Home » Ratings

2015 Toyota Prius

Small car
2014 Toyota Prius shown
2014 Toyota Prius shown
Crashworthiness
  • Small overlap front
    A
  • Moderate overlap front
    G
  • Side
    G
  • Roof strength
    G
  • Head restraints & seats
    G

Crash avoidance & Mitigation
Front crash prevention
Crash avoidance rating
Advanced
with optional
equipment

Child Seat Anchors (LATCH)
ease of use
M


Ratings shown are the latest available for this model year.
See below for ratings based on manufacture date.

Check for NHTSA recalls

The photos and videos shown here may be of a different model, model year or body type from the one selected. The ratings of one vehicle often apply to other models if they are built on the same platform. In addition, a test of a vehicle from one model year may apply to earlier or later model years if the vehicle hasn't been significantly redesigned.

Model year Front overlap Side Roof strength Head restraints & seats Front crash prevention
Small Moderate
2016
G
G
G
G
G
Crash avoidance rating
Superior
2015
A
G
G
G
G
Crash avoidance rating
Advanced
2014
A
G
G
G
G
Crash avoidance rating
Advanced
2013
G
G
G
G
Crash avoidance rating
Advanced
2012
G
G
G
G
Crash avoidance rating
2011
G
G
G
G
Crash avoidance rating
2010
G
G
G
Crash avoidance rating
2009
G
G
M
Crash avoidance rating
2008
G
G
M
Crash avoidance rating
2007
G
G
M
Crash avoidance rating
2006
G
G
P
M
Crash avoidance rating
2005
G
G
P
M
Crash avoidance rating
2004
G
G
P
M
Crash avoidance rating

Applies to 2014-15 models built after November 2013

Overall evaluation
A
Structure and safety cage
M
Injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Hip/thigh
G
Lower leg/foot
G
Restraints and dummy kinematics
A
Important: Frontal crash test ratings should be compared only among vehicles of similar weight.

The Toyota Prius was redesigned for the 2010 model year. As in earlier models, the Prius is a hybrid with both a gasoline engine and electric motor. A Prius Plug-in model was introduced in the 2012 model year. This variant also uses a gasoline engine and electric motor, but the motor's lithium-ion battery can be charged by connecting it with an electrical cord to a standard household outlet. The Plug-in is designed to operate primarily in electric mode for 11 miles from a full charge. Beyond this range, it operates in the same manner as the standard Prius.

Beginning with 2014 Prius and Prius Plug-in models, the front structure was modified and the side curtain airbags were lengthened to improve occupant protection in small overlap frontal crashes. Then, starting with 2014 cars built after November 2013, the 15-inch alloy wheels standard on most models were sourced from a single supplier to provide a more controlled crush during the small overlap test. (Information about when a specific vehicle was manufactured is on the certification label typically affixed to the car on the driver door or adjacent B-pillar.)

Structure

The driver space was not maintained well, with maximum intrusion of the lower interior of 22 cm at the lower hinge pillar. The parking brake pedal was pushed in toward the driver 19 cm. Upper interior intrusion measured 13-17 cm at the hinge pillar and instrument panel.

Injury measures

Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Restraints and dummy kinematics

The dummy’s head barely contacted the frontal airbag before sliding off the left side, leaving the head vulnerable to contact with forward structure. Additionally, the seat belt allowed excessive forward excursion of the dummy’s head and torso. The side curtain airbag deployed and had sufficient forward coverage to protect the head from contact with side structure and outside objects.

Tested vehicle specifications

Tested vehicle 2014 Toyota Prius Two 4-door
Weight 3,085 lbs.
Side airbags front and rear head curtain airbags and front seat-mounted torso airbags
Wheelbase 106 in.
Length 176 in.
Width 69 in.
Engine 1.8 L 4-cylinder (gasoline) and electric motor
EPA ratings 51 mpg city / 48 mpg highway

How this test is conducted

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test ID CEN1347
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm) 22
Footrest (cm) 7
Left toepan (cm) 2
Brake pedal (cm) 5
Parking brake (cm) 19
Rocker panel lateral average (cm) 1
Upper occupant compartment
Steering column 0
Upper hinge pillar max (cm) 13
Upper dash (cm) 14
Lower instrument panel (cm) 17

Driver injury measures

Test ID CEN1347
Head
HIC-15 170
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.5
Extension bending moment (Nm) 10
Maximum Nij 0.29
Chest maximum compression (mm) 20
Femur (kN)
Left 2.9
Right 0.3
Knee displacement (mm)
Left 7
Right 0
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left 0
Right 0
Maximum tibia index
Left 0.52
Right 0.28
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left 1.7
Right 1.3
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 43
Right 85

Applies to 2010-15 models

Overall evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
G
Injury measures
Head/neck
A
Chest
G
Leg/foot, left
G
Leg/foot, right
G
Restraints and dummy kinematics
G
Important: Frontal crash test ratings should be compared only among vehicles of similar weight.

