Home » Ratings

2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor

Midsize SUV
  • Moderate overlap front
    G
  • Roof strength
    M
  • Head restraints & seats
    P
2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor
2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor
1
Side airbags: front and rear head curtain airbags and front seat-mounted torso airbags (beginning with 2007 models)
2
Rollover sensor: designed to deploy the side curtain airbags in the event of an impending rollover (beginning with 2007 models)
3
Side airbags: front seat-mounted torso airbags (standard in 2005-06 models, optional in 2004 models)
4
Electronic stability control (standard beginning with 2007 4-wheel-drive models and all 2008 models, optional on 2004-06 4wd models)
5
Antilock brakes (standard on all 4-wheel-drive models and 2006 and later 2-wheel-drive models, optional on 2004-05 2wd models)
6
Daytime running lights (beginning with 2006 models)
Model yearFront small overlapFront moderate overlapSideRoof strengthHead restraints & seats
2011
G
G
M
M
2010
G
G
M
M
2009
G
G
M
P
2008
G
G
M
P
2007
G
G
M
P
2006
G
M
P
2005
G
M
P
2004
G
M
P

Applies to 2004-11 models

Overall evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
G
Injury measures
Head/neck
A
Chest
G
Leg/foot, left
G
Leg/foot, right
A
Restraints and dummy kinematics
G
Important: Frontal crash test ratings should be compared only among vehicles of similar weight.

The Mitsubishi Endeavor was introduced in the 2004 model year.

Injury measures

Measures taken from the head, chest, and left leg indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this severity. Forces on the dummy's neck indicate that injuries to the neck would be possible. Forces on the right tibia indicate that injuries to the lower leg would be possible. Head acceleration from the B-pillar/roof rail hit was low.

Restraints and dummy kinematics

Dummy movement was well controlled. During rebound, the dummy's head hit the B-pillar and roof rail.

Tested vehicle specifications

Tested vehicle2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor LS 4wd
Weight 4,079 lbs.
Side airbagsnone
Wheelbase108 in.
Length190 in.
Width74 in.
Engine3.8 L V6
EPA ratings17 mpg city / 21 mpg highway

How this test is conducted

Measures of occcupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test IDCEF0321
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm)11
Left (cm)17
Center (cm)15
Right (cm)11
Brake pedal (cm)13
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm)2
Right (cm)1
Steering column movement
Upward (cm)-1
Rearward (cm)4
A-pillar rearward movement (cm)1

Driver injury measures

Test IDCEF0321
Head
HIC-15186
Peak gs at hard contact11
Neck
Tension (kN)2.0
Extension bending moment (Nm)22
Maximum Nij 0.40
Chest maximum compression (mm)35
Legs
Femur force - left (kN)2.9
Femur force - right (kN)1.9
Knee displacement - left (mm)1
Knee displacement - right (mm)1
Maximum tibia index - left0.32
Maximum tibia index - right0.83
Tibia axial force - left (kN)0.8
Tibia axial force - right (kN)2.5
Foot acceleration (g)
Left91
Right59

Applies to 2004-11 models

Overall evaluation
M
Curb weight4,174 lbs
Peak force12,533 lbs
Strength-to-weight ratio3.00
Tested vehicle
2010 Mitsubishi Endeavor SE 4-door 4wd
Roof strength test ratings can be compared across vehicle categories.

In the test, the strength of the roof is determined by pushing a metal plate against one side of it at a slow but constant speed. The force applied relative to the vehicle's weight is known as the strength-to-weight ratio. This graph shows how the ratio varied as the test of this vehicle progressed. The peak strength-to-weight ratio recorded at any time before the roof is crushed 5 inches is the key measurement of roof strength.

A good rating requires a strength-to-weight ratio of at least 4. In other words, the roof must withstand a force of at least 4 times the vehicle's weight before the plate crushes the roof by 5 inches. For an acceptable rating, the minimum required strength-to-weight ratio is 3.25. For a marginal rating, it is 2.5. Anything lower than that is poor.

How this test is conducted

Applies to 2004-06 models

Overall evaluation
P
Dynamic rating
Seat/head restraint geometry
M
Important: Ratings for head restraints & seats should be compared only among vehicles of similar weight.

Seat type

Leather seats

How this test is conducted

Seat typeLeather seats
Geometry
Backset (mm)90
Distance below top of head (mm)90
Seat design parameters
Pass/failFail
Max T1 acceleration (g)
Head contact time (ms)
Force rating
Neck forces
Max neck shear force (N)
Max neck tension (N)

Applies to 2004-06 models

Overall evaluation
P
Dynamic rating
Seat/head restraint geometry
P
Important: Ratings for head restraints & seats should be compared only among vehicles of similar weight.

Seat type

Cloth seats

How this test is conducted

Seat typeCloth seats
Geometry
Backset (mm)118
Distance below top of head (mm)68
Seat design parameters
Pass/failFail
Max T1 acceleration (g)
Head contact time (ms)
Force rating
Neck forces
Max neck shear force (N)
Max neck tension (N)

©1996-2014, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Highway Loss Data Institute | www.iihs.org