Home » Ratings

2015 Nissan Frontier

Small pickup

Crashworthiness
Front crash
prevention
Crash avoidance rating
Not Available
Check
for recalls
  • Moderate overlap front
    G
  • Roof strength
    G
  • Head restraints & seats
    A
2010 Nissan Frontier shown
2010 Nissan Frontier shown
1
Side airbags: front and rear head curtain airbags and front seat-mounted torso airbags
2
Rollover sensor: designed to deploy the side curtain airbags in the event of an impending rollover
3
Electronic stability control
4
Antilock brakes
Model yearFront small overlapFront moderate overlapSideRoof strengthHead restraints & seats
2015
G
G
A
2014
G
G
G
A
2013
G
G
G
A
2012
G
G
G
A
2011
G
G
G
A
2010
G
G
G
A
2009
G
G
M
G
P
2008
G
G
M
G
P
2007
G
G
M
G
P
2006
G
G
M
G
P
2005
G
G
M
G
P
2004
M
2003
M
2002
M
2001
M
2000
M
1999
M
1998
M

Applies to 2013-15 models

Overall evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
G
Injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Leg/foot, left
M
Leg/foot, right
A
Restraints and dummy kinematics
G
Important: Frontal crash test ratings should be compared only among vehicles of similar weight.

The Nissan Frontier was redesigned for the 2005 model year, and the Suzuki Equator was introduced in the 2009 model year and discontinued after the 2013 model year. Beginning with 2013 models, design changes were made to the frontal airbags and seat belts.

Moderate overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Nissan as part of frontal crash test verification. (The vehicle tested by Nissan was designated as a 2012 model but included the airbag and seat belt changes of the 2013 models.) Because the vehicle structure did not change after 2005, structure ratings are based this test as well as two earlier tests of the Frontier, one a 2005 model and the other a 2008 model.

Injury measures

Measures taken from the head, neck, and chest indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this severity. Forces on the left knee, left and right tibias, and right foot indicate that left knee, left and right lower leg, and right foot injuries would be possible.

Restraints and dummy kinematics

Dummy movement was well controlled. After the dummy moved forward into the airbag, it rebounded into the seat without its head coming close to any stiff structure that could cause injury.

Tested vehicle specifications

Tested vehicle2012 Nissan Frontier SV (4wd King Cab)
Weight 4,347 lbs.
Side airbagsfront and rear head curtain airbags and front seat-mounted torso airbags
Wheelbase126 in.
Length206 in.
Width73 in.
Engine4.0 L V6
EPA ratings14 mpg city / 19 mpg highway

How this test is conducted

Measures of occcupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test IDCEF0504VTF0812VTF1216
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm)111212
Left (cm)121320
Center (cm)141516
Right (cm)121317
Brake pedal (cm)765
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm)10-1
Right (cm)1-1-2
Steering column movement
Upward (cm)434
Rearward (cm)0-12
A-pillar rearward movement (cm)232

Driver injury measures

Test IDVTF1216
Head
HIC-15333
Peak gs at hard contactno contact
Neck
Tension (kN)1.3
Extension bending moment (Nm)19
Maximum Nij 0.27
Chest maximum compression (mm)36
Legs
Femur force - left (kN)3.5
Femur force - right (kN)2.2
Knee displacement - left (mm)13
Knee displacement - right (mm)7
Maximum tibia index - left1.01
Maximum tibia index - right0.78
Tibia axial force - left (kN)2.0
Tibia axial force - right (kN)4.3
Foot acceleration (g)
Left137
Right163

Applies to 2005-15 models

Overall evaluation
G
Curb weight4,265 lbs
Peak force17,535 lbs
Strength-to-weight ratio4.11
Tested vehicle
Rating applies only to crew cab models.
2010 Nissan Frontier SE Crew Cab 2wd
Roof strength test ratings can be compared across vehicle categories.

In the test, the strength of the roof is determined by pushing a metal plate against one side of it at a slow but constant speed. The force applied relative to the vehicle's weight is known as the strength-to-weight ratio. This graph shows how the ratio varied as the test of this vehicle progressed. The peak strength-to-weight ratio recorded at any time before the roof is crushed 5 inches is the key measurement of roof strength.

A good rating requires a strength-to-weight ratio of at least 4. In other words, the roof must withstand a force of at least 4 times the vehicle's weight before the plate crushes the roof by 5 inches. For an acceptable rating, the minimum required strength-to-weight ratio is 3.25. For a marginal rating, it is 2.5. Anything lower than that is poor.

How this test is conducted

Applies to 2010-15 models

Overall evaluation
A
Dynamic rating
A
Seat/head restraint geometry
G
Important: Ratings for head restraints & seats should be compared only among vehicles of similar weight.

Seat type

Manual cloth seats (AHR)

How this test is conducted

Seat typeManual cloth seats (AHR)
Geometry
Backset (mm)44
Distance below top of head (mm)48
Seat design parameters
Pass/failPass
Max T1 acceleration (g)12.4
Head contact time (ms)53
Force ratingModerate
Neck forces
Max neck shear force (N)152
Max neck tension (N)645

Applies to 2013-15 models

Overall evaluation

Crash avoidance rating
Not Available
0 points total

Forward collision warning

Not available.
0 points

Low-speed autobrake

Not available.
0 points

High-speed autobrake

Not available.
0 points

How this rating is determined

©1996-2014, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Highway Loss Data Institute | www.iihs.org