Home » Ratings » Lincoln MKT » 2013

2013 Lincoln MKT

Midsize luxury SUV

Crashworthiness
Front crash
prevention
Crash avoidance rating
Basic
with optional
equipment
  • Moderate overlap front
    G
  • Side
    G
  • Roof strength
    G
  • Head restraints & seats
    G
1
Side airbags: front and rear head curtain airbags and front seat-mounted torso airbags
2
Rollover sensor: designed to deploy the side curtain airbags in the event of an impending rollover
3
Inflatable seat belts (optional beginning with 2013 models in second row outboard seats)
4
Electronic stability control, includes roll stability control to minimize the possibility of rollover
5
Antilock brakes
Model yearFront small overlapFront moderate overlapSideRoof strengthHead restraints & seats
2014
G
G
G
G
2013
G
G
G
G
2012
G
G
G
G
2011
G
G
G
G
2010
G
G
G
G

Applies to 2010-14 models

Overall evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
G
Injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Leg/foot, left
G
Leg/foot, right
G
Restraints and dummy kinematics
G
Important: Frontal crash test ratings should be compared only among vehicles of similar weight.

The Lincoln MKT was introduced in the 2010 model year. It is structurally similar to the Ford Flex. Frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Ford as part of frontal crash test verification.

Injury measures

Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Restraints and dummy kinematics

Dummy movement was well controlled. After the dummy moved forward into the airbag, it rebounded into the seat without its head coming close to any stiff structure that could cause injury.

Tested vehicle specifications

Tested vehicle2010 Lincoln MKT 4wd
Weight 5,046 lbs.
Side airbagsfront and rear head curtain airbags and front seat-mounted torso airbags
Wheelbase118 in.
Length208 in.
Width76 in.
Engine3.5 L turbocharged V6
EPA ratings16 mpg city / 22 mpg highway

How this test is conducted

Measures of occcupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test IDVTF0822
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm)7
Left (cm)11
Center (cm)14
Right (cm)12
Brake pedal (cm)4
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm)6
Right (cm)5
Steering column movement
Upward (cm)0
Rearward (cm)-6
A-pillar rearward movement (cm)2

Driver injury measures

Test IDVTF0822
Head
HIC-15194
Peak gs at hard contactno contact
Neck
Tension (kN)1.5
Extension bending moment (Nm)9
Maximum Nij 0.35
Chest maximum compression (mm)44
Legs
Femur force - left (kN)1.9
Femur force - right (kN)1.2
Knee displacement - left (mm)0
Knee displacement - right (mm)0
Maximum tibia index - left0.41
Maximum tibia index - right0.47
Tibia axial force - left (kN)1.2
Tibia axial force - right (kN)3.5
Foot acceleration (g)
Left57
Right129

Applies to 2010-14 models

Overall evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
A
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
G
Torso
G
Pelvis/leg
G
Head protection
G
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
G
Torso
G
Pelvis/leg
G
Head protection
G
Side crash test ratings can be compared across vehicle categories.

The Lincoln MKT was introduced in the 2010 model year. It is structurally similar to the Ford Flex. Side ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Ford as part of side crash test verification.

Injury measures

Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Passenger — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Head protection

Driver — The dummy's head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof and a side airbag that deployed from the seat.

Passenger — The dummy's head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof.

Tested vehicle specifications

Tested vehicle2010 Lincoln MKT 4wd
Weight 5,035 lbs.
Side airbagsstandard front and rear head curtain airbags and standard front seat-mounted torso airbags
Wheelbase118 in.
Length208 in.
Width76 in.
Engine3.5 L turbocharged V6
EPA ratings16 mpg city / 22 mpg highway

How this test is conducted

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test IDVTS0903
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm)
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.
-8.5

Driver injury measures

Test IDVTS0903
Head HIC-15101
Neck
Tension (kN)0.8
Compression (kN)0.8
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)27
Lateral force (kN)1.3
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)31
Average deflection (mm)26
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)2.70
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)0.40
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN)1.6
Acetabulum force (kN)1.6
Combined force (kN)3.2
Left femur
L-M force (kN)0.2
L-M moment (Nm)84
A-P moment (Nm) 13

Passenger injury measures

Test IDVTS0903
Head HIC-15139
Neck
Tension (kN)0.1
Compression (kN)0.3
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)14
Lateral force (kN)1.0
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)27
Average deflection (mm)23
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)3.10
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)0.20
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN)0.3
Acetabulum force (kN)2.7
Combined force (kN)2.8
Left femur
L-M force (kN)0.3
L-M moment (Nm)81
A-P moment (Nm) 31

Applies to 2010-14 models

Overall evaluation
G
Curb weight4,899 lbs
Peak force21,010 lbs
Strength-to-weight ratio4.29
Tested vehicle
2010 Lincoln MKT 4-door 4wd
Roof strength test ratings can be compared across vehicle categories.

In the test, the strength of the roof is determined by pushing a metal plate against one side of it at a slow but constant speed. The force applied relative to the vehicle's weight is known as the strength-to-weight ratio. This graph shows how the ratio varied as the test of this vehicle progressed. The peak strength-to-weight ratio recorded at any time before the roof is crushed 5 inches is the key measurement of roof strength.

A good rating requires a strength-to-weight ratio of at least 4. In other words, the roof must withstand a force of at least 4 times the vehicle's weight before the plate crushes the roof by 5 inches. For an acceptable rating, the minimum required strength-to-weight ratio is 3.25. For a marginal rating, it is 2.5. Anything lower than that is poor.

How this test is conducted

Applies to 2011-14 models

Overall evaluation
G
Dynamic rating
G
Seat/head restraint geometry
G
Important: Head restraints & seats ratings should be compared only among vehicles of similar weight.

Seat type

Power leather seats

How this test is conducted

Seat typePower leather seats
Geometry
Backset (mm)34
Distance below top of head (mm)26
Seat design parameters
Pass/failPass
Max T1 acceleration (g)10.4
Head contact time (ms)63
Force ratingLow
Neck forces
Max neck shear force (N)77
Max neck tension (N)554

Applies to 2013 models

System details

  • Optional Collision Warning

Overall evaluation

Crash avoidance rating
Basic
with optional
equipment
1 point total

Forward collision warning

This system meets the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's criteria for forward collision warning.
1 point

Low-speed autobrake

Not available.
0 points

High-speed autobrake

Not available.
0 points

How this rating is determined

©1996-2014, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Highway Loss Data Institute | www.iihs.org