Home » Ratings

2015 Subaru Forester

Small SUV
2014 Subaru Forester shown
2014 Subaru Forester shown
Crashworthiness
  • Small overlap front
    G
  • Moderate overlap front
    G
  • Side
    G
  • Roof strength
    G
  • Head restraints & seats
    G

Front crash prevention
Crash avoidance rating
Superior
with optional
equipment

Check for NHTSA recalls


Child Seat Anchors (LATCH)
ease of use
M
1
Side airbags: front and rear head curtain airbags and front seat-mounted torso airbags
2
Rollover sensor: designed to deploy the side curtain airbags in the event of an impending rollover
3
Driver knee airbag: a separate airbag in the lower instrument panel designed to minimize knee injuries in frontal crashes
4
Electronic stability control
5
Antilock brakes
6
Daytime running lights
Model year Front overlap SideRoof strengthHead restraints & seatsFront crash prevention
SmallModerate
2015
G
G
G
G
G
Crash avoidance rating
Superior
2014
G
G
G
G
G
Crash avoidance rating
Superior
2013
G
G
G
G
Crash avoidance rating
Not available
2012
G
G
G
G
Crash avoidance rating
2011
G
G
G
G
Crash avoidance rating
2010
G
G
G
G
Crash avoidance rating
2009
G
G
G
G
Crash avoidance rating
2008
G
G
G
Crash avoidance rating
2007
G
G
G
Crash avoidance rating
2006
G
G
G
Crash avoidance rating
2005
G
G
Crash avoidance rating
2004
G
G
Crash avoidance rating
2003
G
G
Crash avoidance rating
2002
G
Crash avoidance rating
2001
G
Crash avoidance rating
2000
G
Crash avoidance rating
1999
G
Crash avoidance rating

Applies to 2014-15 models

Overall evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
G
Injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Hip/thigh
G
Lower leg/foot
G
Restraints and dummy kinematics
G
Important: Frontal crash test ratings should be compared only among vehicles of similar weight.

The Subaru Forester was redesigned for the 2014 model year.

Structure

The driver space was maintained well, with maximum intrusion of the lower interior of 10 cm and maximum intrusion of the upper interior of 5 cm.

Injury measures

Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity. (Note: during the test, injury data from the neck were not obtained, but after the Institute reviewed comparable test data from Subaru, the head/neck injury risk was rated good.)

Restraints and dummy kinematics

The dummy’s movement was well controlled. The dummy’s head loaded the frontal airbag, which stayed in front of the dummy until rebound. The side curtain airbag deployed and had sufficient forward coverage to protect the head from contact with side structure and outside objects. The side torso airbag also deployed.

Tested vehicle specifications

Tested vehicle2014 Subaru Forester 2.5i Premium 4-door 4wd
Weight 3,393 lbs.
Side airbagsfront and rear head curtain airbags and front seat-mounted torso airbags
Wheelbase104 in.
Length181 in.
Width71 in.
Engine2.5 L 4-cylinder
EPA ratings24 mpg city / 32 mpg highway

How this test is conducted

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test IDCEN1303
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm)9
Footrest (cm)10
Left toepan (cm)6
Brake pedal (cm)6
Parking brake (cm)
Rocker panel lateral average (cm)0
Upper occupant compartment
Steering column0
Upper hinge pillar max (cm)5
Upper dash (cm)4
Lower instrument panel (cm)2

Driver injury measures

Test IDCEN1303
Head
HIC-15127
Peak gs at hard contactno contact
Neck
Tension (kN)
Extension bending moment (Nm)
Maximum Nij 0.00
Chest maximum compression (mm)26
Femur (kN)
Left1.7
Right1.2
Knee displacement (mm)
Left4
Right1
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left0
Right0
Maximum tibia index
Left0.35
Right0.41
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left2.3
Right2.1
Foot acceleration (g)
Left50
Right47

Applies to 2014-15 models

Overall evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
G
Injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Leg/foot, left
G
Leg/foot, right
G
Restraints and dummy kinematics
G
Important: Frontal crash test ratings should be compared only among vehicles of similar weight.

The Subaru Forester was redesigned for the 2014 model year, Moderate overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Subaru as part of frontal crash test verification.

Injury measures

Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Restraints and dummy kinematics

Dummy movement was well controlled. Both driver and passenger side curtains and side torso airbags deployed during the crash. After the dummy moved forward into the frontal airbag, it rebounded into the seat without its head coming close to any stiff structure that could cause injury.

Tested vehicle specifications

Tested vehicle2014 Subaru Forester 2.5i Premium 4-door 4wd
Weight 3,408 lbs.
Side airbagsfront and rear head curtain airbags and front seat-mounted torso airbags
Wheelbase104 in.
Length181 in.
Width71 in.
Engine2.5 L 4-cylinder
EPA ratings24 mpg city / 32 mpg highway

How this test is conducted

Measures of occcupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test IDVTF1301
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm)1
Left (cm)2
Center (cm)3
Right (cm)4
Brake pedal (cm)2
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm)-2
Right (cm)0
Steering column movement
Upward (cm)-3
Rearward (cm)-5
A-pillar rearward movement (cm)0

Driver injury measures

Test IDVTF1301
Head
HIC-15223
Peak gs at hard contactno contact
Neck
Tension (kN)1.8
Extension bending moment (Nm)30
Maximum Nij 0.37
Chest maximum compression (mm)31
Legs
Femur force - left (kN)1.5
Femur force - right (kN)1.3
Knee displacement - left (mm)3
Knee displacement - right (mm)2
Maximum tibia index - left0.48
Maximum tibia index - right0.49
Tibia axial force - left (kN)2.4
Tibia axial force - right (kN)2.2
Foot acceleration (g)
Left63
Right50

Applies to 2014-15 models

Overall evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
G
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
G
Torso
G
Pelvis/leg
G
Head protection
G
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
G
Torso
G
Pelvis/leg
G
Head protection
G
Side crash test ratings can be compared across vehicle categories.

