Bumper mismatch is still a problem when SUVs and cars collide in everyday fender-benders. Bumpers on cars are designed to match up with each other in collisions, but a long-standing gap in federal regulations exempts SUVs from the same rules. New Institute crash tests demonstrate the results: SUV bumpers that don't line up with those on cars can lead to huge repair bills in what should be minor collisions in stop-and-go traffic. That's not to mention the hassle of needing a tow and waiting on the body shop.
"SUVs and cars share the road," says Joe Nolan, the Institute's chief administrative officer. "The problem is they don't share the same bumper rules, and consumers end up paying the price."
A federal standard requires that all cars have bumpers that protect within a zone of 16 to 20 inches from the ground. This means car bumpers line up reasonably well and are more likely to engage during low-speed collisions to absorb energy and prevent damage. No bumper requirements apply to SUVs, pickups, or minivans, so when these vehicles have bumpers they often are flimsier and higher off the ground than bumpers on cars. Plus, SUVs and pickups may not have bumpers at all.
In fender-benders with SUVs, cars often end up with excessive damage to hoods, engine cooling systems, fenders, bumper covers, and safety equipment like lights. SUVs don't always come out unscathed either, often needing extensive work.
The Institute first demonstrated this mismatch in 2004 in a series of SUV-car crash tests at 10 mph (see "Huge cost of bumper mismatch," Sept. 13, 2004, and "Bumper rules should extend to light trucks, Institute tells NHTSA," July 1, 2008). The latest tests involved 7 pairs of 2010-11 models, each composed of a small car and small SUV from the same automaker.
"We picked vehicles from the same manufacturer because we think automakers should at the least pay attention to bumper compatibility across their own fleets," Nolan explains. "The results show that many don't."
In the tests, an SUV going 10 mph struck the back of its paired car, which was stopped. Then the configuration was reversed, with the car striking the back of its paired SUV. Results of these low-speed impacts varied widely, from a total of $850 damage to one vehicle to $6,015 damage to another. In some cases, the crash damage included major leaks from broken radiators and cooling fans. If these collisions had happened in the real world, the motorists wouldn't have been able to drive away. If they did, their vehicles could overheat, and the engines could be ruined.
Pricey repairs when bumpers don't line up
Nissan Sentra and Nissan Rogue: The plastic covers on bumper systems obscure the mismatch problem by hiding the positions of bumper bars, which are the main energy-absorbing components. With the covers removed, it's obvious the bars on many SUVs and cars don't match up. When the Nissan Rogue struck the back of the Sentra in the 10 mph front-into-rear crash test, the Rogue's bumper overrode the Sentra's, and the result was that $7,444 in repairs were needed for the pair. Radiator damage made the Rogue undriveable afterward.
Ford Focus and Ford Escape: The bars on the Ford Escape and Focus overlapped less than 2 inches, not enough to spare the Focus $3,386 in rear damage. Crash energy was concentrated above the Focus bumper and crushed its rear body and trunk lid. Better-aligned bumpers could prevent damage like this.
High cost of bumper mismatch
If bumpers don't match up, they'll bypass each other when vehicles collide, and the resulting crash energy will crumple the vehicle body. That's what happened when the Nissan Rogue struck the back of the Nissan Sentra in the SUV-into-car test. The Rogue's front bumper didn't line up at all with the Sentra's rear bumper, and the resulting $4,560 rear damage tally for the Sentra was the highest among all the cars in this test. The impact crumpled the car's bumper cover, trunk lid, and rear body. The Rogue ended up with a crushed and leaking radiator that kept the SUV from being driven after the test.
Bumper height mismatch contributed to pricey damage when the Ford Escape struck the rear of the Ford Focus. Their bumpers overlapped less than 2 inches, not enough to protect the Focus's rear body and trunk lid from $3,386 in repairs.
The mismatch problem with the Ford pair was even worse when the Focus struck the back of the Escape. The front bumper on the car underrode the high-riding Escape's rear bumper, which at 25 inches off the ground is the tallest among all the small SUVs evaluated this time around. Damage to the Focus came to $5,203 and included replacing most of the sheet metal plus many parts in front of the engine.
When the Toyota Corolla hit the rear of the Toyota RAV4 in the car-into-SUV test, damage amounted to nearly $10,000 for the pair — the highest combined test damage among all of the vehicle pairs the Institute evaluated. The RAV4 accounted for about $6,000 of the bill.
"The RAV4's so-called bumper is really just a stamped piece of sheet metal supporting the bumper cover," Nolan explains. "So instead of engaging a strong bumper, the striking Corolla hit the spare tire mounted on the RAV4's tailgate. The spare isn't designed to absorb crash energy, so it damaged the Corolla's hood, grille, headlights, air conditioner, and radiator support and crushed the RAV4's tailgate and rear body panels."
Mismatch is a problem when cars hit SUVs, too
Ford Escape and Ford Focus: The Focus's front bumper slid under the high-riding Escape in the car-into-SUV test, adding up to $5,203 damage for the car and $2,208 for the SUV. The Focus needed a new hood, bumper bar and cover, headlights, air-conditioning condenser, and fenders.
