Home » Ratings

2015 Toyota Sienna

Minivan
Crashworthiness
  • Small overlap front
    A
  • Moderate overlap front
    G
  • Side
    G
  • Roof strength
    G
  • Head restraints & seats
    G

Front crash prevention
Crash avoidance rating
Advanced
with optional
equipment

Check for NHTSA recalls


Child Seat Anchors (LATCH)
ease of use
P
1
Side airbags: head curtain airbags for all three rows of seats and front seat-mounted torso airbags
2
Rollover sensor: designed to deploy the side curtain airbags in the event of an impending rollover (beginning with 2015 models)
3
Driver knee airbag: a separate airbag in the lower instrument panel designed to minimize knee injuries in frontal crashes
4
Seat cushion airbag: a separate airbag in the forward portion of the front passenger seat cushion to prevent occupants from sliding under the seat belt (beginning with 2015 models)
5
Electronic stability control
6
Antilock brakes
7
Daytime running lights
Model year Front overlap SideRoof strengthHead restraints & seatsFront crash prevention
SmallModerate
2015
A
G
G
G
G
Crash avoidance rating
Advanced
2014
G
G
G
G
Crash avoidance rating
FCW Not Qualified
autobrake
not tested
2013
G
G
G
G
Crash avoidance rating
FCW Not Qualified
autobrake
not tested
2012
G
G
G
G
Crash avoidance rating
2011
G
G
G
G
Crash avoidance rating
2010
G
G
P
Crash avoidance rating
2009
G
G
P
Crash avoidance rating
2008
G
G
P
Crash avoidance rating
2007
G
G
P
Crash avoidance rating
2006
G
G
P
Crash avoidance rating
2005
G
G
A
P
Crash avoidance rating
2004
G
Crash avoidance rating
2003
G
Crash avoidance rating
2002
G
Crash avoidance rating
2001
G
Crash avoidance rating
2000
G
Crash avoidance rating
1999
G
Crash avoidance rating
1998
G
Crash avoidance rating

Applies to 2015 models

Overall evaluation
A
Structure and safety cage
M
Injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Hip/thigh
G
Lower leg/foot
G
Restraints and dummy kinematics
A
Important: Frontal crash test ratings should be compared only among vehicles of similar weight.

The Toyota Sienna was redesigned for the 2011 model year. Beginning with 2015 models, the front end structure was modified to improve occupant protection in small overlap frontal crashes.

Structure

The driver space was not maintained well, with maximum intrusion of the upper interior of 13-14 cm at the upper hinge pillar and instrument panel. Lower interior intrusion measured 12 cm at the parking brake pedal and 11 cm at the hinge pillar.

Injury measures

Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Restraints and dummy kinematics

The dummy’s head barely contacted the frontal airbag before sliding off the left side, leaving the head vulnerable to contact with forward structure. Additionally, the seat belt allowed excessive forward excursion of the dummy’s head and torso. The side curtain airbag deployed and had sufficient forward coverage to protect the head from contact with side structure and outside objects. The side torso airbag also deployed.

Tested vehicle specifications

Tested vehicle2015 Toyota Sienna LE
Weight 4,448 lbs.
Side airbagshead curtain airbags for all three rows of seats and front seat-mounted torso airbags
Wheelbase119 in.
Length200 in.
Width78 in.
Engine3.5 L V6
EPA ratings18 mpg city / 25 mpg highway

How this test is conducted

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test IDCEN1439
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm)11
Footrest (cm)9
Left toepan (cm)6
Brake pedal (cm)7
Parking brake (cm)12
Rocker panel lateral average (cm)4
Upper occupant compartment
Steering column5
Upper hinge pillar max (cm)14
Upper dash (cm)13
Lower instrument panel (cm)10

Driver injury measures

Test IDCEN1439
Head
HIC-15119
Peak gs at hard contactno contact
Neck
Tension (kN)1.4
Extension bending moment (Nm)6
Maximum Nij 0.23
Chest maximum compression (mm)24
Femur (kN)
Left4.3
Right0.9
Knee displacement (mm)
Left7
Right1
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left2
Right0
Maximum tibia index
Left0.54
Right0.34
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left1.1
Right2.4
Foot acceleration (g)
Left44
Right85

Applies to 2011-15 models

Overall evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
G
Injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Leg/foot, left
G
Leg/foot, right
G
Restraints and dummy kinematics
G
Important: Frontal crash test ratings should be compared only among vehicles of similar weight.