The Toyota Prius was redesigned for the 2010 model year. As in earlier models, the Prius is a hybrid with both a gasoline engine and electric motor. A Prius Plug-in model was introduced in the 2012 model year. This variant also uses a gasoline engine and electric motor, but the motor's lithium-ion battery can be charged by connecting it with an electrical cord to a standard household outlet. The Plug-in is designed to operate primarily in electric mode for 11 miles from a full charge. Beyond this range, it operates in the same manner as the standard Prius.

Two tests of the Prius were conducted, the first by Toyota of a 2010 Prius as part of frontal crash test verification and the second by the Institute of a 2012 Prius Plug-in. Ratings are based on both tests and apply to both Prius variants. Vehicle specifications are provided for the 2010 Prius from the Toyota test and photos are provided from the Institute's test of the 2012 Prius Plug-in.

Injury measures

In both tests, measures taken from the neck, chest, and both legs indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this severity. Measures of dummy head acceleration in the two tests, taken together, indicate that head injuries would be possible when the head hit the steering wheel through the airbag. Head accelerations from the B-pillar hit in the first test and the roof rail hit in the second test were low.

Restraints and dummy kinematics

Dummy movement was well controlled in both tests. During rebound, the dummy's head hit the B-pillar in the 2010 model and the roof rail in the 2012 model.

Tested vehicle specifications

Tested vehicle 2010 Toyota Prius 4-door
Weight 3,064 lbs.
Side airbags front and rear head curtain airbags and front seat-mounted torso airbags
Wheelbase 106 in.
Length 176 in.
Width 69 in.
Engine 1.8 L 4-cylinder (gasoline) and electric motor
EPA ratings 51 mpg city / 48 mpg highway

How this test is conducted

Measures of occcupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test ID VTF0901 CEF1205
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm) 2 6
Left (cm) 8 9
Center (cm) 12 17
Right (cm) 4 9
Brake pedal (cm) 3 6
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm) 3 4
Right (cm) 3 3
Steering column movement
Upward (cm) -2 -3
Rearward (cm) 3 0
A-pillar rearward movement (cm) 2 2

Driver injury measures

Test ID VTF0901 CEF1205
Head
HIC-15 443 250
Peak gs at hard contact 84 65
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.5 0.9
Extension bending moment (Nm) 16 38
Maximum Nij 0.29 0.35
Chest maximum compression (mm) 29 27
Legs
Femur force - left (kN) 1.5 1.0
Femur force - right (kN) 1.3 1.1
Knee displacement - left (mm) 1 1
Knee displacement - right (mm) 1 0
Maximum tibia index - left 0.47 0.38
Maximum tibia index - right 0.54 0.41
Tibia axial force - left (kN) 2.8 1.8
Tibia axial force - right (kN) 2.7 3.0
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 62 59
Right 53 68

Applies to 2010-15 models

Overall evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
A
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
G
Torso
G
Pelvis/leg
G
Head protection
G
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
G
Torso
G
Pelvis/leg
G
Head protection
G
Side crash test ratings can be compared across vehicle categories.

The Toyota Prius was redesigned for the 2010 model year. As in earlier models, the Prius is a hybrid with both a gasoline engine and electric motor. A Prius Plug-in model was introduced in the 2012 model year. This variant also uses a gasoline engine and electric motor, but the motor's lithium-ion battery can be charged by connecting it with an electrical cord to a standard household outlet. The Plug-in is designed to operate primarily in electric mode for 11 miles from a full charge. Beyond this range, it operates in the same manner as the standard Prius.

Two tests of the Prius were conducted, the first by Toyota of a 2010 Prius as part of side crash test verification and the second by the Institute of a 2012 Prius Plug-in. Ratings are based on both tests and apply to both Prius variants. Vehicle specifications are provided for the 2010 Prius from the Toyota test and photos are provided from the Institute's test of the 2012 Prius Plug-in.

Injury measures

Driver — In both tests, measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Passenger — In both tests, measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Head protection

Driver — In both tests, the dummy’s head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof.

Passenger — In both tests, the dummy’s head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof.

Tested vehicle specifications

Tested vehicle 2010 Toyota Prius 4-door
Weight 3,064 lbs.
Side airbags standard front and rear head curtain airbags and standard front seat-mounted torso airbags
Wheelbase 106 in.
Length 176 in.
Width 69 in.
Engine 1.8 L 4-cylinder (gasoline) and electric motor
EPA ratings 51 mpg city / 48 mpg highway

How this test is conducted

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test ID VTS0901 CES1206
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm)
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.
-11.0 -11.5

Driver injury measures

Test ID VTS0901 CES1206
Head HIC-15 562 391
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.0 0.7
Compression (kN) 0.1 0.1
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm) 52 56
Lateral force (kN) 1.9 2.1
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm) 36 36
Average deflection (mm) 27 23
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) 5.50 3.11
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) 0.78 0.51
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN) 1.0 1.5
Acetabulum force (kN) 1.9 1.8
Combined force (kN) 2.6 3.1
Left femur
L-M force (kN) 0.9 1.1
L-M moment (Nm) 191 180
A-P moment (Nm) -118 95

