Home » Status Report
Status Report, Vol. 41, No. 2 | February 25, 2006 Subscribe

Buckle-up rate lags at night, but study shows enforcement helps

Belt use on U.S. roads climbed to 82 percent in 2005, the second straight year the national rate has topped 80 percent. In fact, belt use has been trending upward for years, and much of the increase has resulted from stepped-up publicity and enforcement of safety belt laws (see "Washington state sets example for belt use," Jan. 11, 2003).

But the trend doesn't reflect the actual use rate around the clock. Rates are tracked by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which surveys belt use from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. — and use is known to be lower at night than during the day.

Fatal crash risk also is much higher per mile driven at night. Connecticut provides a good example. About 40 percent of all fatal passenger vehicle crashes in 2003 occurred at night. Yet only 10 percent of all driving on Connecticut roads occurred between 9 p.m. and 4 a.m.

"Is the higher death rate at night due in part to lower belt use? Or do unbelted drivers take more risks and get into more serious crashes? Research suggests that both are the case, which is why it's so important to pay attention to belt use at night as well as during the day," says Susan Ferguson, Institute senior vice president for research.

Studies in Connecticut and Pennsylvania

Two new studies from the Preusser Research Group, one conducted in Connecticut and the other in Pennsylvania, confirm the differences in belt use rates by time of day. The Connecticut study found nighttime use was 6 percentage points lower than the daytime rate, 77 versus 83 percent. This finding is based on observations of belt use at 100 sites during 2004. The researchers followed nearly identical procedures for the day and night observations, except that they used night vision goggles and hand-held infrared spotlights to collect the data between 9 p.m. and 4 a.m.

The researchers went a step further in Pennsylvania, working with police in Reading to step up enforcement of the safety belt law during nighttime hours. Numerous programs have used publicity and enforcement of such laws to boost daytime buckle-up rates. North Carolina set the example with "Click It or Ticket" (see "'Click it or ticket' expands beyond North Carolina," Nov. 15, 2001), but Reading's program is one of the first to target unbelted motorists at night.

Officers in Reading used various enforcement methods including checkpoints, where night vision equipment helped the police observe belt use and ticket unbelted motorists. Radio and newspaper coverage plus other publicity warned of this enforcement program, which ran during September 2004.

A complication involved the Pennsylvania belt law itself, which allows for enforcement only if a driver is stopped first for another violation. Still, Reading police issued 42 tickets for not buckling up during the program plus another 225 warnings.

Belt use generally is lower in Reading than the United States at large, but the city's enforcement program made a difference. Belt use during the day went from 56 percent before the program to 59 percent after, while the nighttime rate increased from 50 to 56 percent. Meanwhile, enforcement wasn't beefed up in Bethlehem, Pa., where use rates didn't change.

Challenge of nighttime enforcement

Observing whether motorists are using their belts at night is difficult except where there's bright overhead lighting. Police in Reading used near-military grade night vision goggles to overcome this problem, but using such equipment to enforce traffic laws has sparked some controversy.

Last summer complaints about police spying on motorists in Maryland cut short the use of goggles to monitor belt use rates at night. Governor Robert Ehrlich ordered discontinuation of the goggles after only a three-hour test.

"Still, it's important to find ways to boost belt use at night, and one way is to combine enforcement of belt laws with nighttime enforcement of DWI laws," Ferguson says. For example, Institute researchers worked with police in Binghamton, N.Y., to conduct safety belt and DWI checkpoints. The result was a reduction in the proportion of drinking drivers and an increase in the belt use rate, especially the nighttime rate (see "Belt use rises, drinking declines in checkpoint program," Oct. 19, 1991).

Two more states get primary belt laws

One reason the belt use rate in Pennsylvania is low is that it allows only for secondary enforcement. Alaska and Mississippi are the latest states to upgrade to primary belt laws.

©1996-2018, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Highway Loss Data Institute | www.iihs.org