The Toyota Sienna was redesigned for the 2011 model year. Frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Toyota as part of frontal crash test verification.

Injury measures

Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Restraints and dummy kinematics

Dummy movement was well controlled. The side curtain airbags on both sides of the vehicle deployed during the crash. After the dummy moved forward into the frontal airbag, its head contacted the driver side curtain airbag.

Tested vehicle specifications

Tested vehicle2011 Toyota Sienna LE
Weight 4,342 lbs.
Side airbagshead curtain airbags for all three rows of seats and front seat-mounted torso airbags
Wheelbase119 in.
Length200 in.
Width78 in.
Engine3.5 L V6
EPA ratings18 mpg city / 24 mpg highway

How this test is conducted

Measures of occcupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test IDVTF0906
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm)8
Left (cm)12
Center (cm)7
Right (cm)8
Brake pedal (cm)5
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm)-3
Right (cm)-3
Steering column movement
Upward (cm)0
Rearward (cm)1
A-pillar rearward movement (cm)2

Driver injury measures

Test IDVTF0906
Head
HIC-15209
Peak gs at hard contactno contact
Neck
Tension (kN)1.5
Extension bending moment (Nm)22
Maximum Nij 0.23
Chest maximum compression (mm)31
Legs
Femur force - left (kN)0.7
Femur force - right (kN)1.4
Knee displacement - left (mm)1
Knee displacement - right (mm)1
Maximum tibia index - left0.39
Maximum tibia index - right0.32
Tibia axial force - left (kN)2.2
Tibia axial force - right (kN)2.8
Foot acceleration (g)
Left70
Right90

Applies to 2014-15 models

Overall evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
G
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
G
Torso
G
Pelvis/leg
G
Head protection
G
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
G
Torso
G
Pelvis/leg
G
Head protection
G
Side crash test ratings can be compared across vehicle categories.

The Toyota Sienna was redesigned for the 2011 model year. Beginning with 2014 models, the side torso airbags were modified to improve the protection of drivers and front seat passengers in side impact crashes. Side ratings are assigned by the Institute based on tests conducted by Toyota as part of side crash test verification.

Two tests of the Sienna were conducted, one of a 2011 model and the other representing a 2014 model. These vehicles are rated separately, except that the structure ratings for both vehicles are based on both tests, as are rear passenger dummy injury and head protection ratings, because no changes were made affecting structure or rear seat occupants. (The vehicle tested by Toyota was designated as a 2011 model but included the side torso airbag changes of the 2014 models.)

Injury measures

Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Passenger — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Head protection

Driver — The dummy’s head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof.

Passenger — The dummy’s head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof.

Tested vehicle specifications

Tested vehicle2011 Toyota Sienna LE
Weight 4,342 lbs.
Side airbagsstandard head curtain airbags for all three rows of seats and standard front seat-mounted torso airbags
Wheelbase119 in.
Length200 in.
Width78 in.
Engine3.5 L V6
EPA ratings18 mpg city / 24 mpg highway

How this test is conducted

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test IDVTS0909VTS1235
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm)
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.
-15.5-14.0

Driver injury measures

Test IDVTS1235
Head HIC-15235
Neck
Tension (kN)0.9
Compression (kN)0.1
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)32
Lateral force (kN)1.0
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)22
Average deflection (mm)21
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)2.77
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)0.14
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN)1.0
Acetabulum force (kN)1.4
Combined force (kN)2.0
Left femur
L-M force (kN)0.6
L-M moment (Nm)29
A-P moment (Nm) 109

Passenger injury measures

Test IDVTS0909VTS1235
Head HIC-15202156
Neck
Tension (kN)0.40.2
Compression (kN)0.00.1
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)4142
Lateral force (kN)1.41.1
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)2731
Average deflection (mm)1714
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)2.462.61
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)0.330.39
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN)1.71.0
Acetabulum force (kN)2.22.5
Combined force (kN)3.63.4
Left femur
L-M force (kN)0.20.3
L-M moment (Nm)3150
A-P moment (Nm) 6761

Applies to 2011-15 models

Overall evaluation
G
Curb weight4,354 lbs
Peak force17,950 lbs
Strength-to-weight ratio4.12
Tested vehicle
2011 Toyota Sienna LE
Roof strength test ratings can be compared across vehicle categories.

