2024 Mazda 3

Rating overview
Small overlap front
Moderate overlap front: original test
Moderate overlap front: updated test
Side: updated test

Headlights (varies by trim/option)
Front crash prevention: pedestrian
Standard system

Seat belt reminders
LATCH ease of use	+

Small overlap front

The small overlap front evaluation consists of a driver-side and a passenger-side component. If the results of the two evaluations differ, then the combined small overlap rating is equal to the lower rating.

Driver-side

Rating applies to 2019-24 models

Tested vehicle: 2019 Mazda 3 4-door

The Mazda 3 was redesigned for the 2019 model year. Driver-side small overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Mazda as part of frontal crash test verification. These ratings apply to both the sedan and hatchback versions of the Mazda 3.

Driver injury measures
Overall driver-side evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics

Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test ID	VTN1905
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm)	3
Footrest (cm)	5
Left toepan (cm)	1
Brake pedal (cm)	3
Parking brake (cm)
Rocker panel lateral average (cm)	1
Upper occupant compartment
Steering column	0
Upper hinge pillar max (cm)	1
Upper dash (cm)	2
Lower instrument panel (cm)	2

Driver injury measures

Test ID	VTN1905
Head
HIC-15	230
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	1.6
Extension bending moment (Nm)	14
Maximum Nij	0.27
Chest maximum compression (mm)	31
Femur (kN)
Left	0.7
Right	0.3
Knee displacement (mm)
Left	1
Right	1
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left	0
Right	0
Maximum tibia index
Left	0.43
Right	0.64
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left	2.4
Right	1.6
Foot acceleration (g)
Left	64
Right	48

Passenger-side

Rating applies to 2019-24 models

Tested vehicle: 2019 Mazda 3 Preferred 4-door

The Mazda 3 was redesigned for the 2019 model year. Passenger-side small overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Mazda as part of frontal crash test verification. These ratings apply to both the sedan and hatchback versions of the Mazda 3.

Passenger injury measures
Overall passenger-side evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Passenger restraints and dummy kinematics
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics

Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on passenger side

Test ID	VTP1911
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm)	5
Footrest (cm)	5
Right toepan (cm)	3
Center toepan (cm)	3
Rocker panel lateral average (cm)	0
Upper occupant compartment
Center dash (cm)	2
Upper hinge pillar max (cm)	5
Upper dash (cm)	7
Right lower dash (cm)	5

Passenger injury measures

Test ID	VTP1911
Head
HIC-15	172
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	0.5
Extension bending moment (Nm)	13
Maximum Nij	0.16
Chest maximum compression (mm)	19
Femur (kN)
Left	1.3
Right	1.3
Knee displacement (mm)
Left	2
Right	5
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left	0
Right	0
Maximum tibia index
Left	0.41
Right	0.69
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left	3.5
Right	3.4
Foot acceleration (g)
Left	70
Right	71

Driver injury measures

Test ID	VTP1911
Head
HIC-15	94
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	1.1
Extension bending moment (Nm)	10
Maximum Nij	0.20
Chest maximum compression (mm)	29
Femur (kN)
Left	0.3
Right	0.6
Knee displacement (mm)
Left	0
Right	1
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left	0
Right	0
Maximum tibia index
Left	0.38
Right	0.31
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left	0.5
Right	2.2
Foot acceleration (g)
Left	40
Right	54

How the small overlap front test is conducted

Moderate overlap front: original test

Rating applies to 2019-24 models

Tested vehicle: 2019 Mazda 3 4-door

The Mazda 3 was redesigned for the 2019 model year. Moderate overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Mazda as part of frontal crash test verification. These ratings apply to both the sedan and hatchback versions of the Mazda 3.

Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Leg/foot, left
Leg/foot, right
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics

Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test ID	VTF1909
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm)	1
Left (cm)	3
Center (cm)	3
Right (cm)	1
Brake pedal (cm)	3
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm)	0
Right (cm)	1
Steering column movement
Upward (cm)	1
Rearward (cm)	-4
A-pillar rearward movement (cm)	0

Driver injury measures

Test ID	VTF1909
Head
HIC-15	230
Peak gs at hard contact	15
Neck
Tension (kN)	1.6
Extension bending moment (Nm)	14
Maximum Nij	0.27
Chest maximum compression (mm)	31
Legs
Femur force - left (kN)	0.7
Femur force - right (kN)	0.3
Knee displacement - left (mm)	1
Knee displacement - right (mm)	1
Maximum tibia index - left	0.43
Maximum tibia index - right	0.64
Tibia axial force - left (kN)	2.4
Tibia axial force - right (kN)	1.6
Foot acceleration (g)
Left	64
Right	48

How the moderate overlap front test is conducted

Moderate overlap front: updated test

Rating applies to 2024 models

Tested vehicle: 2024 Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.5 S 4-door 4wd

The Mazda 3 was redesigned for the 2019 model year. These ratings apply to the hatchback variant only.

