Home » Ratings

2011 Toyota 4Runner

Midsize SUV
Check
for recalls
  • Moderate overlap front
    G
  • Side
    G
  • Roof strength
    A
  • Head restraints & seats
    G
1
Side airbags: head curtain airbags for all three rows of seats (when equipped with 3rd row) and front seat-mounted torso airbags
2
Rollover sensor: designed to deploy the side curtain airbags in the event of an impending rollover
3
Driver and front passenger knee airbags: separate airbags in the lower instrument panel designed to minimize knee injuries in frontal crashes
4
Electronic stability control
5
Antilock brakes
6
Daytime running lights
Model yearFront small overlapFront moderate overlapSideRoof strengthHead restraints & seats
2014
M
G
G
G
G
2013
G
G
G
G
2012
G
G
A
G
2011
G
G
A
G
2010
G
G
A
G
2009
G
G
P
2008
G
G
P
2007
G
G
P
2006
G
G
P
2005
G
P
2004
G
P
2003
G
P
2002
A
2001
A
2000
A
1999
A
1998
A
1997
A
1996
A

Applies to 2010-14 models

Overall evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
G
Injury measures
Head/neck
A
Chest
G
Leg/foot, left
G
Leg/foot, right
G
Restraints and dummy kinematics
G
Important: Frontal crash test ratings should be compared only among vehicles of similar weight.

The Toyota 4Runner was redesigned for the 2010 model year. Frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Toyota as part of frontal crash test verification.

Injury measures

Measures taken from the neck, chest, and both legs indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this severity. A high head acceleration occurred when the dummy's head hit the steering wheel through the airbag, indicating that head injuries would be possible. Head acceleration from the roof rail hit was low.

Restraints and dummy kinematics

Dummy movement was well controlled. During rebound, the dummy's head hit the roof rail.

Tested vehicle specifications

Tested vehicle2010 Toyota 4Runner SR5 4wd
Weight 4,674 lbs.
Side airbagsfront and rear head curtain airbags and front seat-mounted torso airbags
Wheelbase110 in.
Length190 in.
Width76 in.
Engine4.0 L V6
EPA ratings17 mpg city / 22 mpg highway

How this test is conducted

Measures of occcupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test IDVTF0910
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm)9
Left (cm)11
Center (cm)12
Right (cm)10
Brake pedal (cm)3
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm)0
Right (cm)1
Steering column movement
Upward (cm)-5
Rearward (cm)5
A-pillar rearward movement (cm)1

Driver injury measures

Test IDVTF0910
Head
HIC-15357
Peak gs at hard contact71
Neck
Tension (kN)1.5
Extension bending moment (Nm)22
Maximum Nij 0.30
Chest maximum compression (mm)21
Legs
Femur force - left (kN)1.5
Femur force - right (kN)1.6
Knee displacement - left (mm)3
Knee displacement - right (mm)1
Maximum tibia index - left0.49
Maximum tibia index - right0.31
Tibia axial force - left (kN)2.6
Tibia axial force - right (kN)3.3
Foot acceleration (g)
Left94
Right111

Applies to 2010-13 models

Overall evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
G
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
G
Torso
G
Pelvis/leg
G
Head protection
G
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
G
Torso
G
Pelvis/leg
G
Head protection
G
Side crash test ratings can be compared across vehicle categories.

The Toyota 4Runner was redesigned for the 2010 model year. Side ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Toyota as part of side crash test verification.

Injury measures

Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Passenger — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Head protection

Driver — The dummy’s head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof and a side airbag that deployed from the seat.

Passenger — The dummy’s head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof.

Tested vehicle specifications

Tested vehicle2010 Toyota 4Runner SR5 4wd
Weight 4,656 lbs.
Side airbagsfront and second row head curtain airbags and front seat-mounted torso airbags (vehicle not equipped with third row seats)
Wheelbase110 in.
Length190 in.
Width76 in.
Engine4.0 L V6
EPA ratings17 mpg city / 22 mpg highway

How this test is conducted

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test IDVTS1002
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm)
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.
-16.5

Driver injury measures

Test IDVTS1002
Head HIC-15126
Neck
Tension (kN)0.0
Compression (kN)0.7
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)35
Lateral force (kN)1.8
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)23
Average deflection (mm)21
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)3.30
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)0.29
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN)1.5
Acetabulum force (kN)3.2
Combined force (kN)4.6
Left femur
L-M force (kN)1.0
L-M moment (Nm)57
A-P moment (Nm) -149

Passenger injury measures

Test IDVTS1002
Head HIC-15120
Neck
Tension (kN)0.5
Compression (kN)0.1
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)28
Lateral force (kN)1.6
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)29
Average deflection (mm)17
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)2.90
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)0.31
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN)0.3
Acetabulum force (kN)2.7
Combined force (kN)2.6
Left femur
L-M force (kN)1.0
L-M moment (Nm)24
A-P moment (Nm) 53

Applies to 2010-13 models

Overall evaluation
A
Curb weight4,734 lbs
Peak force18,334 lbs
Strength-to-weight ratio3.87
Tested vehicle
2010 Toyota 4Runner SR5 4-door 4wd
Roof strength test ratings can be compared across vehicle categories.

In the test, the strength of the roof is determined by pushing a metal plate against one side of it at a slow but constant speed. The force applied relative to the vehicle's weight is known as the strength-to-weight ratio. This graph shows how the ratio varied as the test of this vehicle progressed. The peak strength-to-weight ratio recorded at any time before the roof is crushed 5 inches is the key measurement of roof strength.

A good rating requires a strength-to-weight ratio of at least 4. In other words, the roof must withstand a force of at least 4 times the vehicle's weight before the plate crushes the roof by 5 inches. For an acceptable rating, the minimum required strength-to-weight ratio is 3.25. For a marginal rating, it is 2.5. Anything lower than that is poor.

How this test is conducted

Applies to 2010-14 models

Overall evaluation
G
Dynamic rating
G
Seat/head restraint geometry
G
Important: Ratings for head restraints & seats should be compared only among vehicles of similar weight.

Seat type

Manual cloth seats (AHR)

How this test is conducted

Seat typeManual cloth seats (AHR)
Geometry
Backset (mm)44
Distance below top of head (mm)30
Seat design parameters
Pass/failPass
Max T1 acceleration (g)11.4
Head contact time (ms)68
Force ratingLow
Neck forces
Max neck shear force (N)44
Max neck tension (N)532

©1996-2014, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Highway Loss Data Institute | www.iihs.org