Home » Ratings

2011 Ford Explorer

Midsize SUV
  • Moderate overlap front
    G
  • Side
    G
  • Roof strength
    G
  • Head restraints & seats
    G
1
Side airbags: head curtain airbags for all three rows of seats and front seat-mounted torso airbags
2
Rollover sensor: designed to deploy the side curtain airbags in the event of an impending rollover
3
Passenger knee airbag: a separate airbag in the lower instrument panel designed to minimize knee injuries in frontal crashes (beginning with 2013 models)
4
Inflatable seat belts (optional in second row outboard seats)
5
Electronic stability control, includes roll stability control
6
Antilock brakes
Model yearFront small overlapFront moderate overlapSideRoof strengthHead restraints & seats
2014
M
G
G
G
G
2013
M
G
G
G
G
2012
G
G
G
G
2011
G
G
G
G
2010
G
A
A
2009
G
A
A
2008
G
A
P
2007
G
A
P
2006
G
A
P
2005
G
P
2004
G
P
2003
G
2002
G
2001
A
2000
A
1999
A
1998
A
1997
A
1996
A
1995
A

Applies to 2011-14 models

Overall evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
G
Injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Leg/foot, left
G
Leg/foot, right
G
Restraints and dummy kinematics
G
Important: Frontal crash test ratings should be compared only among vehicles of similar weight.

The Ford Explorer was redesigned for the 2011 model year and now shares the same basic design as the Ford Flex. Frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Ford as part of frontal crash test verification.

Injury measures

Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Restraints and dummy kinematics

Dummy movement was well controlled. The driver side curtain airbag deployed during the crash.

Tested vehicle specifications

Tested vehicle2011 Ford Explorer XLT 4wd
Weight 4,765 lbs.
Side airbagshead curtain airbags for all three rows of seats and front seat-mounted torso airbags
Wheelbase113 in.
Length197 in.
Width79 in.
Engine3.5 L V6
EPA ratings17 mpg city / 23 mpg highway

How this test is conducted

Measures of occcupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test IDVTF1014
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm)5
Left (cm)8
Center (cm)16
Right (cm)14
Brake pedal (cm)9
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm)5
Right (cm)5
Steering column movement
Upward (cm)-1
Rearward (cm)0
A-pillar rearward movement (cm)0

Driver injury measures

Test IDVTF1014
Head
HIC-15261
Peak gs at hard contactno contact
Neck
Tension (kN)1.3
Extension bending moment (Nm)8
Maximum Nij 0.25
Chest maximum compression (mm)31
Legs
Femur force - left (kN)0.6
Femur force - right (kN)3.0
Knee displacement - left (mm)5
Knee displacement - right (mm)2
Maximum tibia index - left0.18
Maximum tibia index - right0.60
Tibia axial force - left (kN)1.0
Tibia axial force - right (kN)1.8
Foot acceleration (g)
Left65
Right91

Applies to 2011-14 models

Overall evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
G
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
G
Torso
G
Pelvis/leg
G
Head protection
G
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
G
Torso
G
Pelvis/leg
G
Head protection
G
Side crash test ratings can be compared across vehicle categories.

The Ford Explorer was redesigned for the 2011 model year and now shares the same basic design as the Ford Flex. Side ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Ford as part of side crash test verification.

Injury measures

Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Passenger — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Head protection

Driver — The dummy’s head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof and a side airbag that deployed from the seat.

Passenger — The dummy’s head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof.

Tested vehicle specifications

Tested vehicle2011 Ford Explorer XLT 4wd
Weight 4,604 lbs.
Side airbagsstandard head curtain airbags for all three rows of seats and standard front seat-mounted torso airbags
Wheelbase113 in.
Length197 in.
Width79 in.
Engine3.5 L V6
EPA ratings17 mpg city / 23 mpg highway

How this test is conducted

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test IDVTS1013
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm)
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.
-23.5

Driver injury measures

Test IDVTS1013
Head HIC-1569
Neck
Tension (kN)1.0
Compression (kN)0.0
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)22
Lateral force (kN)1.4
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)18
Average deflection (mm)16
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)3.60
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)0.10
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN)1.8
Acetabulum force (kN)1.4
Combined force (kN)2.8
Left femur
L-M force (kN)0.2
L-M moment (Nm)74
A-P moment (Nm) 23

Passenger injury measures

Test IDVTS1013
Head HIC-1546
Neck
Tension (kN)0.0
Compression (kN)0.4
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)23
Lateral force (kN)1.4
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)17
Average deflection (mm)14
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)2.40
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)0.18
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN)0.2
Acetabulum force (kN)1.7
Combined force (kN)1.8
Left femur
L-M force (kN)0.1
L-M moment (Nm)56
A-P moment (Nm) 18

Applies to 2011-14 models

Overall evaluation
G
Curb weight4,661 lbs
Peak force21,347 lbs
Strength-to-weight ratio4.58
Tested vehicle
2011 Ford Explorer XLT 4-door 4wd
Roof strength test ratings can be compared across vehicle categories.

In the test, the strength of the roof is determined by pushing a metal plate against one side of it at a slow but constant speed. The force applied relative to the vehicle's weight is known as the strength-to-weight ratio. This graph shows how the ratio varied as the test of this vehicle progressed. The peak strength-to-weight ratio recorded at any time before the roof is crushed 5 inches is the key measurement of roof strength.

A good rating requires a strength-to-weight ratio of at least 4. In other words, the roof must withstand a force of at least 4 times the vehicle's weight before the plate crushes the roof by 5 inches. For an acceptable rating, the minimum required strength-to-weight ratio is 3.25. For a marginal rating, it is 2.5. Anything lower than that is poor.

How this test is conducted

Applies to 2011-14 models

Overall evaluation
G
Dynamic rating
G
Seat/head restraint geometry
G
Important: Ratings for head restraints & seats should be compared only among vehicles of similar weight.

Seat type

Power leather seat

How this test is conducted

Seat typePower leather seat
Geometry
Backset (mm)28
Distance below top of head (mm)28
Seat design parameters
Pass/failPass
Max T1 acceleration (g)9.0
Head contact time (ms)62
Force ratingLow
Neck forces
Max neck shear force (N)0
Max neck tension (N)540

©1996-2014, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Highway Loss Data Institute | www.iihs.org