Home » Ratings

2015 Ford Taurus

Large family car
Crashworthiness
  • Moderate overlap front
    G
  • Side
    G
  • Roof strength
    G
  • Head restraints & seats
    G

Front crash prevention
Crash avoidance rating
Basic
with optional
equipment

Check for NHTSA recalls


Child Seat Anchors (LATCH)
ease of use
A
1
Side airbags: front and rear head curtain airbags and front seat-mounted torso airbags
2
Rollover sensor: designed to deploy the side curtain airbags in the event of an impending rollover
3
Electronic stability control
4
Antilock brakes
5
Daytime running lights (optional on vehicles sold to fleets)
Model year Front overlap SideRoof strengthHead restraints & seatsFront crash prevention
SmallModerate
2015
G
G
G
G
Crash avoidance rating
Basic
2014
G
G
G
G
Crash avoidance rating
Basic
2013
G
G
G
G
Crash avoidance rating
Basic
2012
G
G
G
G
Crash avoidance rating
2011
G
G
G
G
Crash avoidance rating
2010
G
G
G
G
Crash avoidance rating
2009
G
G
G
Crash avoidance rating
2008
G
G
G
Crash avoidance rating
2006
G
M
Crash avoidance rating
2005
G
M
Crash avoidance rating
2004
G
M
Crash avoidance rating
2003
G
Crash avoidance rating
2002
G
Crash avoidance rating
2001
G
Crash avoidance rating
2000
G
Crash avoidance rating
1999
G
Crash avoidance rating
1998
G
Crash avoidance rating
1997
G
Crash avoidance rating
1996
G
Crash avoidance rating
1995
G
Crash avoidance rating
1994
G
Crash avoidance rating

Applies to 2010-15 models

Overall evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
G
Injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Leg/foot, left
G
Leg/foot, right
G
Restraints and dummy kinematics
G
Important: Frontal crash test ratings should be compared only among vehicles of similar weight.

The Ford Taurus was re-engineered and restyled for the 2010 model year. Frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Ford as part of frontal crash test verification.

Injury measures

Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Restraints and dummy kinematics

Dummy movement was well controlled. After the dummy moved forward into the airbag, it rebounded into the seat without its head coming close to any stiff structure that could cause injury.

Tested vehicle specifications

Tested vehicle2010 Ford Taurus Limited 4-door 4WD
Weight 4,253 lbs.
Side airbagsfront and rear head curtain airbags and front seat-mounted torso airbags
Wheelbase113 in.
Length203 in.
Width76 in.
Engine3.5 L V6
EPA ratings17 mpg city / 25 mpg highway

How this test is conducted

Measures of occcupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test IDVTF0821
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm)5
Left (cm)6
Center (cm)7
Right (cm)7
Brake pedal (cm)3
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm)-3
Right (cm)-2
Steering column movement
Upward (cm)1
Rearward (cm)2
A-pillar rearward movement (cm)1

Driver injury measures

Test IDVTF0821
Head
HIC-15178
Peak gs at hard contactno contact
Neck
Tension (kN)1.3
Extension bending moment (Nm)13
Maximum Nij 0.33
Chest maximum compression (mm)39
Legs
Femur force - left (kN)0.3
Femur force - right (kN)0.2
Knee displacement - left (mm)2
Knee displacement - right (mm)1
Maximum tibia index - left0.36
Maximum tibia index - right0.59
Tibia axial force - left (kN)2.0
Tibia axial force - right (kN)1.4
Foot acceleration (g)
Left55
Right64

Applies to 2010-15 models

Overall evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
A
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
G
Torso
G
Pelvis/leg
G
Head protection
G
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
G
Torso
G
Pelvis/leg
G
Head protection
G
Side crash test ratings can be compared across vehicle categories.

The Ford Taurus was re-engineered and restyled for the 2010 model year. Side ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Ford as part of side crash test verification.

Injury measures

Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Passenger — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Head protection

Driver — The dummy’s head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof.

Passenger — The dummy’s head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof.

