur (kN)
Left 1.1
Right 0.2
Knee displacement (mm)
Left 0
Right 3
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left 0
Right 0
Maximum tibia index
Left 0.45
Right 1.01
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left 2.0
Right 2.5
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 80
Right 56

About the small overlap front test

Small overlap front: passenger-side

Tested vehicle: 2023 Chevrolet Tahoe LT 4-door 4wd
Rating applies to 2023-25 models

The Chevrolet Tahoe was redesigned for the 2021 model year.

Evaluation criteriaRating
Overall evaluation
A
Structure and safety cage
M
Passenger injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Hip/thigh
G
Lower leg/foot
M
Passenger restraints and dummy kinematics
G
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Hip/thigh
G
Lower leg/foot
G
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics
G
Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on passenger side

Evaluation criteriaMeasurement
Test ID CEP2402
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm) 18
Footrest (cm) 32
Right toepan (cm) 25
Center toepan (cm) 12
Rocker panel lateral average (cm) 3
Upper occupant compartment
Center dash (cm) 6
Upper hinge pillar max (cm) 10
Upper dash (cm) 10
Right lower dash (cm) 18

Passenger injury measures

Evaluation criteriaMeasurement
Test ID CEP2402
Head
HIC-15 139
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.9
Extension bending moment (Nm) 17
Maximum Nij 0.23
Chest maximum compression (mm) 17
Femur (kN)
Left 2.5
Right 2.9
Knee displacement (mm)
Left 10
Right 3
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left 0
Right 0
Maximum tibia index
Left 0.82
Right 0.64
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left 3.5
Right 3.8
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 73
Right 207

Driver injury measures

Evaluation criteriaMeasurement
Test ID CEP2402
Head
HIC-15 84
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.6
Extension bending moment (Nm) 7
Maximum Nij 0.13
Chest maximum compression (mm) 25
Femur (kN)
Left 0.0
Right 0.0
Knee displacement (mm)
Left 0
Right 0
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left 0
Right 0
Maximum tibia index
Left 0.59
Right 0.15
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left 0.2
Right 0.2
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 68
Right 56

About the small overlap front test

Moderate overlap front: original test

Tested vehicle: 2023 Chevrolet Tahoe LT 4-door 4wd
Rating applies to 2023-25 models

The Chevrolet Tahoe was redesigned for the 2021 model year.

Evaluation criteriaRating
Overall evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
G
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Leg/foot, left
G
Leg/foot, right
G
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics
G
Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Evaluation criteriaMeasurement
Test ID CEF2407
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm) 8
Left (cm) 13
Center (cm) 11
Right (cm) 7
Brake pedal (cm) 4
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm) 1
Right (cm) 1
Steering column movement
Upward (cm) 2
Rearward (cm) 0
A-pillar rearward movement (cm) 0

Driver injury measures

Evaluation criteria Measurement
Test ID CEF2407
Head
HIC-15 158
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.0
Extension bending moment (Nm) 12
Maximum Nij 0.21
Chest maximum compression (mm) 26
Legs
Femur force - left (kN) 0.2
Femur force - right (kN) 0.1
Knee displacement - left (mm) 0
Knee displacement - right (mm) 0
Maximum tibia index - left 0.36
Maximum tibia index - right 0.36
Tibia axial force - left (kN) 1.9
Tibia axial force - right (kN) 1.1
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 40
Right 119

About the original moderate overlap front test

Moderate overlap front: updated test

Tested vehicle: 2023 Chevrolet Tahoe LT 4-door 4wd
Rating applies to 2023-25 models

The Chevrolet Tahoe was redesigned for the 2021 model year.

Evaluation criteriaRating
Overall evaluation
P
Structure and safety cage
G
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Thigh/hip
G
Leg/foot
G
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics
G
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
P
Chest
M
Thigh
G
Rear passenger restraints and dummy kinematics
M
Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Evaluation criteriaMeasurement
Test IDCEF2407
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm)8
Left (cm)13
Center (cm)11
Right (cm)7
Brake pedal (cm)4
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm)1
Right (cm)1
Steering column movement
Upward (cm)2
Rearward (cm)0
A-pillar rearward movement (cm)0

Driver injury measures

Evaluation criteriaMeasurement
Test IDCEF2407
Head
HIC-15158
Peak gs at hard contactno contact
Neck
Tension (kN)1.0
Extension bending moment (Nm)12
Maximum Nij0.21
Chest maximum compression (mm)26
Femur (kN)
Left0.2
Right0.1
Knee displacement (mm)
Left0
Right0
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left0
Right0
Maximum tibia index
Left0.36
Right0.36
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left1.9
Right1.1
Foot acceleration (g)
Left40
Right119

Rear passenger injury measures

Test IDCEF2407
Head
HIC-15 for head contact during forward excursion
no contact
Peak gs at hard contactno contact
Neck
Tension (kN)2.9
Compression (kN)0.4
Maximum Nij for head contact during forward excursion
no contact
Chest
Chest index41
Shoulder belt tension (kN)6.5
Thigh (kN)
Left femur compression0.3
Right femur compression0.3

About the moderate overlap front test

February 2024 adjustment to rating criteria

Side: updated test

Tested vehicle: 2024 Chevrolet Tahoe Z71 4-door 4wd
Rating applies to 2023-25 models

The Chevrolet Tahoe was redesigned for the 2021 model year.