The Subaru Forester was redesigned for the 2014 model year. Side ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Subaru as part of side crash test verification.

Injury measures

Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Passenger — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Head protection

Driver — The dummy's head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof.

Passenger — The dummy's head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof.

Tested vehicle specifications

Tested vehicle2014 Subaru Forester 2.5i Premium 4-door 4wd
Weight 3,402 lbs.
Side airbagsstandard front and rear head curtain airbags and standard front seat-mounted torso airbags
Wheelbase104 in.
Length181 in.
Width71 in.
Engine2.5 L 4-cylinder
EPA ratings24 mpg city / 32 mpg highway

How this test is conducted

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test IDVTS1224
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm)
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.
-14.0

Driver injury measures

Test IDVTS1224
Head HIC-15186
Neck
Tension (kN)0.2
Compression (kN)0.7
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)39
Lateral force (kN)1.5
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)37
Average deflection (mm)30
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)2.97
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)0.67
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN)1.8
Acetabulum force (kN)1.1
Combined force (kN)2.9
Left femur
L-M force (kN)0.4
L-M moment (Nm)85
A-P moment (Nm) -31

Passenger injury measures

Test IDVTS1224
Head HIC-1575
Neck
Tension (kN)0.2
Compression (kN)0.4
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)42
Lateral force (kN)2.3
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)31
Average deflection (mm)22
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)3.28
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)0.48
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN)0.4
Acetabulum force (kN)1.6
Combined force (kN)1.6
Left femur
L-M force (kN)0.6
L-M moment (Nm)20
A-P moment (Nm) 75

Applies to 2014-15 models

Overall evaluation
G
Curb weight3,352 lbs
Peak force16,585 lbs
Strength-to-weight ratio4.95
Tested vehicle
2014 Subaru Forester 2.5i 4-door 4wd
Roof strength test ratings can be compared across vehicle categories.

In the test, the strength of the roof is determined by pushing a metal plate against one side of it at a slow but constant speed. The force applied relative to the vehicle's weight is known as the strength-to-weight ratio. This graph shows how the ratio varied as the test of this vehicle progressed. The peak strength-to-weight ratio recorded at any time before the roof is crushed 5 inches is the key measurement of roof strength.

A good rating requires a strength-to-weight ratio of at least 4. In other words, the roof must withstand a force of at least 4 times the vehicle's weight before the plate crushes the roof by 5 inches. For an acceptable rating, the minimum required strength-to-weight ratio is 3.25. For a marginal rating, it is 2.5. Anything lower than that is poor.

How this test is conducted

Applies to 2014-15 models

Overall evaluation
G
Dynamic rating
G
Seat/head restraint geometry
G
Important: Ratings for head restraints & seats should be compared only among vehicles of similar weight.

Seat type

Power cloth seats

How this test is conducted

Seat typePower cloth seats
Geometry
Backset (mm)23
Distance below top of head (mm)-2
Seat design parameters
Pass/failPass
Max T1 acceleration (g)14.5
Head contact time (ms)58
Force rating1
Neck forces
Max neck shear force (N)0
Max neck tension (N)347

Applies to 2014-15 models

System details

  • Optional EyeSight

Package name

  • Optional EyeSight

Overall evaluation

Crash avoidance rating
Superior
with optional
equipment
6 points total

Forward collision warning

This system meets the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's criteria for forward collision warning.
1 point

Low-speed autobrake

In the 12 mph IIHS test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
2 points

High-speed autobrake

In the 25 mph IIHS test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
3 points

How this rating is determined

Applies to 2015 models

How this rating is determined

Overall evaluation

M
Vehicle trim2.5i Premium
Seat type cloth

This vehicle has 2 rear seating positions with complete child seat attachment (LATCH) hardware.

It has 1 additional seating position with a tether anchor only.

123


Good
Acceptable
Marginal
Poor
Seating positions that rely on borrowed lower anchors or have only a tether anchor available are not rated.
Tether anchor
Lower anchors
Lower anchor(s) can be borrowed from adjacent positions(s)
No hardware available

Details by seating position

1
Tether anchor
easy-to-find location
no other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
too deep in seat
not too much force needed to attach
difficult to maneuver around anchors
2
Tether anchor
easy-to-find location
no other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
none available
3
Tether anchor
easy-to-find location
no other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
too deep in seat
not too much force needed to attach
difficult to maneuver around anchors

Seat position 21

3
Lower anchor A
Depth (cm)4-6
Force (lbs)0.0
Clearance angle (degrees)47
Lower anchor B
Depth (cm)4-6
Force (lbs)0.0
Clearance angle (degrees)49
Tether anchor
LocationMiddle seatback
Confusing hardware presentYes
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor
Yes

Seat position 22

2
Lower anchor A
No lower latch for this seat position
Lower anchor B
No lower latch for this seat position
Tether anchor
LocationMiddle seatback
Confusing hardware presentNo
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor
Yes

Seat position 23

1
Lower anchor A
Depth (cm)4-6
Force (lbs)0.0
Clearance angle (degrees)59
Lower anchor B
Depth (cm)4-6
Force (lbs)0.0
Clearance angle (degrees)53
Tether anchor
LocationMiddle seatback
Confusing hardware presentYes
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor
Yes

©1996-2015, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Highway Loss Data Institute | www.iihs.org