2019 Chevrolet Blazer

midsize SUV / 4-door SUV

2019 Chevrolet Blazer 4-door SUV
Photo courtesy of General Motors Corporation

Crashworthiness

Rating overview
Small overlap front: driver-side
Small overlap front: passenger-side
Moderate overlap front
Side: original test
Roof strength
Head restraints & seats

Crash avoidance & mitigation

Headlights
Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle
Optional system
Superior
Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-pedestrian (day)
Optional system
Advanced

Seat belts & child restraints

LATCH ease of use

Other available safety features

  • Standard daytime running lights
  • Optional blind spot detection
  • Optional lane departure warning
  • Optional lane departure prevention

Key

  • G
    Good
  • A
    Acceptable
  • M
    Marginal
  • P
    Poor
  • Superior
  • Advanced
  • Basic

Some ratings use a scale of Poor to Good. Others range from Basic to Superior.

Small overlap front: driver-side

Rating applies to 2019-22 models

Tested vehicle: 2020 Chevrolet Blazer 4-door 4wd

The Chevrolet Blazer was reintroduced in the 2019 model year.

Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics

Action shot taken during the driver-side small overlap frontal crash test.

The dummy's position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained very well.

The driver's space was maintained well, and risk of injuries to the dummy's legs and feet was very low.

The frontal and side curtain airbags worked well together to keep the head from coming close to any stiff structure or outside objects that could cause injury.

Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test ID CEN2007
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm) 1
Footrest (cm) 1
Left toepan (cm) 5
Brake pedal (cm) 2
Parking brake (cm)
Rocker panel lateral average (cm) 1
Upper occupant compartment
Steering column 0
Upper hinge pillar max (cm) 1
Upper dash (cm) 1
Lower instrument panel (cm) 0

Driver injury measures

Test ID CEN2007
Head
HIC-15 90
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.6
Extension bending moment (Nm) 7
Maximum Nij 0.15
Chest maximum compression (mm) 19
Femur (kN)
Left 0.2
Right 0.1
Knee displacement (mm)
Left 0
Right 0
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left 0
Right 0
Maximum tibia index
Left 0.68
Right 0.58
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left 0.9
Right 1.1
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 42
Right 44

How the driver-side small overlap front test is conducted

Small overlap front: passenger-side

Rating applies to 2019-22 models

Tested vehicle: 2020 Chevrolet Blazer Premiere 4-door 4wd

The Chevrolet Blazer was reintroduced in the 2019 model year. Passenger-side small overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2020 Chevrolet Blazer conducted by General Motors as part of frontal crash test verification.

Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Passenger injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Passenger restraints and dummy kinematics
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics
Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on passenger side

Test ID VTP2023
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm) 11
Footrest (cm) 3
Right toepan (cm) 2
Center toepan (cm) 3
Rocker panel lateral average (cm) 2
Upper occupant compartment
Center dash (cm) 5
Upper hinge pillar max (cm) 9
Upper dash (cm) 9
Right lower dash (cm) 12

Passenger injury measures

Test ID VTP2023
Head
HIC-15 90
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.1
Extension bending moment (Nm) 7
Maximum Nij 0.21
Chest maximum compression (mm) 18
Femur (kN)
Left 1.5
Right 0.7
Knee displacement (mm)
Left 3
Right 2
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left 0
Right 0
Maximum tibia index
Left 0.59
Right 0.59
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left 1.0
Right 1.1
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 42
Right 28

Driver injury measures

Test ID VTP2023
Head
HIC-15 50
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.0
Extension bending moment (Nm) 46
Maximum Nij 0.45
Chest maximum compression (mm) 16
Femur (kN)
Left 0.5
Right 0.3
Knee displacement (mm)
Left 1
Right 2
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left 0
Right 0
Maximum tibia index
Left 0.31
Right 0.27
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left 1.0
Right 0.6
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 22
Right 39

How the passenger-side small overlap front test is conducted

Moderate overlap front

Rating applies to 2019-22 models

Tested vehicle: 2019 Chevrolet Blazer Premier 4-door 4wd

The Chevrolet Blazer was reintroduced in the 2019 model year. Moderate overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2019 Chevrolet Blazer conducted by General Motors as part of frontal crash test verification.

Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Leg/foot, left
Leg/foot, right
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics
Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test ID VTF1907
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm) 3
Left (cm) 6
Center (cm) 8
Right (cm) 11
Brake pedal (cm) 3
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm) 0
Right (cm) 0
Steering column movement
Upward (cm) -1
Rearward (cm) -7
A-pillar rearward movement (cm) 0

Driver injury measures

Test ID VTF1907
Head
HIC-15 136
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.1
Extension bending moment (Nm) 6
Maximum Nij 0.17
Chest maximum compression (mm) 23
Legs
Femur force - left (kN) 0.4
Femur force - right (kN) 1.9
Knee displacement - left (mm) 0
Knee displacement - right (mm) 1
Maximum tibia index - left 0.47
Maximum tibia index - right 0.48
Tibia axial force - left (kN) 2.4
Tibia axial force - right (kN) 4.1
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 40
Right 69

How the moderate overlap front test is conducted

Side: original test

Rating applies to 2019-22 models

Tested vehicle: 2019 Chevrolet Blazer Premier 4-door 4wd

The Chevrolet Blazer was reintroduced in the 2019 model year. Side ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2019 Chevrolet Blazer conducted by General Motors as part of side crash test verification.

Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis/leg
Driver head protection
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis/leg
Rear passenger head protection
Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test ID VTS1908
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm) -19.5
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.

Driver injury measures

Test ID VTS1908
Head HIC-15 152
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.0
Compression (kN) 0.3
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm) 26
Lateral force (kN) 1.4
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm) 31
Average deflection (mm) 30
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) 3.25
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) 0.47
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN) 1.2
Acetabulum force (kN) 1.0
Combined force (kN) 2.0
Left femur
L-M force (kN) 1.2
L-M moment (Nm) 16
A-P moment (Nm) 176

Passenger injury measures

Test ID VTS1908
Head HIC-15 197
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.2
Compression (kN) 0.6
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm) 31
Lateral force (kN) 1.7
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm) 39
Average deflection (mm) 25
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) 3.96
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) 0.51
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN) 0.2
Acetabulum force (kN) 1.5
Combined force (kN) 1.5
Left femur
L-M force (kN) 0.4
L-M moment (Nm) 28
A-P moment (Nm) 55

How the side crash test is conducted

Roof strength

Rating applies to 2019-22 models

Tested vehicle: 2020 Chevrolet Blazer RS 4-door 4wd

Overall evaluation
Curb weight 4,300 lbs
Peak force 20,696 lbs
Strength-to-weight ratio 4.81

How the roof strength test is conducted

Head restraints & seats

Seat type: Power leatherette seat

Overall evaluation
Dynamic rating
Seat/head restraint geometry
Technical measurements for this test
Seat type Power leatherette seat
Geometry
Backset (mm) 16
Distance below top of head (mm) 47
Seat design parameters
Pass/fail Pass
Max T1 acceleration (g) 12.5
Head contact time (ms) 55
Force rating 1
Neck forces
Max neck shear force (N) 39
Max neck tension (N) 549

How the head restraint & seat test is conducted
Currently, IIHS tests apply only to front seats.

Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle

System details

  • Optional Enhanced Automatic Emergency Braking
  • Optional Forward Collision Alert

Package name

  • Optional Driver Confidence II

Overall evaluation

Applies to 2019-22 models

Superior
Superior
with optional equipment
  • This system meets the requirements for forward collision warning.
  • In the 12 mph IIHS test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
  • In the 25 mph IIHS test, this vehicle avoided a collision.

How front crash prevention is evaluated

Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-pedestrian (day)

System details

  • optional Enhanced Automatic Emergency Braking

Overall evaluation

This rating applies to 2019-22 models of the following trim lines: RS trim equipped with Enhanced Convience and DriverConfidence II package, Premier trim equipped with Enhanced Convience and Driver Confidence II package

Advanced
Advanced
with optional equipment

Crossing child

  • In the 12 mph IIHS test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
  • In the 25 mph IIHS test, impact speed was reduced by 18 mph.

Crossing adult

  • In the 12 mph IIHS test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
  • In the 25 mph IIHS test, this vehicle avoided a collision.

Parallel adult

  • In the 25 mph IIHS test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
  • In the 37 mph IIHS test, impact speed was reduced by 17 mph. A warning was issued 2 seconds before impact.

How front crash prevention is evaluated

Headlights

Ratings are given for 2 different headlight variations available on this vehicle.

Trim level(s)

  • Premier trim equipped with Driver Confidence II package
  • RS trim equipped with Driver Confidence II package
Low-beam headlight type HID projector
High-beam headlight type HID projector
Curve-adaptive? No
High-beam assist? Yes
Overall rating
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:
car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler 0 ft 100 ft 200 ft 300 ft 400 ft 500 ft 600 ft Low beams Optimal low-beam illumination High beams Optimal high-beam illumination High-beam assist credit Excessive glare

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was fair in all 4 tests.

The low beams created excessive glare.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was inadequate on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was inadequate in all 4 tests.