Tested vehicle specifications

Tested vehicle2010 Ford Taurus SHO 4-door 4WD
Weight 4,475 lbs.
Side airbagsstandard front and rear head curtain airbags and standard front seat-mounted torso airbags
Wheelbase113 in.
Length203 in.
Width76 in.
Engine3.5 L turbocharged V6
EPA ratings17 mpg city / 25 mpg highway

How this test is conducted

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test IDVTS0802
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm)
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.
-12.0

Driver injury measures

Test IDVTS0802
Head HIC-15123
Neck
Tension (kN)0.8
Compression (kN)0.5
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)37
Lateral force (kN)1.4
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)37
Average deflection (mm)31
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)4.00
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)0.50
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN)2.6
Acetabulum force (kN)2.7
Combined force (kN)5.1
Left femur
L-M force (kN)0.1
L-M moment (Nm)75
A-P moment (Nm) 19

Passenger injury measures

Test IDVTS0802
Head HIC-15207
Neck
Tension (kN)0.2
Compression (kN)0.4
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)34
Lateral force (kN)1.6
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)43
Average deflection (mm)33
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)5.10
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)0.80
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN)0.9
Acetabulum force (kN)3.3
Combined force (kN)3.6
Left femur
L-M force (kN)0.1
L-M moment (Nm)103
A-P moment (Nm) 24

Applies to 2010-15 models

Overall evaluation
G
Curb weight3,972 lbs
Peak force16,759 lbs
Strength-to-weight ratio4.22
Tested vehicle
2010 Ford Taurus SEL 4-door
Roof strength test ratings can be compared across vehicle categories.

In the test, the strength of the roof is determined by pushing a metal plate against one side of it at a slow but constant speed. The force applied relative to the vehicle's weight is known as the strength-to-weight ratio. This graph shows how the ratio varied as the test of this vehicle progressed. The peak strength-to-weight ratio recorded at any time before the roof is crushed 5 inches is the key measurement of roof strength.

A good rating requires a strength-to-weight ratio of at least 4. In other words, the roof must withstand a force of at least 4 times the vehicle's weight before the plate crushes the roof by 5 inches. For an acceptable rating, the minimum required strength-to-weight ratio is 3.25. For a marginal rating, it is 2.5. Anything lower than that is poor.

How this test is conducted

Applies to 2013-15 models

Overall evaluation
G
Dynamic rating
G
Seat/head restraint geometry
G
Important: Ratings for head restraints & seats should be compared only among vehicles of similar weight.

Seat type

Power leather seats with 4-way head restraints

How this test is conducted

Seat typePower leather seats with 4-way head restraints
Geometry
Backset (mm)20
Distance below top of head (mm)27
Seat design parameters
Pass/failPass
Max T1 acceleration (g)10.1
Head contact time (ms)57
Force rating1
Neck forces
Max neck shear force (N)42
Max neck tension (N)529

Applies to 2014-15 models

System details

  • Optional Collision Warning

Package name

  • Optional 301A + Adaptive Cruise Control for 2014 models
  • optional Adaptive Cruise Control and Forward Collision Warning for 2015 models

Overall evaluation

Crash avoidance rating
Basic
with optional
equipment
1 point total

Forward collision warning

This system meets the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's criteria for forward collision warning.
1 point

Low-speed autobrake

Not available.
0 points

High-speed autobrake

Not available.
0 points

How this rating is determined

Applies to 2015 models

How this rating is determined

Overall evaluation

A
Vehicle trimLimited
Seat type leather

This vehicle has 2 rear seating positions with complete child seat attachment (LATCH) hardware.

It has 1 additional seating position with a tether anchor and the ability to borrow lower anchors from the other seating positions.

Note: When anchors are borrowed, they aren't available to use in their designated positions.

123


Good
Acceptable
Marginal
Poor
Seating positions that rely on borrowed lower anchors or have only a tether anchor available are not rated.
Tether anchor
Lower anchors
Lower anchor(s) can be borrowed from adjacent positions(s)
No hardware available

Details by seating position

1
Tether anchor
easy-to-find location
no other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
too deep in seat
not too much force needed to attach
easy to maneuver around anchors
2
Tether anchor
easy-to-find location
no other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
Can be borrowed from 1 and 3
3
Tether anchor
easy-to-find location
no other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
too deep in seat
not too much force needed to attach
easy to maneuver around anchors

Seat position 21

3
Lower anchor A
Depth (cm)0-2
Force (lbs)12.1
Clearance angle (degrees)70
Lower anchor B
Depth (cm)2-4
Force (lbs)23.3
Clearance angle (degrees)62
Tether anchor
LocationRear deck
Confusing hardware presentNo
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor
No

Seat position 22

2
Lower anchor A
Lower latch is shared for this seat position
Lower anchor B
Lower latch is shared for this seat position
Tether anchor
LocationRear deck
Confusing hardware presentNo
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor
No

Seat position 23

1
Lower anchor A
Depth (cm)2-4
Force (lbs)18.3
Clearance angle (degrees)65
Lower anchor B
Depth (cm)0-2
Force (lbs)17.3
Clearance angle (degrees)69
Tether anchor
LocationRear deck
Confusing hardware presentNo
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor
No

©1996-2015, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Highway Loss Data Institute | www.iihs.org