Driver injury measures
Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Head/neck
Chest
Thigh/hip
Leg/foot
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Thigh
Rear passenger restraints and dummy kinematics

View of the vehicle after the crash showing the airbags and damage to the occupant compartment.

The rear passenger dummy's head remained a safe distance from the front seatback.

Rear passenger dummy injury values indicate a low risk of injury to the head or neck and chest. During the crash, the shoulder belt moved too far upward toward the dummy’s neck, compromising the effectiveness of the rear restraint system.

The rear passenger dummy's lap belt remained in the ideal position on the pelvis.

Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test ID	CEF2350
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm)	2
Left (cm)	4
Center (cm)	4
Right (cm)	1
Brake pedal (cm)	3
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm)	-1
Right (cm)	0
Steering column movement
Upward (cm)	0
Rearward (cm)	-5
A-pillar rearward movement (cm)	0

Driver injury measures

Test ID	CEF2350
Head
HIC-15	148
Peak gs at hard contact	negligible
Neck
Tension (kN)	1.1
Extension bending moment (Nm)	9
Maximum Nij	0.20
Chest maximum compression (mm)	28
Femur (kN)
Left	0.6
Right	0.8
Knee displacement (mm)
Left	1
Right	1
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left	0
Right	0
Maximum tibia index
Left	0.29
Right	0.35
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left	1.8
Right	1.8
Foot acceleration (g)
Left	53
Right	34

Rear passenger injury measures

Test ID	CEF2350
Head
HIC-15 for head contact during forward excursion	no contact
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	1.7
Compression (kN)	0.1
Maximum Nij for head contact during forward excursion	no contact
Chest
Chest index	18
Shoulder belt tension (kN)	3.9
Thigh (kN)
Left femur compression	0.1
Right femur compression	0.1

How the updated moderate overlap front test is conducted

February 2024 adjustment to rating criteria

Side: updated test

Rating applies to 2023-24 models

Tested vehicle: 2023 Mazda 3 4-door

The Mazda 3 was redesigned for the 2019 model year. Beginning with 2023 models, improvements were made to the front side airbag and a rear side airbag was added to improve occupant protection in side crashes. Side 2.0 ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2023 Mazda 3 conducted as part of side crash test verification. These ratings apply to both the sedan and hatchback versions of the Mazda 3.

Driver injury measures
Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis
Driver head protection
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis
Rear passenger head protection

Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test ID	VTS2221
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm)	-16.5
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.

Driver injury measures

Test ID	VTS2221
Head
HIC-15	122
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	1.1
Compression (kN)	0.4
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)	38
Lateral force (kN)	1.5
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)	42
Average deflection (mm)	36
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)	8.45
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)	0.92
Pelvis
Combined force (kN)	4.5

Passenger injury measures

Test ID	VTS2221
Head
HIC-15	156
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	0.5
Compression (kN)	0.1
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)	22
Lateral force (kN)	1.2
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)	22
Average deflection (mm)	19
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)	5.90
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)	0.36
Pelvis
Combined force (kN)	1.5

How the side crash test is conducted

Headlights

Ratings are given for 2 different headlight variations available on this vehicle.

Trim level(s)

Premium trim
2.5 Turbo Premium Plus trim

Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:
Low-beam headlight type	LED projector
High-beam headlight type	LED projector
Curve-adaptive?	Yes
High-beam assist?	Yes
Overall rating

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was fair on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good on both right curves, fair on the sharp left curve and inadequate on the gradual left curve.

The low beams never exceeded glare limits.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good on both right curves and fair on both left curves.

High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway and on both left curves.

Technical measurements for this test

Trim level(s)	Premium trim 2.5 Turbo Premium Plus trim
Low-beam headlight type	LED projector
High-beam headlight type	LED projector
Curve-adaptive?	Yes
High-beam assist?	Yes
Overall rating Applies to 2020-24 models

LOW BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)	Amount glare exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge	90.5 m	None
Straightaway left edge	49.2 m	None
250m radius right curve, right edge	88.5 m	None
250m radius left curve, left edge	45.8 m	None
150m radius right curve, right edge	79.6 m	None
150m radius left curve, left edge	46.3 m	None

HIGH BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge	147.6 m
Straightaway left edge	169.4 m
250m radius right curve, right edge	92.0 m
250m radius left curve, left edge	71.5 m
150m radius right curve, right edge	80.9 m
150m radius left curve, left edge	65.0 m

Trim level(s)

Select Sport trim
Preferred trim
Carbon Edition trim
Carbon Turbo trim

Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:
Low-beam headlight type	LED projector
High-beam headlight type	LED projector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	Yes
Overall rating

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and fair on the left side. On curves, visibility was good on both right curves, fair on the sharp left curve and inadequate on the gradual left curve.

The low beams never exceeded glare limits.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the left side of the road and fair on the right side. On curves, visibility was fair on both right curves and inadequate on both left curves.

High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway and on both left curves.