High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway and on both left curves.

Technical measurements for this test
Trim level(s)
  • Premier trim equipped with Driver Confidence II package
  • RS trim equipped with Driver Confidence II package
Low-beam headlight type HID projector
High-beam headlight type HID projector
Curve-adaptive? No
High-beam assist? Yes
Overall rating
Applies to 2019-22 models
LOW BEAMS Average minimum useful
illumination distance (5 lux)		 Amount glare
exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge 92.6 m 192.3 %
Straightaway left edge 73.9 m 192.3 %
250m radius right curve, right edge 58.9 m 4.6 %
250m radius left curve, left edge 55.6 m 26.5 %
150m radius right curve, right edge 49.9 m None
150m radius left curve, left edge 46.9 m 13.9 %
HIGH BEAMS Average minimum useful
illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge 97.1 m
Straightaway left edge 91.1 m
250m radius right curve, right edge 58.8 m
250m radius left curve, left edge 58.6 m
150m radius right curve, right edge 49.6 m
150m radius left curve, left edge 48.0 m

Trim level(s)

  • L trim
  • 1LT trim
  • 2LT trim
  • 3LT trim
  • Premier trim
  • RS trim
Low-beam headlight type HID projector
High-beam headlight type HID projector
Curve-adaptive? No
High-beam assist? No
Overall rating
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:
car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler 0 ft 100 ft 200 ft 300 ft 400 ft 500 ft 600 ft Low beams Optimal low-beam illumination High beams Optimal high-beam illumination Excessive glare

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was fair in all 4 tests.

The low beams created excessive glare.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was inadequate on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was inadequate in all 4 tests.

Technical measurements for this test
Trim level(s)
  • L trim
  • 1LT trim
  • 2LT trim
  • 3LT trim
  • Premier trim
  • RS trim
Low-beam headlight type HID projector
High-beam headlight type HID projector
Curve-adaptive? No
High-beam assist? No
Overall rating
Applies to 2019-21 models
LOW BEAMS Average minimum useful
illumination distance (5 lux)		 Amount glare
exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge 92.6 m 192.3 %
Straightaway left edge 73.9 m 192.3 %
250m radius right curve, right edge 58.9 m 4.6 %
250m radius left curve, left edge 55.6 m 26.5 %
150m radius right curve, right edge 49.9 m None
150m radius left curve, left edge 46.9 m 13.9 %
HIGH BEAMS Average minimum useful
illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge 97.1 m
Straightaway left edge 91.1 m
250m radius right curve, right edge 58.8 m
250m radius left curve, left edge 58.6 m
150m radius right curve, right edge 49.6 m
150m radius left curve, left edge 48.0 m

How headlights are evaluated

Child seat anchors

Applies to 2019-22 models

Overall evaluation
Vehicle trim RS
Seat type leather

This vehicle has 2 rear seating positions with complete child seat attachment (LATCH) hardware.

It has 1 additional seating position with a tether anchor only.

Overall evaluation
Vehicle trim RS
Seat type leather
1 2 3
G Good
A Acceptable
M Marginal
P Poor
Seating positions that rely on borrowed lower anchors or have only a tether anchor available are not rated.
thether anchor symbol
 Tether anchor
lower anchor symbol
 Lower anchors
shared lower achors symbol
 Lower anchor(s) can be borrowed from adjacent positions(s)
No hardware available

Details by seating position

1
Tether anchor
easy-to-find location
other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
not too deep in seat
not too much force needed to attach
easy to maneuver around anchors
2
Tether anchor
easy-to-find location
other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
none available
3
Tether anchor
easy-to-find location
other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
not too deep in seat
not too much force needed to attach
easy to maneuver around anchors
Technical measurements for this test

Seat position 21

3

Lower anchor A
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 0-2
Force (lbs) 25
Clearance angle (degrees) 82
Lower anchor B
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 0-2
Force (lbs) 15
Clearance angle (degrees) 84
Tether anchor
Location Middle seatback
Confusing hardware present Yes
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor		 No

Seat position 22

2

Lower anchor A
No lower latch for this seat position
Lower anchor B
No lower latch for this seat position
Tether anchor
Location Middle seatback
Confusing hardware present Yes
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor		 No

Seat position 23

1

Lower anchor A
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 0-2
Force (lbs) 14
Clearance angle (degrees) 87
Lower anchor B
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 0-2
Force (lbs) 13
Clearance angle (degrees) 86
Tether anchor
Location Middle seatback
Confusing hardware present Yes
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor		 No

How child seat anchors are evaluated

End of main content