Home » Ratings » Nissan Juke » 2013

2013 Nissan Juke

Small car

Crashworthiness
Front crash
prevention
Crash avoidance rating
Not Available
  • Moderate overlap front
    G
  • Side
    G
  • Roof strength
    G
  • Head restraints & seats
    G
1
Side airbags: front and rear head curtain airbags and front seat-mounted torso airbags
2
Electronic stability control
3
Antilock brakes
Model yearFront small overlapFront moderate overlapSideRoof strengthHead restraints & seats
2014
G
G
G
G
2013
G
G
G
G
2012
G
G
G
G
2011
G
G
G
G

Applies to 2011-14 models

Overall evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
G
Injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Leg/foot, left
G
Leg/foot, right
G
Restraints and dummy kinematics
G
Important: Frontal crash test ratings should be compared only among vehicles of similar weight.

The Nissan Juke was introduced in the 2011 model year and is derived from the Nissan Versa. Two tests of the Juke were conducted, one by the Institute and the other by Nissan as part of frontal crash test verification. Ratings are based on both tests.

Injury measures

In each test, measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Restraints and dummy kinematics

Dummy movement was well controlled in both tests. The driver side curtain and side torso airbags deployed during both crashes. After the dummy moved forward into the frontal airbag, its head contacted the side curtain airbag and the dummy rebounded into the seat without its head coming close to any stiff structure that could cause injury.

Tested vehicle specifications

Tested vehicle2011 Nissan Juke S and SV wagons 2wd
Weight 2,965 lbs.
Side airbagsfront and rear head curtain airbags and front seat-mounted torso airbags
Wheelbase100 in.
Length162 in.
Width69 in.
Engine1.6 L turbocharged 4-cylinder
EPA ratings27 mpg city / 32 mpg highway

How this test is conducted

Measures of occcupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test IDVTF1013CEF1103
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm)97
Left (cm)1310
Center (cm)1211
Right (cm)1210
Brake pedal (cm)138
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm)13
Right (cm)22
Steering column movement
Upward (cm)31
Rearward (cm)31
A-pillar rearward movement (cm)21

Driver injury measures

Test IDVTF1013CEF1103
Head
HIC-15179397
Peak gs at hard contactno contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)1.3 1.0
Extension bending moment (Nm)-22 10
Maximum Nij 0.24 0.19
Chest maximum compression (mm)33 31
Legs
Femur force - left (kN)3.9 3.3
Femur force - right (kN)3.1 3.9
Knee displacement - left (mm)0 5
Knee displacement - right (mm)10 7
Maximum tibia index - left0.45 0.34
Maximum tibia index - right0.41 0.51
Tibia axial force - left (kN)1.61.3
Tibia axial force - right (kN)1.41.7
Foot acceleration (g)
Left7179
Right7770

Applies to 2011-14 models

Overall evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
A
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
G
Torso
G
Pelvis/leg
G
Head protection
G
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
G
Torso
G
Pelvis/leg
G
Head protection
G
Side crash test ratings can be compared across vehicle categories.

The Nissan Juke was introduced in the 2011 model year and is derived from the Nissan Versa.

Injury measures

Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Passenger — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Head protection

Driver — The dummy’s head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof and a side airbag that deployed from the seat.

Passenger — The dummy’s head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof.

Tested vehicle specifications

Tested vehicle2011 Nissan Juke S wagon 2wd
Weight 2,956 lbs.
Side airbagsstandard front and rear head curtain airbags and standard front seat-mounted torso airbags
Wheelbase100 in.
Length162 in.
Width69 in.
Engine1.6 L turbocharged 4-cylinder
EPA ratings27 mpg city / 32 mpg highway

How this test is conducted

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test IDCES1105
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm)
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.
-10.0

Driver injury measures

Test IDCES1105
Head HIC-15174
Neck
Tension (kN)1.0
Compression (kN)0.2
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)23
Lateral force (kN)1.6
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)30
Average deflection (mm)25
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)2.53
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)0.40
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN)2.3
Acetabulum force (kN)1.1
Combined force (kN)3.4
Left femur
L-M force (kN)0.8
L-M moment (Nm)91
A-P moment (Nm) -23

Passenger injury measures

Test IDCES1105
Head HIC-15138
Neck
Tension (kN)0.1
Compression (kN)0.6
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)32
Lateral force (kN)1.4
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)26
Average deflection (mm)20
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)2.83
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)0.27
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN)0.4
Acetabulum force (kN)2.7
Combined force (kN)2.7
Left femur
L-M force (kN)1.0
L-M moment (Nm)85
A-P moment (Nm) -18

Applies to 2011-14 models

Overall evaluation
G
Curb weight2,955 lbs
Peak force13,191 lbs
Strength-to-weight ratio4.46
Tested vehicle
2011 Nissan Juke S 4-door 2wd
Roof strength test ratings can be compared across vehicle categories.

In the test, the strength of the roof is determined by pushing a metal plate against one side of it at a slow but constant speed. The force applied relative to the vehicle's weight is known as the strength-to-weight ratio. This graph shows how the ratio varied as the test of this vehicle progressed. The peak strength-to-weight ratio recorded at any time before the roof is crushed 5 inches is the key measurement of roof strength.

A good rating requires a strength-to-weight ratio of at least 4. In other words, the roof must withstand a force of at least 4 times the vehicle's weight before the plate crushes the roof by 5 inches. For an acceptable rating, the minimum required strength-to-weight ratio is 3.25. For a marginal rating, it is 2.5. Anything lower than that is poor.

How this test is conducted

Applies to 2011-14 models

Overall evaluation
G
Dynamic rating
G
Seat/head restraint geometry
G
Important: Ratings for head restraints & seats should be compared only among vehicles of similar weight.

Seat type

Manual cloth seats

How this test is conducted

Seat typeManual cloth seats
Geometry
Backset (mm)25
Distance below top of head (mm)44
Seat design parameters
Pass/failPass
Max T1 acceleration (g)12.1
Head contact time (ms)57
Force ratingLow
Neck forces
Max neck shear force (N)0
Max neck tension (N)419

Applies to 2013-15 models

Overall evaluation

Crash avoidance rating
Not Available
0 points total

Forward collision warning

Not available.
0 points

Low-speed autobrake

Not available.
0 points

High-speed autobrake

Not available.
0 points

How this rating is determined

©1996-2014, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Highway Loss Data Institute | www.iihs.org