Home » Ratings

2014 Honda Pilot

Midsize SUV

Crashworthiness
Front crash
prevention
Crash avoidance rating
Not Available
Check
for recalls
  • Small overlap front
    P
  • Moderate overlap front
    G
  • Side
    G
  • Roof strength
    G
  • Head restraints & seats
    G
1
Side airbags: head curtain airbags for all three rows of seats and front seat-mounted torso airbags
2
Rollover sensor: designed to deploy the side curtain airbags in the event of an impending rollover
3
Electronic stability control
4
Antilock brakes
5
Daytime running lights
Model yearFront small overlapFront moderate overlapSideRoof strengthHead restraints & seats
2014
P
G
G
G
G
2013
P
G
G
G
G
2012
P
G
G
G
G
2011
P
G
G
M
G
2010
P
G
G
M
G
2009
P
G
G
M
G
2008
G
G
G
2007
G
G
G
2006
G
G
G
2005
G
M
2004
G
M
2003
G
M

Applies to 2009-14 models

Overall evaluation
P
Structure and safety cage
P
Injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Hip/thigh
P
Lower leg/foot
M
Restraints and dummy kinematics
M
Important: Frontal crash test ratings should be compared only among vehicles of similar weight.

The Honda Pilot was redesigned for the 2009 model year.

Structure

The driver's space was seriously compromised by intruding structure. Lower interior intrusion measured as much as 42 cm at the parking brake pedal, and lower hinge pillar intrusion was 35 cm. Upper interior intrusion measured 26-28 cm at the hinge pillar and instrument panel. The steering column was pushed back 11 cm toward the driver.

Injury measures

Measures from the dummy indicate that injuries to the left hip would be likely in a crash of this severity and injuries to the left knee and both lower legs would be possible.

Restraints and dummy kinematics

The dummy’s head barely contacted the frontal airbag before sliding off the left side as the steering column moved 14 cm to the right, leaving the head vulnerable to contact with forward side structure. The side curtain airbag deployed but does not have sufficient forward coverage to protect the head from contact with forward side structure and outside objects. The side torso airbag deployed.

Tested vehicle specifications

Tested vehicle2014 Honda Pilot EX 4wd
Weight 4,504 lbs.
Side airbagshead curtain airbags for all three rows of seats and front seat-mounted torso airbags
Wheelbase109 in.
Length191 in.
Width79 in.
Engine3.5 L V6
EPA ratings17 mpg city / 24 mpg highway

How this test is conducted

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test IDCEN1405
Lower hinge pillar max (cm)35
Footrest (cm)31
Lower occupant compartment
Left toepan (cm)25
Brake pedal (cm)23
Parking brake (cm)42
Rocker panel lateral average (cm)26
Steering column11
Upper hinge pillar max (cm)26
Upper occupant compartment
Upper dash (cm)27
Lower instrument panel (cm)28

Driver injury measures

Test IDCEN1405
Head
HIC-1542
Peak gs at hard contactno contact
Neck
Tension (kN)0.9
Extension bending moment (Nm)27
Maximum Nij 0.30
Chest maximum compression (mm)17
Femur (kN)
Left6.6
Right3.4
Knee displacement (mm)
Left16
Right10
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left31
Right1
Maximum tibia index
Left0.82
Right1.03
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left2.3
Right1.8
Foot acceleration (g)
Left64
Right61

Applies to 2009-14 models

Overall evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
G
Injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Leg/foot, left
G
Leg/foot, right
G
Restraints and dummy kinematics
G
Important: Frontal crash test ratings should be compared only among vehicles of similar weight.

The Honda Pilot was redesigned for the 2009 model year. Frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Honda as part of frontal crash test verification.

Injury measures

Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Restraints and dummy kinematics

Dummy movement was well controlled. The driver side curtain and side torso airbags deployed during the crash.

