ARLINGTON, Va. — Seven new vehicles representing six updated designs plus one brand new model have been tested in frontal offset crashes at 40 mph. Two of the six cars with updated designs show improvements since the last time they were tested by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, and the other four models retain their previous crashworthiness ratings.
The Institute's crashworthiness ratings of good, acceptable, marginal, or poor are based primarily on vehicle performance in the offset test. The top-rated cars are designated "best picks."
The one new model the Institute tested this time around, Lincoln's 2000 LS, earns a good overall rating and a "best pick" designation. One of the four redesigned models that retains its earlier rating, the 2000 Ford Taurus, already had earned the highest overall evaluation based on its performance in the offset test, so it couldn't improve any more. The 1992-95 and 1996-99 models of this car, like the 2000, earned good overall evaluations and "best pick" designations.
The two improved models recently tested by the Institute are the 2000 Toyota Avalon, a moderately priced midsize car, and the 2000 Mazda MPV, a passenger van. The Avalon improves to a good overall rating from marginal when the Institute originally tested the 1996 model. The MPV improves from marginal (1996 model) to acceptable. Nissan's redesigned Sentra (small car) and Maxima (moderately priced midsize car) retain their acceptable ratings from earlier tests. The 2000 Isuzu Rodeo still is rated poor, the same rating earned by the 1996 version of this midsize SUV.
"We started evaluating car crashworthiness in 40 mph frontal offset tests in 1995," Institute president Brian O'Neill says, "and since then we've tried to test new vehicle designs as quickly as they become available in showrooms. We know the manufacturers are paying attention to these crash test results, and what we're seeing in general are crashworthiness improvements when automakers redesign their vehicles. Still, there's plenty of room for more improvement. Too many new and redesigned vehicles still aren't good performers."
Presenting the updated test results for seven passenger vehicles, O'Neill cautions against comparing the results across vehicle type and size groups. "It would be tempting to conclude that a small vehicle with a top rating is more crashworthy than a larger car or van with a somewhat lower rating. But crash test results shouldn't be compared among vehicles with large weight differences. This is because barrier tests, including our 40 mph frontal offset impact into a deformable barrier, are more demanding of heavier vehicles than lighter ones. The most meaningful comparisons are among vehicles in the same type/size group. For example, compare small cars with other small cars, midsize utility vehicles with other midsize utility vehicles."
Large family cars
The Institute tested a 2000 Ford Taurus. This redesigned model earns a good rating for structural performance in the offset test, and dummy injury measures were low. Restraints/dummy kinematics are rated acceptable. This model, like two earlier Taurus designs, earns a good overall evaluation and a "best pick" designation.
Moderately priced midsize cars
The Institute tested a 2000 Toyota Avalon and 2000 Nissan Maxima, both redesigned versions of earlier models. The new Avalon gets good ratings across the board for structural performance, dummy injury measures, and restraints/dummy kinematics. This model earns a good overall evaluation and "best pick" designation. "We've tested the Avalon three times. The 1995-97 models were rated marginal, and the 1998-99 models improved to acceptable," O'Neill points out. "The 2000 model represents a big success story because of the substantial improvements compared with the first time we tested an Avalon."
The 2000 Maxima earns an acceptable overall evaluation, the same as 1997-99 models. A 1995 Maxima design was rated poor overall, so there has been improvement since the Institute began conducting offset tests to evaluate car crashworthiness.
The Institute tested a 2000 Nissan Sentra, which retains the same overall evaluation of acceptable as the 1998 design.
The Institute tested a 2000 Mazda MPV, which earns an acceptable overall rating. The rating for structural performance improves from marginal to acceptable, compared with the last time this model was tested (1996 design). Restraints/dummy kinematics improve from marginal to good. However, an injury measure recorded on the dummy's right leg/foot changes from acceptable to poor, indicating the likelihood of injury.
The Institute tested a 2000 Isuzu Rodeo, which fails to improve from its overall rating of poor the last time this model was tested (1996 design). The structure has been improved, but high crash forces recorded on the dummy's head indicate the likelihood of injury.
Large luxury cars
The Institute tested a 2000 Lincoln LS, a brand new model that earns good ratings for structure, dummy injury measures, and restraints/kinematics. The overall evaluation is good, and this car is a "best pick."