Rear crash protection: Suzuki

For each seat/head restraint, rear-end crash protection is an assessment of occupant protection against neck injury in rear impacts at low to moderate speeds. Although such injuries usually aren't serious, they occur frequently.

The overall ratings are based on a two-step evaluation. In the first step the geometry (distance behind and below the head of a seated average-size man) is rated good, acceptable, marginal, or poor. Seats with good or acceptable geometry then are subjected to a dynamic test simulating the forces in a stationary vehicle that's rear-ended by another vehicle of the same weight going 20 mph. Seat/head restraints with marginal or poor geometry aren't tested dynamically because they cannot protect taller people in rear-end crashes. These seats are rated poor overall.

In the dynamic tests measurements are recorded on a dummy (BioRID) representing an average-size man. BioRID is designed specifically for rear-end testing at low to moderate speeds. The dynamic ratings are derived from two seat design parameters (acceleration of the dummy's torso and time from impact initiation to head restraint contact with the dummy's head) plus tension and shear forces recorded on the dummy's neck. Overall ratings are based on both geometric measurements and dynamic results.

More about the procedures for rating seat/head restraints

Good Acceptable Marginal Poor

Model	Seat type	Dynamic rating
Aerio 2002-2007	All seats
Equator 2010-2013	Manual cloth seats (AHR)
Equator 2009	Seats with adjustable lumbar (AHR)
Equator 2009	Seats without adjustable lumbar (AHR)
Forenza 2005-2008	All seats	not tested (see note)
Forenza 2004	All seats
Grand Vitara 2006-2013	All seats
Grand Vitara 2003-2005	All seats
Grand Vitara XL-7 2005-2006	All seats	not tested (see note)
Kizashi 2010-2013	Power cloth seats
Reno 2005-2008	All seats	not tested (see note)
SX4 2007-2013	Manual cloth seats
Verona 2005-2006	All seats
Verona 2004	All seats
XL7 2007-2009	Manual-power leather seats

Note: Seat/head restraints with marginal or poor geometry aren't tested dynamically because they cannot protect taller people in rear-end crashes. These seats are rated poor overall. Seat/head restraints with good or acceptable geometry are also tested dynamically.

Rear crash protection test details (technical information)

Geometric ratings of other Suzuki models

Ratings of seat/head restraints in newer model cars are based on restraint geometry and a dynamic test. The Institute has been publishing model-by-model ratings of the the geometry of the head restraints in older models since the mid-1990s. Geometry is the necessary first step toward a seat/head restraint that provides effective protection in rear-end crashes at low to moderate speeds.

More than one rating: Ratings are for individual vehicle models. More than one rating may be shown for a model because vehicle seat options can affect head restraint geometry.

No rating shown/no model year listed: The Institute has not evaluated the head restraints in every vehicle model during every model year. If a rating box is blank or if a model year is not listed, no rating is available. If a box is shaded gray, the model was not manufactured that year.

AHR: active head restraint. These are designed to move closer to the backs of occupants' heads in rear-end crashes. These are not rated for geometry at this time.

Model		2004	2003	2002
Aerio		see table above	see table above	see table above
Esteem
Forenza		see table above
Verona		see table above
Grand Vitara 4-dr
Grand Vitara XL-7
Sidekick	2-dr
Sidekick	4-dr
Swift
X90

back to make/model list