Evaluation criteriaRating
Overall evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
G
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
G
Torso
G
Pelvis
G
Driver head protection
G
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
G
Torso
G
Pelvis
G
Rear passenger head protection
G
Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Evaluation criteria Measurement
Test ID CES2404
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm) -28.5
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.

Driver injury measures

Evaluation criteria Measurement
Test ID CES2404
Head
HIC-15 17
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.4
Compression (kN) 0.3
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm) 8
Lateral force (kN) 0.4
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm) 11
Average deflection (mm) 10
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) 1.29
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) 0.04
Pelvis
Combined force (kN) 1.3

Passenger injury measures

Evaluation criteria Measurement
Test ID CES2404
Head
HIC-15 197
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.1
Compression (kN) 1.3
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm) 22
Lateral force (kN) 1.0
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm) 23
Average deflection (mm) 16
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) 1.81
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) 0.20
Pelvis
Combined force (kN) 0.6

About the side crash test

Headlights

Trim level(s): All trims

Evaluation criteriaRating
Low-beam headlight typeLED reflector
High-beam headlight typeLED reflector
Curve-adaptive?No
High-beam assist?Yes
Overall rating
P
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:
car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler 0 ft 100 ft 200 ft 300 ft 400 ft 500 ft 600 ft Low beams Optimal low-beam illumination High beams Optimal high-beam illumination High-beam assist credit Excessive glare

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the left side of the road and inadequate on the right side. On curves, visibility was fair on the sharp left and both right curves and inadequate on the gradual left curve.

The low beams created excessive glare.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and fair on the left side. On curves, visibility was fair on the gradual right curve and inadequate on the sharp right and both left curves.

High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway and all 4 curves.

Technical measurements for this test
Evaluation criteria Measurement
Trim level(s)
  • All trims
Low-beam headlight type LED reflector
High-beam headlight type LED reflector
Curve-adaptive? No
High-beam assist? Yes
Overall rating
Applies to 2023-24 models
P
LOW BEAMS Average minimum useful
illumination distance (5 lux)
Amount glare
exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge 77.3 m 95.9%
Straightaway left edge 57.7 m 95.9%
250m radius right curve, right edge 56.6 m 33.3%
250m radius left curve, left edge 53.2 m 113.3%
150m radius right curve, right edge 48.7 m 51.9%
150m radius left curve, left edge 46.3 m 143.7%
HIGH BEAMS Average minimum useful
illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge 155.2 m
Straightaway left edge 131.1 m
250m radius right curve, right edge 65.5 m
250m radius left curve, left edge 60.2 m
150m radius right curve, right edge 50.4 m
150m radius left curve, left edge 47.6 m

About the headlight evaluation

Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle 2.0

System details

  • standard Automatic Emergency Braking/Front Pedestrian Braking
Evaluation criteriaRating
Overall evaluation
P
Rating applies to all 2023-24 models

Passenger car target

Test runSpeed reductionTimely warning?
31 mph/target centeredCollision avoided
31 mph/target off-centerCollision avoided
37 mph/target centered16 mph
37 mph/target off-centerAutobrake not tested
43 mph/target centeredAutobrake not tested
43 mph/target off-centerAutobrake not tested

Motorcycle target

Test runSpeed reductionTimely warning?
31 mph/target centered10 mph
31 mph/target off-centerAutobrake not tested
37 mph/target centeredAutobrake not tested
37 mph/target off-centerAutobrake not tested
43 mph/target centeredAutobrake not tested
43 mph/target off-centerAutobrake not tested

Semitrailer

Only warning is tested with the semitrailer.

Test runTimely warning?
31 mph/target centered
37 mph/target centered
43 mph/target centered

About the front crash prevention test

Front crash prevention: pedestrian

System details

  • standard Automatic Emergency Braking/Front Pedestrian Braking
Evaluation criteriaRating
Overall evaluation
M
Includes high-beam assist credit
Rating applies to all 2023-24 models

Crossing child — day

  • In the 12 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
  • In the 25 mph test, impact speed was reduced by 21 mph.