Tested vehicle specifications

Tested vehicle2009 Honda Pilot EX 4wd
Weight 4,610 lbs.
Side airbagshead curtain airbags for all three rows of seats and front seat-mounted torso airbags
Wheelbase109 in.
Length191 in.
Width79 in.
Engine3.5 L V6
EPA ratings16 mpg city / 22 mpg highway

How this test is conducted

Measures of occcupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test IDVTF0807
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm)8
Left (cm)8
Center (cm)11
Right (cm)13
Brake pedal (cm)10
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm)-1
Right (cm)-1
Steering column movement
Upward (cm)-4
Rearward (cm)-1
A-pillar rearward movement (cm)1

Driver injury measures

Test IDVTF0807
Head
HIC-15164
Peak gs at hard contactno contact
Neck
Tension (kN)0.9
Extension bending moment (Nm)48
Maximum Nij 0.33
Chest maximum compression (mm)26
Legs
Femur force - left (kN)0.1
Femur force - right (kN)1.9
Knee displacement - left (mm)2
Knee displacement - right (mm)2
Maximum tibia index - left0.38
Maximum tibia index - right0.46
Tibia axial force - left (kN)1.5
Tibia axial force - right (kN)2.0
Foot acceleration (g)
Left62
Right72

Applies to 2009-14 models

Overall evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
G
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
G
Torso
G
Pelvis/leg
G
Head protection
G
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
G
Torso
G
Pelvis/leg
G
Head protection
G
Side crash test ratings can be compared across vehicle categories.

The Honda Pilot was redesigned for the 2009 model year.

Injury measures

Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Passenger — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Head protection

Driver — The dummy’s head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof.

Passenger — The dummy’s head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof.

Tested vehicle specifications

Tested vehicle2009 Honda Pilot EX-L 4wd
Weight 4,522 lbs.
Side airbagsstandard head curtain airbags for all three rows of seats and standard front seat-mounted torso airbags
Wheelbase109 in.
Length191 in.
Width79 in.
Engine3.5 L V6
EPA ratings16 mpg city / 22 mpg highway

How this test is conducted

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test IDCES0830
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm)
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.
-17.0

Driver injury measures

Test IDCES0830
Head HIC-15123
Neck
Tension (kN)1.0
Compression (kN)0.0
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)21
Lateral force (kN)1.1
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)35
Average deflection (mm)32
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)2.89
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)0.41
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN)2.7
Acetabulum force (kN)1.4
Combined force (kN)4.0
Left femur
L-M force (kN)0.4
L-M moment (Nm)44
A-P moment (Nm) 21

Passenger injury measures

Test IDCES0830
Head HIC-15113
Neck
Tension (kN)0.5
Compression (kN)0.3
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)35
Lateral force (kN)1.3
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)37
Average deflection (mm)28
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)3.44
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)0.62
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN)1.2
Acetabulum force (kN)2.0
Combined force (kN)2.7
Left femur
L-M force (kN)0.2
L-M moment (Nm)56
A-P moment (Nm) -14

Applies to 2012-14 models

Overall evaluation
G
Curb weight4,475 lbs
Peak force20,702 lbs
Strength-to-weight ratio4.63
Tested vehicle
2012 Honda Pilot EX 4-door 4wd
Roof strength test ratings can be compared across vehicle categories.

In the test, the strength of the roof is determined by pushing a metal plate against one side of it at a slow but constant speed. The force applied relative to the vehicle's weight is known as the strength-to-weight ratio. This graph shows how the ratio varied as the test of this vehicle progressed. The peak strength-to-weight ratio recorded at any time before the roof is crushed 5 inches is the key measurement of roof strength.

A good rating requires a strength-to-weight ratio of at least 4. In other words, the roof must withstand a force of at least 4 times the vehicle's weight before the plate crushes the roof by 5 inches. For an acceptable rating, the minimum required strength-to-weight ratio is 3.25. For a marginal rating, it is 2.5. Anything lower than that is poor.

How this test is conducted

Applies to 2009-14 models

Overall evaluation
G
Dynamic rating
G
Seat/head restraint geometry
G
Important: Ratings for head restraints & seats should be compared only among vehicles of similar weight.

Seat type

Power seats (AHR)

How this test is conducted

Seat typePower seats (AHR)
Geometry
Backset (mm)48
Distance below top of head (mm)36
Seat design parameters
Pass/failPass
Max T1 acceleration (g)13.3
Head contact time (ms)60
Force ratingLow
Neck forces
Max neck shear force (N)1
Max neck tension (N)433

Applies to 2013-15 models

Overall evaluation

Crash avoidance rating
Not Available
0 points total

Forward collision warning

Not available.
0 points

Low-speed autobrake

Not available.
0 points

High-speed autobrake

Not available.
0 points

How this rating is determined

©1996-2014, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Highway Loss Data Institute | www.iihs.org