Passenger injury measures

Test ID VTS0901 CES1206
Head HIC-15 190 134
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.3 0.4
Compression (kN) 1.0 0.7
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm) 45 44
Lateral force (kN) 1.4 1.3
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm) 35 37
Average deflection (mm) 23 24
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) 4.50 4.44
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) 0.69 0.82
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN) 0.7 0.8
Acetabulum force (kN) 2.2 1.9
Combined force (kN) 2.8 2.4
Left femur
L-M force (kN) 1.0 1.5
L-M moment (Nm) 230 231
A-P moment (Nm) 65 -38

Applies to 2011-15 models built after December 2010

Overall evaluation
G
Curb weight 3,056 lbs
Peak force 12,846 lbs
Strength-to-weight ratio 4.20
Tested vehicle
Rating applies to both the Prius (tested) and the Prius Plug-in Hybrid.
2011 Toyota Prius Two 4-door
Roof strength test ratings can be compared across vehicle categories.

In the test, the strength of the roof is determined by pushing a metal plate against one side of it at a slow but constant speed. The force applied relative to the vehicle's weight is known as the strength-to-weight ratio. This graph shows how the ratio varied as the test of this vehicle progressed. The peak strength-to-weight ratio recorded at any time before the roof is crushed 5 inches is the key measurement of roof strength.

A good rating requires a strength-to-weight ratio of at least 4. In other words, the roof must withstand a force of at least 4 times the vehicle's weight before the plate crushes the roof by 5 inches. For an acceptable rating, the minimum required strength-to-weight ratio is 3.25. For a marginal rating, it is 2.5. Anything lower than that is poor.

How this test is conducted

Applies to 2010-15 models

Overall evaluation
G
Dynamic rating
G
Seat/head restraint geometry
G
Important: Ratings for head restraints & seats should be compared only among vehicles of similar weight.

Seat type

Manual cloth seats AHR

How this test is conducted

Seat type Manual cloth seats AHR
Geometry
Backset (mm) 37
Distance below top of head (mm) 34
Seat design parameters
Pass/fail Pass
Max T1 acceleration (g) 12.6
Head contact time (ms) 62
Force rating 1
Neck forces
Max neck shear force (N) 1
Max neck tension (N) 499

Applies to 2013-15 models built after May 2013

System details

  • Optional Pre-Collision System

Package name

  • Optional Advanced Technology Package

Overall evaluation

Crash avoidance rating
Advanced
with optional
equipment
2 points total

Forward collision warning

This system meets the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's criteria for forward collision warning.
1 point

Low-speed autobrake

In the 12 mph IIHS test, impact speed was reduced by 5 mph.
1 point

High-speed autobrake

In the 25 mph IIHS test, impact speed was reduced by 4 mph.
0 points

How this rating is determined

Applies to 2015 models

How this rating is determined

Overall evaluation

M
Vehicle trim Two
Seat type cloth

This vehicle has 2 rear seating positions with complete child seat attachment (LATCH) hardware.

It has 1 additional seating position with a tether anchor only.

1 2 3


Good
Acceptable
Marginal
Poor
Seating positions that rely on borrowed lower anchors or have only a tether anchor available are not rated.
Tether anchor
Lower anchors
Lower anchor(s) can be borrowed from adjacent positions(s)
No hardware available

Details by seating position

1
Tether anchor
easy-to-find location
other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
too deep in seat
not too much force needed to attach
difficult to maneuver around anchors
2
Tether anchor
easy-to-find location
no other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
none available
3
Tether anchor
easy-to-find location
other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
too deep in seat
not too much force needed to attach
difficult to maneuver around anchors

Seat position 21

3
Lower anchor A
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 4-6
Force (lbs) 12
Clearance angle (degrees) 29
Lower anchor B
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 4-6
Force (lbs) 12
Clearance angle (degrees) 28
Tether anchor
Location Middle seatback
Confusing hardware present Yes
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor
No

Seat position 22

2
Lower anchor A
No lower latch for this seat position
Lower anchor B
No lower latch for this seat position
Tether anchor
Location Middle seatback
Confusing hardware present No
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor
No

Seat position 23

1
Lower anchor A
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 4-6
Force (lbs) 14
Clearance angle (degrees) 26
Lower anchor B
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 4-6
Force (lbs) 10
Clearance angle (degrees) 25
Tether anchor
Location Middle seatback
Confusing hardware present Yes
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor
No
1
Side airbags: front and rear head curtain airbags and front seat-mounted torso airbags
2
Driver knee airbag: a separate airbag in the lower instrument panel designed to minimize knee injuries in frontal crashes
3
Electronic stability control
4
Antilock brakes
5
Daytime running lights (beginning with 2012 models)

©1996-2016, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Highway Loss Data Institute | www.iihs.org