Crossing adult — night

  • In the 12 mph test, impact speed was reduced by 3 mph when using its high beams. When using its low beams, this vehicle failed to slow.
  • In the 25 mph test, impact speed was reduced by 14 mph when using its high beams. When using its low beams, impact speed was reduced by 2 mph.

Parallel adult — night

  • In the 25 mph test, impact speed was reduced by 24 mph when using its high beams. When using its low beams, impact speed was reduced by 22 mph.
  • In the 37 mph test, impact speed was reduced by 18 mph when using its high beams and a warning was issued 1.6 seconds before impact. When using its low beams, impact speed was reduced by 10 mph and a warning was issued 1.5 seconds before impact.

About the pedestrian front crash prevention test

Seat belt reminders

Rating applies to 2023-25 models

Evaluation criteriaRating
Overall evaluation
A
Front row
Unbelted occupant alert (audible & visual)
Initiation time
DurationLong enough (90+ seconds)
Volume
Audio frequency
Second row
Startup status alert (visual)
None
Technical measurements for this test
Background cabin sound pressure level at 24 km/h 51 dB
Audible signal sound pressure level at 24 km/h 71 dB
Difference between background and signal 19.7 dB
Background cabin sound pressure level at 40 km/h 54 dB
Audible signal sound pressure level at 40 km/h 71 dB
Difference between background and signal 17.1 dB
Dominant audio frequency 784 Hz

About the seat belt reminder evaluation

Child seat anchors

Rating applies to 2023-25 models

Evaluation criteriaRating
Overall evaluation
G
+
extra LATCH positions
Vehicle trimLT
Seat type leatherette

This vehicle has 3 rear seating positions with complete child seat attachment (LATCH) hardware. It has 3 additional seating positions with a tether anchor only.

1 2 3 6 4 5
Rating iconRating
GGood
AAcceptable
MMarginal
PPoor
Seating positions that rely on borrowed lower anchors or have only a tether anchor available are not rated.
thether anchor symbol
Tether anchor
lower anchor symbol
Lower anchors
shared lower achors symbol
Lower anchor(s) can be borrowed from adjacent positions(s)
No hardware available

Details by seating position

PositionRating
1
Tether anchor
easy-to-find location
no other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
not too deep in seat
not too much force needed to attach
easy to maneuver around anchors
2
Tether anchor
hard-to-find location
no other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
not too deep in seat
not too much force needed to attach
easy to maneuver around anchors
3
Tether anchor
easy-to-find location
no other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
not too deep in seat
not too much force needed to attach
easy to maneuver around anchors
4
Tether anchor
easy-to-find location
no other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
none available
5
Tether anchor
easy-to-find location
no other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
none available
6
Tether anchor
easy-to-find location
no other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
none available
Technical measurements for this test

Seat position 21

3

Lower anchor A
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) -2-0
Force (lbs) 7
Clearance angle (degrees) 94
Lower anchor B
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) -2-0
Force (lbs) 7
Clearance angle (degrees) 95
Tether anchor
Location Middle seatback
Confusing hardware present No
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor
Yes
Tether anchors can be accessed
while seatback is properly positioned
for use of LATCH
Not measured

Seat position 22

2

Lower anchor A
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 0-2
Force (lbs) 17
Clearance angle (degrees) 82
Lower anchor B
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 0-2
Force (lbs) 12
Clearance angle (degrees) 84
Tether anchor
Location Other
Confusing hardware present No
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor
Yes
Tether anchors can be accessed
while seatback is properly positioned
for use of LATCH
Not measured

Seat position 23

1

Lower anchor A
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 0-2
Force (lbs) 12
Clearance angle (degrees) 89
Lower anchor B
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 0-2
Force (lbs) 9
Clearance angle (degrees) 92
Tether anchor
Location Middle seatback
Confusing hardware present No
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor
Yes
Tether anchors can be accessed
while seatback is properly positioned
for use of LATCH
Not measured

Seat position 31

6

Lower anchor A
No lower latch for this seat position
Lower anchor B
No lower latch for this seat position
Tether anchor
Location Middle seatback
Confusing hardware present Yes
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor
Yes
Tether anchors can be accessed
while seatback is properly positioned
for use of LATCH
Not measured

Seat position 32

5

Lower anchor A
No lower latch for this seat position
Lower anchor B
No lower latch for this seat position
Tether anchor
Location Middle seatback
Confusing hardware present Yes
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor
Yes
Tether anchors can be accessed
while seatback is properly positioned
for use of LATCH
Not measured

Seat position 33

4

Lower anchor A
No lower latch for this seat position
Lower anchor B
No lower latch for this seat position
Tether anchor
Location Middle seatback
Confusing hardware present Yes
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor
Yes
Tether anchors can be accessed
while seatback is properly positioned
for use of LATCH
Not measured

About the child seat anchor evaluation