Home » Ratings

2004 Saab 9-3 4-door sedan

Midsize luxury/near luxury car
Check
for recalls
  • Moderate overlap front
    G
  • Side
    G
  • Roof strength
    A
Ratings shown are the latest available for this model year.
See below for ratings based on manufacture date.
2004 Saab 9-3 4-door sedan
2004 Saab 9-3 4-door sedan
1
Side airbags: front and rear head curtain airbags and front seat-mounted torso airbags
2
Electronic stability control
3
Antilock brakes
4
Daytime running lights
Model yearFront small overlapFront moderate overlapSideRoof strengthHead restraints & seats
2011
G
G
A
G
2010
G
G
A
G
2009
G
G
A
G
2008
G
G
A
G
2007
G
G
A
G
2006
G
G
A
G
2005
G
G
A
G
2004
G
G
A
2003
G
A
2002
A
2001
A
2000
A
1999
A

Applies to 2003-11 models

Overall evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
G
Injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Leg/foot, left
G
Leg/foot, right
G
Restraints and dummy kinematics
G
Important: Frontal crash test ratings should be compared only among vehicles of similar weight.

The Saab 9-3 was redesigned for the 2003 model year.

The frontal offset crash test ratings also apply to the station wagon version of the 9-3, known as the SportCombi, beginning with its introduction in the 2006 model year.

Injury measures

Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Restraints and dummy kinematics

Dummy movement was well controlled. The side curtain airbags deployed, as intended by Saab (even for frontal impacts). After the dummy moved forward into the frontal airbag, its head brushed the side airbag and its fabric cover. The dummy continued to rebound into the seat without its head coming close to any stiff structure that could cause injury.

Tested vehicle specifications

Tested vehicle2003 Saab 9-3 Linear 4-door
Weight 3,322 lbs.
Side airbagsfront and rear head curtain airbags and front seat-mounted torso airbags
Wheelbase105 in.
Length182 in.
Width69 in.
Engine2.0 L turbocharged 4-cylinder
EPA ratings22 mpg city / 31 mpg highway

How this test is conducted

Measures of occcupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test IDCEF0306
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm)6
Left (cm)8
Center (cm)14
Right (cm)13
Brake pedal (cm)8
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm)3
Right (cm)1
Steering column movement
Upward (cm)-1
Rearward (cm)5
A-pillar rearward movement (cm)2

Driver injury measures

Test IDCEF0306
Head
HIC-15164
Peak gs at hard contactno contact
Neck
Tension (kN)1.1
Extension bending moment (Nm)8
Maximum Nij 0.20
Chest maximum compression (mm)37
Legs
Femur force - left (kN)2.0
Femur force - right (kN)5.0
Knee displacement - left (mm)2
Knee displacement - right (mm)0
Maximum tibia index - left0.29
Maximum tibia index - right0.38
Tibia axial force - left (kN)1.3
Tibia axial force - right (kN)1.6
Foot acceleration (g)
Left62
Right65

Applies to 2004-11 models built after December 2003

Overall evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
A
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
G
Torso
G
Pelvis/leg
G
Head protection
G
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
G
Torso
G
Pelvis/leg
G
Head protection
G
Side crash test ratings can be compared across vehicle categories.

The Saab 9-3 was redesigned for the 2003 model year. Modifications were made to the side torso airbags for 2004 and later models built after December 2003 to improve occupant protection in side-impact crashes.

The side impact crash test ratings also apply to the station wagon version of the 9-3, known as the SportCombi, beginning with its introduction in the 2006 model year.

Injury measures

Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Passenger — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Head protection

Driver — The dummy's head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof and a side airbag that deployed from the seat.

Passenger — The dummy's head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof.

Tested vehicle specifications

Tested vehicle2004 Saab 9-3 Linear 4-door
Weight 3,236 lbs.
Side airbagsstandard front and rear head curtain airbags and standard front seat-mounted torso airbags
Wheelbase105 in.
Length182 in.
Width69 in.
Engine2.0 L turbocharged 4-cylinder
EPA ratings21 mpg city / 30 mpg highway

How this test is conducted

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test IDCES0412
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm)
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.
-11.0

Driver injury measures

Test IDCES0412
Head HIC-15205
Neck
Tension (kN)1.0
Compression (kN)0.6
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)41
Lateral force (kN)1.7
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)45
Average deflection (mm)33
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)5.16
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)0.95
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN)1.9
Acetabulum force (kN)2.9
Combined force (kN)4.5
Left femur
L-M force (kN)1.0
L-M moment (Nm)91
A-P moment (Nm) 27

Passenger injury measures

Test IDCES0412
Head HIC-15204
Neck
Tension (kN)0.1
Compression (kN)0.4
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)40
Lateral force (kN)1.8
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)36
Average deflection (mm)29
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)3.22
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)0.35
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN)0.1
Acetabulum force (kN)1.4
Combined force (kN)1.4
Left femur
L-M force (kN)1.7
L-M moment (Nm)180
A-P moment (Nm) 18

Applies to 2003-11 models

Overall evaluation
A
Curb weight3,344 lbs
Peak force11,482 lbs
Strength-to-weight ratio3.43
Tested vehicle
2011 Saab 9-3 Sport Sedan 4-door
Roof strength test ratings can be compared across vehicle categories.

In the test, the strength of the roof is determined by pushing a metal plate against one side of it at a slow but constant speed. The force applied relative to the vehicle's weight is known as the strength-to-weight ratio. This graph shows how the ratio varied as the test of this vehicle progressed. The peak strength-to-weight ratio recorded at any time before the roof is crushed 5 inches is the key measurement of roof strength.

A good rating requires a strength-to-weight ratio of at least 4. In other words, the roof must withstand a force of at least 4 times the vehicle's weight before the plate crushes the roof by 5 inches. For an acceptable rating, the minimum required strength-to-weight ratio is 3.25. For a marginal rating, it is 2.5. Anything lower than that is poor.

How this test is conducted

©1996-2014, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Highway Loss Data Institute | www.iihs.org