In the test, the strength of the roof is determined by pushing a metal plate against one side of it at a slow but constant speed. The force applied relative to the vehicle's weight is known as the strength-to-weight ratio. This graph shows how the ratio varied as the test of this vehicle progressed. The peak strength-to-weight ratio recorded at any time before the roof is crushed 5 inches is the key measurement of roof strength.

A good rating requires a strength-to-weight ratio of at least 4. In other words, the roof must withstand a force of at least 4 times the vehicle's weight before the plate crushes the roof by 5 inches. For an acceptable rating, the minimum required strength-to-weight ratio is 3.25. For a marginal rating, it is 2.5. Anything lower than that is poor.

How this test is conducted

Applies to 2011-15 models

Overall evaluation
G
Dynamic rating
G
Seat/head restraint geometry
G
Important: Ratings for head restraints & seats should be compared only among vehicles of similar weight.

Seat type

Power cloth seat AHR

How this test is conducted

Seat typePower cloth seat AHR
Geometry
Backset (mm)55
Distance below top of head (mm)28
Seat design parameters
Pass/failPass
Max T1 acceleration (g)10.4
Head contact time (ms)66
Force rating1
Neck forces
Max neck shear force (N)31
Max neck tension (N)540

Applies to 2015 models

System details

  • Optional Pre-Collision System

Package name

  • Optional Limited Advanced Technology Package

Overall evaluation

Crash avoidance rating
Advanced
with optional
equipment
3 points total

Forward collision warning

This system meets the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's criteria for forward collision warning.
1 point

Low-speed autobrake

In the 12 mph IIHS test, impact speed was reduced by 9 mph.
1 point

High-speed autobrake

In the 25 mph IIHS test, impact speed was reduced by 7 mph.
1 point

How this rating is determined

Applies to 2015 models

How this rating is determined

Overall evaluation

P
Vehicle trimLE
Seat type cloth

This vehicle has 4 rear seating positions with complete child seat attachment (LATCH) hardware.

123645


Good
Acceptable
Marginal
Poor
Seating positions that rely on borrowed lower anchors or have only a tether anchor available are not rated.
Tether anchor
Lower anchors
Lower anchor(s) can be borrowed from adjacent positions(s)
No hardware available

Details by seating position

1
Tether anchor
hard-to-find location
other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
too deep in seat
not too much force needed to attach
easy to maneuver around anchors
3
Tether anchor
hard-to-find location
other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
too deep in seat
too much force needed to attach
easy to maneuver around anchors
4
Tether anchor
hard-to-find location
other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
not too deep in seat
not too much force needed to attach
easy to maneuver around anchors
5
Tether anchor
hard-to-find location
other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
too deep in seat
not too much force needed to attach
easy to maneuver around anchors

Seat position 21

3
Lower anchor A
Depth (cm)0-2
Force (lbs)36.1
Clearance angle (degrees)73.9
Lower anchor B
Depth (cm)2-4
Force (lbs)41.6
Clearance angle (degrees)70.4
Tether anchor
LocationBottom seatback
Confusing hardware presentYes
Has constrasting label
within 3 inches of tethor anchor
No

Seat position 23

1
Lower anchor A
Depth (cm)2-4
Force (lbs)21.7
Clearance angle (degrees)69.3
Lower anchor B
Depth (cm)2-4
Force (lbs)25.5
Clearance angle (degrees)72.4
Tether anchor
LocationBottom seatback
Confusing hardware presentYes
Has constrasting label
within 3 inches of tethor anchor
No

Seat position 32

5
Lower anchor A
Depth (cm)2-4
Force (lbs)15.3
Clearance angle (degrees)74.2
Lower anchor B
Depth (cm)0-2
Force (lbs)12.5
Clearance angle (degrees)74.5
Tether anchor
LocationBottom seatback
Confusing hardware presentYes
Has constrasting label
within 3 inches of tethor anchor
No

Seat position 33

4
Lower anchor A
Depth (cm)0-2
Force (lbs)15.3
Clearance angle (degrees)56.6
Lower anchor B
Depth (cm)0-2
Force (lbs)25.4
Clearance angle (degrees)73.9
Tether anchor
LocationBottom seatback
Confusing hardware presentYes
Has constrasting label
within 3 inches of tethor anchor
No

©1996-2015, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Highway Loss Data Institute | www.iihs.org