Technical measurements for this test

Trim level(s)	Select Sport trim Preferred trim Carbon Edition trim Carbon Turbo trim
Low-beam headlight type	LED projector
High-beam headlight type	LED projector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	Yes
Overall rating Applies to 2019-24 models

LOW BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)	Amount glare exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge	102.7 m	None
Straightaway left edge	52.6 m	None
250m radius right curve, right edge	71.9 m	None
250m radius left curve, right edge	44.5 m	None
150m radius right curve, right edge	56.7 m	None
150m radius left curve, right edge	47.6 m	None

HIGH BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge	131.7 m
Straightaway left edge	145.1 m
250m radius right curve, right edge	72.8 m
250m radius left curve, left edge	51.7 m
150m radius right curve, right edge	55.7 m
150m radius left curve, left edge	47.9 m

How headlights are evaluated

Front crash prevention: pedestrian

Rating applies to all 2024 models

System details

standard Smart Brake Support

Overall evaluation
Includes high-beam assist credit

Crossing child — day

In the 12 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.

Crossing adult — night

In the 12 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams. When using its low beams, this vehicle avoided a collision.
In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams. When using its low beams, this vehicle avoided a collision.

Parallel adult — night

In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams. When using its low beams, this vehicle avoided a collision.
In the 37 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams and a warning was issued 2.4 seconds before impact. When using its low beams, this vehicle avoided a collision and a warning was issued 1.7 seconds before impact.

How front crash prevention is evaluated

Seat belt reminders

Rating applies to 2024 models

Overall evaluation
Front row
Unbelted occupant alert (audible & visual)
Initiation time
Duration	Long enough (90+ seconds)
Volume
Audio frequency
Second row
Startup status alert (visual)
Initiation time
Duration at least 60 seconds
Belt disengaged alert (audible & visual)
Initiation time
Duration at least 30 seconds
Volume
Audio frequency

Technical measurements for this test

Background cabin sound pressure level at 24 km/h	54 dB
Audible signal sound pressure level at 24 km/h	69 dB
Difference between background and signal	15.1 dB
Background cabin sound pressure level at 40 km/h	55 dB
Audible signal sound pressure level at 40 km/h	70 dB
Difference between background and signal	15.0 dB
Dominant audio frequency	552 Hz

How seat belt reminders are evaluated

Child seat anchors

Rating applies to 2019-24 models

Overall evaluation	+ extra LATCH positions
Vehicle trim	Select
Seat type	leatherette

This vehicle has 2 rear seating positions with complete child seat attachment (LATCH) hardware.

It has 1 additional seating position with a tether anchor and the ability to borrow lower anchors from the other seating positions.

Note: When anchors are borrowed, they aren't available to use in their designated positions.

Overall evaluation	+ extra LATCH positions
Vehicle trim	Select
Seat type	leatherette

G	Good
A	Acceptable
M	Marginal
P	Poor
	Seating positions that rely on borrowed lower anchors or have only a tether anchor available are not rated.
thether anchor symbol	Tether anchor
lower anchor symbol	Lower anchors
shared lower achors symbol	Lower anchor(s) can be borrowed from adjacent positions(s)
	No hardware available

Details by seating position

1
1	Tether anchor
	easy-to-find location
	no other hardware could be confused for anchor
	Lower anchors
	not too deep in seat
	not too much force needed to attach
	easy to maneuver around anchors
2
2	Tether anchor
	easy-to-find location
	no other hardware could be confused for anchor
	Lower anchors
	Can be borrowed from 1 and 3
3
3	Tether anchor
	easy-to-find location
	no other hardware could be confused for anchor
	Lower anchors
	not too deep in seat
	not too much force needed to attach
	easy to maneuver around anchors

Technical measurements for this test

Seat position 21

3

Lower anchor A
Open access rated	Yes
Depth	Visible
Force (lbs)	0
Clearance angle (degrees)	72
Lower anchor B
Open access rated	Yes
Depth	Visible
Force (lbs)	0
Clearance angle (degrees)	72
Tether anchor
Location	Middle seatback
Confusing hardware present	No
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor	No

Seat position 22

2

Lower anchor A
Lower latch is shared for this seat position
Lower anchor B
Lower latch is shared for this seat position
Tether anchor
Location	Middle seatback
Confusing hardware present	No
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor	No

Seat position 23

1

Lower anchor A
Open access rated	Yes
Depth	Visible
Force (lbs)	0
Clearance angle (degrees)	71
Lower anchor B
Open access rated	Yes
Depth	Visible
Force (lbs)	0
Clearance angle (degrees)	75
Tether anchor
Location	Middle seatback
Confusing hardware present	No
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor	No

How child seat anchors are evaluated

2024 Mazda 3

small car / 4-door hatchback

Crashworthiness

Crash avoidance & mitigation

Seat belts & child restraints

Other available safety features

Small overlap front

Driver-side

Passenger-side

Moderate overlap front: original test

Moderate overlap front: updated test

Side: updated test

Headlights

Trim level(s)

Trim level(s)

Front crash prevention: pedestrian

Seat belt reminders

Child seat anchors