Toyota RAV4 and Toyota Corolla: Bumpers on the Toyota Corolla and RAV4 overlapped less than an inch, so they bypassed each other when the car struck the back of the SUV. The RAV4's rear-mounted spare tire crushed the Corolla's hood, grille, headlights, and air conditioner. Damage to the pair totaled $9,867 — $6,015 for the RAV4 alone. The RAV4 bumper is just a thin piece of sheet metal. It doesn't extend enough to engage with the Corolla or protect the SUV's tailgate and spare tire.
Bumpers on Honda's CR-V and Civic were the most compatible in the test in which an SUV strikes the rear of a car, and at $2,995 the pair had the lowest combined estimated damage in this crash test. The Civic's $1,274 damage was the lowest among the cars. The CR-V is one of only 3 SUVs whose front bumpers overlapped half of the rear bumpers on the cars they hit.
"The CR-V's front bumper overlapped the Civic's rear bumper by more than 2 inches. That may not sound like much, but it's enough to allow the bumpers to do what they're supposed to do," Nolan says.
When the Kia Forte struck the back of the Hyundai Tucson, their bumpers matched up well enough to keep the Forte from underriding the SUV, limiting damage to a combined $3,601 for both vehicles. The Forte's $1,510 repair estimate was the lowest among cars in the car-into-SUV test.
The Tucson-Forte pair's bumpers also did a good job of lining up in the SUV-into-car test. The Tucson's $850 damage estimate was better than the other SUVs, and it was the only SUV that didn't have a damaged air-conditioning condenser.
Matching bumpers help limit damage
Honda Civic and Honda CR-V: The bumper bars on this pair of Hondas lined up. This is the main reason these vehicles sustained less damage in the SUV-into-car test than the 6 other pairs. The Civic's $1,274 in estimated rear damage when hit by the CR-V was the lowest among cars in this test. The vehicles' bumpers overlapped by more than 2 inches, enough so the bumpers engaged, and the energy-absorbing system did its job.
Hyundai Tucson and Kia Forte: The Kia Forte's front bumper lined up with the rear bumper of the Hyundai Tucson in the car-into-SUV test, keeping the front of the Forte from underriding the SUV and limiting damage to a combined $3,601 for both vehicles. The Tucson needed $2,091 in repairs, while damage to the Forte totaled $1,510 — the least expensive repair bill for front damage among all the cars tested.
Despite bumpers that aligned, results for the Forte weren't as good. The Forte had more than $3,000 rear damage because its bumper broke during impact. The car's rear body panel also was damaged. "This is a good example of why bumpers not only need to match up, they also need to be strong," Nolan points out.
When the Dodge Caliber struck the rear of the Jeep Patriot (both Chrysler products), their bumpers had less than half an inch of overlap. Normally this would mean the car's bumper would slide under the SUV. That didn't happen in this case because the Caliber has vertical extenders on both frame rails that prevented underride. The Caliber was the only car without hood damage.
"Repair costs are influenced by many factors," Nolan says. "In the Caliber's case, tall frame rails helped compensate for minimal bumper overlap."
Damage repair costs in 10 mph front-into-rear crash tests
|SUV damage||Car damage||Total damage|
|SUV into car|
|Honda CR-V into Honda Civic||$1,721||$1,274||$2,995|
|Toyota RAV4 into Toyota Corolla||$1,434||$2,327||$3,761|
|Hyundai Tucson into Kia Forte||$850||$3,223||$4,073|
|Volkswagen Tiguan into Volkswagen Golf||$2,329||$2,058||$4,387|
|Jeep Patriot into Dodge Caliber||$1,415||$3,095||$4,510|
|Ford Escape into Ford Focus||$1,470||$3,386||$4,856|
|Nissan Rogue into Nissan Sentra||$2,884||$4,560||$7,444|
|Car into SUV|
|Kia Forte into Hyundai Tucson||$1,510||$2,091||$3,601|
|Dodge Caliber into Jeep Patriot||$2,559||$1,338||$3,897|
|Honda Civic into Honda CR-V||$4,921||$1,053||$5,974|
|Volkswagen Golf into Volkswagen Tiguan||$4,555||$1,872||$6,427|
|Nissan Sentra into Nissan Rogue||$5,114||$1,428||$6,542|
|Ford Focus into Ford Escape||$5,203||$2,208||$7,411|
|Toyota Corolla into Toyota RAV4||$3,852||$6,015||$9,867|
|Note: The Ford Escape and Focus, Hyundai Tucson, and Volkswagen Golf and Tiguan are 2011 models. All other cars and SUVs are 2010s. Repair costs reflect November 2010 parts and labor prices.|
Regulate SUV bumpers
The Institute in July 2008 petitioned the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to regulate bumpers on SUVs and pickups, the same as cars, and require them to match up in a way that shields both vehicles from costly damage. The agency in June 2009 agreed to seek comments on the petition but hasn't moved forward with a rulemaking or a low-speed compliance test for bumpers.
Regulators have long said that requiring light trucks to have bumpers would compromise off-road maneuverability and make it hard to use these kinds of vehicles at loading ramps. The Institute counters that very few SUVs and pickups are used off road. In addition, bumpers aren't the limiting factor in most vehicles' approach and departure angles. Instead air dams, bumper covers, exhaust pipes, and other trim mounted lower than the bumpers get in the way.
"Of the 7 car-SUV pairs we tested, we can't point to a single one as a model of compatibility because combined damage estimates run into thousands of dollars for even the best performers," Nolan says. "In the real world that money comes straight out of consumers' wallets through deductibles and insurance premiums. Regulating SUV bumpers would ease the burden."